What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
It is not, and you already said along with the lines of circumstantial evidence is enough to give benefit of doubts to the accused party, hence Khawaja Asif's charge got clear.

Circumstantial evidence does not necessarily mean acquittal. Pieces of evidence (circumstantial) connected in chain leads to conviction, SC ruling. Moreover no law/rule exists that conviction can't be made in absence of direct evidence, conviction can be made if guilt of accused is proved beyond reasonable doubt through circumstantial and forensic evidence.

As per media reports Khawaja Asif got away not because Dar couldn't prove irregularities in his constituency, he got away because SC found ECP responsible for irregularities. We are yet to see detailed judgement, short order didn't record reasons anyway.

You already have confirmed what i have said earlier, and precisely why the accused party continues to get away because circumstantial evidence sounds good only for the plaintiff, not prosecutors.

No, accused ones especially corrupt political figures get away because of expediency & NROs, not because of unavailability of evidence, fat pigs leave a thick trail behind them. Thieves are cousin brothers - irony is thieves monitors public account committee. Heads of so-called autonomous institutions vested with the responsibility of accountability are appointed by corrupt politicians.

Prosecutors must provide concrete evidence. It is only fair that way since it is life of plaintiff that is hanging on the balance, not prosecutors.

What is a concrete evidence? An angle testimony? Evidence from heavens? It has been proved that too in SC that NS took bribe from ISI to rig elections of 1990 - doesn't it qualify to be a prove sufficient enough to bring NS to justice? PPP led government took pride in the verdict but took no action against NS, isn't it "you scratch my back I scratch yours" type of reconciliation?

Coming back to panama, please refer to para 1. I don't know about corruption but it won't be a rocket science to prove family a pathological liar & I will be surprised if NS & ors are not declared disqualified for misleading the nation and giving false statement on the floor of the house.
 
.
As NS said in his address to the nation 'corrupt person doesn't keep any assets in his name', yes Mr PM nothing is in your name ... everything is owned by your family members instead.
 
.
CxI3E8hWgAApbPv.jpg:large


CxI3E79XUAApXxE.jpg:large
 
.
Circumstantial evidence does not necessarily mean acquittal. Pieces of evidence (circumstantial) connected in chain leads to conviction, SC ruling. Moreover no law/rule exists that conviction can't be made in absence of direct evidence, conviction can be made if guilt of accused is proved beyond reasonable doubt through circumstantial and forensic evidence.

Circumstantial evidence is been known to swift in favor of plaintiff in most cases, but some cases can be exception. I don't see this case being any exception given the charge on Khawaja Asif just got cleared.


As per media reports Khawaja Asif got away not because Dar couldn't prove irregularities in his constituency, he got away because SC found ECP responsible for irregularities. We are yet to see detailed judgement, short order didn't record reasons anyway.

The ruled is based on the documented proceeding on the previous court that took place. You can see detail judgemental from the previous court on Khawaja Asif.


No, accused ones especially corrupt political figures get away because of expediency & NROs, not because of unavailability of evidence, fat pigs leave a thick trail behind them. Thieves are cousin brothers - irony is thieves monitors public account committee. Heads of so-called autonomous institutions vested with the responsibility of accountability are appointed by corrupt politicians.

I call this emotional overruling. Corruption is big deal, and no one can get away if the evidence is really strong.


What is a concrete evidence? An angle testimony? Evidence from heavens? It has been proved that too in SC that NS took bribe from ISI to rig elections of 1990 - doesn't it qualify to be a prove sufficient enough to bring NS to justice? PPP led government took pride in the verdict but took no action against NS, isn't it "you scratch my back I scratch yours" type of reconciliation?

In term of technological evidence, it is called money paper trail, and whereas for traditional form of evidence, it is called black money in the actual form hidden in their homes or the secret place belonging to their place.

I have said it before. Concrete evidence is a must especially when it comes to the life of plaintiff hanging on the balance. Otherwise, alleged ones who didn't do it can be easily trapped based on circumstantial evidence at best given we all have some gray area in our life which can be confusing to distinct them very clearly.

Coming back to panama, please refer to para 1. I don't know about corruption but it won't be a rocket science to prove family a pathological liar & I will be surprised if NS & ors are not declared disqualified for misleading the nation and giving false statement on the floor of the house.

I know but we cannot let our emotional overrule the case, can we? As i said, you already made up your mind, and that alone is enough to declare the case mistrial.

A mistrial may also result from a fundamental error so prejudicial to the defendant that it cannot be cured by appropriate instructions to the jury, such as improper remarks made during the prosecution's summation.
 
.
Circumstantial evidence is been known to swift in favor of plaintiff in most cases, but some cases can be exception. I don't see this case being any exception given the charge on Khawaja Asif just got cleared.

You're comparing an inquisitorial matter with an adversarial matter. Unlike Khawaja Asif case, these pending cases don't fall under appellate jurisdiction of the court, please make a note of that. Khawaja Asif case appropriately can be compared with Ayaz Sadiq, Jahangir Tareen & Khawaja Saad cases. Two of them decided in favor of runner ups, one has an interim order in place. Happy that at least you realized the importance of indirect evidence.

The ruled is based on the documented proceeding on the previous court that took place. You can see detail judgemental from the previous court on Khawaja Asif.

Have you read the judgement? Obviously the court upheld the verdict of tribunal. But as always SC has its own reasons for the judgement.

I call this emotional overruling. Corruption is big deal, and no one can get away if the evidence is really strong.

Not an emotional argument at all, I am stating the reality. Find me one politico, not some natho khera, convicted on the charges of corruption. Haven't you heard of NROs being implemented in Pakistan before? Not even a single so-called strong evidence is available to indict corrupts, I can't even gulp it but it's okay if you're fine with it.

In term of technological evidence, it is called money paper trail, and whereas for traditional form of evidence, it is called black money in the actual form hidden in their homes or the secret place belonging to their place.

I have said it before. Concrete evidence is a must especially when it comes to the life of plaintiff hanging on the balance. Otherwise, alleged ones who didn't do it can be easily trapped based on circumstantial evidence at best given we all have some gray area in our life which can be confusing to distinct them very clearly

Finding money trail is giant of a job, even world's most powerful & sophisticated investigating agencies struggle while picking up the trail and you expect PTI to come up with irrefutable money trail? Dude you're dealing with ordinary people not with NAB/FIA. Tracking trail is the job of the state's institutions, exactly what is being prayed in the petition.

Look this is not a trial, SC is not a trial court, lets not complicate it by relating it to life and death situation. No one has been indicted. Even if Sharifs are found guilty, the case will still go to a trial court for trial.

I know but we cannot let our emotional overrule the case, can we? As i said, you already made up your mind, and that alone is enough to declare the case mistrial.

Whats emotional overruling in it? Do you want me to recapitulate the statements passed on the floor of the house, clippings and stance taken in the court? Father negating son, son negating father, brother negating sister etc.
 
.
You're comparing an inquisitorial matter with an adversarial matter. Unlike Khawaja Asif case, these pending cases don't fall under appellate jurisdiction of the court, please make a note of that. Khawaja Asif case appropriately can be compared with Ayaz Sadiq, Jahangir Tareen & Khawaja Saad cases. Two of them decided in favor of runner ups, one has an interim order in place. Happy that at least you realized the importance of indirect evidence.

Given the process of the case, i doubt that is case since i repeatedly said the corruption charge is very serious matter. That's why i find circumstantial or indirect evidence speculative at best unless there is exception which i am yet to find example yet taking the case of Khawaja Asif into the account.



Have you read the judgement? Obviously the court upheld the verdict of tribunal. But as always SC has its own reasons for the judgement.

Care to entertain what do you think the reasons for judgement of SC might be. Because i am beginning to find your point speculative at best.


Not an emotional argument at all, I am stating the reality. Find me one politico, not some natho khera, convicted on the charges of corruption. Haven't you heard of NROs being implemented in Pakistan before? Not even a single so-called strong evidence is available to indict corrupts, I can't even gulp it but it's okay if you're fine with it.

Reality is called evidence, hard-core, concrete evidence, that something cannot be question for integrity in form of evidence. Right now, this is all speculative which won't be overruled in the process of the court.


Finding money trail is giant of a job, even world's most powerful & sophisticated investigating agencies struggle while picking up the trail and you expect PTI to come up with irrefutable money trail? Dude you're dealing with ordinary people not with NAB/FIA. Tracking trail is the job of the state's institutions, exactly what is being prayed in the petition.

Look this is not a trial, SC is not a trial court, lets not complicate it by relating it to life and death situation. No one has been indicted. Even if Sharifs are found guilty, the case will still go to a trial court for trial.

That's why it takes so long to prepare the case concerning the case of corruption. You guys make it sound too fantasy for dream world which does contradict to the real world we live in.

Not PTI, Prosecutors have to prove irrefutable money trail. Otherwise, the plaintiff might get away if the story of plaintiff checks out if the whole case is riding on the plaintiff to provide with the documented evidence.

If the world was so simple, there would be no corruption all over the mankind.

No one has been indicated because of lack of evidences? Even allegedly murders get away from the murder charges due to lack of evidence or testimony [once check out by Police investigation].

I know it is not fair, but look at the positive, the same policy will overrule in favor of innocents too if the allegation are hurled against them.



Whats emotional overruling in it? Do you want me to recapitulate the statements passed on the floor of the house, clippings and stance taken in the court? Father negating son, son negating father, brother negating sister etc.

Emotional Alert. Aside from joking, apparently you are not familiar with the court system. It is excruciating slow, boring and very repetitive, yet so predictable in the line of questioning, gathering information, exchange documentation in the process of the court. The judge will have to take all the information into the account, and only then, the judge will base its ruling on the evidence as presented. So the evidence better not be circumstantial if the plaintiff's story checks out.

But what you are doing right now is asking for mistrial.
 
.
Given the process of the case, i doubt that is case since i repeatedly said the corruption charge is very serious matter. That's why i find circumstantial or indirect evidence speculative at best unless there is exception which i am yet to find example yet taking the case of Khawaja Asif into the account

What you doubt? There's nothing doubtful in this case, as for as the nature is concern. What you call exception basically is a precedent which you can't in Pakistan, exactly what I said in para 3 of post 185. No one convicted for corruption hence no precedent to refer.

Care to entertain what do you think the reasons for judgement of SC might be. Because i am beginning to find your point speculative at best.

Didn't I say we are yet to find recorded reason? I haven't speculated anything, I specifically referred to media reports, if you could recall. Can I flip the question? I don't find any similarity between two cases, altogether different in every possible aspect, already have explained why. Going by your logic every appeal dismissed to date is an example to refer!

Here, reference to cases similar in nature.

Disqualification of Mr. Yusaf Raza Gillani reported as PLD 2012 SC 466 & PLD 2012 SC 553)
Benazir Bhutto’s case qua Representation of People Act 1976 reported as PLD 1988 SC 416)
NICL Scam (Suo Moto Case No. 18 of 2010)
HAJJ Scam (Suo Moto Case No. 24 of 2010)
Bank of Punjab Case reported as PLD 2010 SC 1109
Evacuee Trust Property Case (Suo Moto Case No. 9 of 2011)
Sindh Land Allotment Case (Suo Moto Case No. 14 of 2009)
New Murree Project Case reported as 2010 SCMR 361
Rental Power Case reported as 2012 SCMR 773
Steel Mills Scandal (Constitutional Petition No. 9 of 2006 & Civil Petitions Nos. 345 & 394 of 2006)
Sugar Price Issue
Murree Gas Pipeline Project
Punjab Land Allotment Case (Suo Moto Case No. 12 of 2015)
Federal Government Housing Foundation Land Scam (Suo Moto Case No.11 of 2011)
Petroleum Prices Case
Royal Palm Scandal
Islamabad Safe City Project Case
ArsalanIfftikhar Case (Suo Moto Case No. 5 of 2012)

Reality is called evidence, hard-core, concrete evidence, that something cannot be question for integrity in form of evidence. Right now, this is all speculative which won't be overruled in the process of the court.

Reality that dooesn't have hard-core, concrete evidence is not a reality, true? Prove me the existence of God.

That's why it takes so long to prepare the case concerning the case of corruption. You guys make it sound too fantasy for dream world which does contradict to the real world we live in.

Not PTI, Prosecutors have to prove irrefutable money trail. Otherwise, the plaintiff might get away if the story of plaintiff checks out if the whole case is riding on the plaintiff to provide with the documented evidence.

If the world was so simple, there would be no corruption all over the mankind.

No one has been indicated because of lack of evidences? Even allegedly murders get away from the murder charges due to lack of evidence or testimony [once check out by Police investigation].

I know it is not fair, but look at the positive, the same policy will overrule in favor of innocents too if the allegation are hurled against them.

I doubt you read my posts, do you? I have explained numerous time that PTI is not a prosecutor, PTI rather wants prosecution to do its work. Prosecutor per se is a government official, since when PTI has become government entity?

The petition are filed under article 184 and I doubt you even know what article 184 is, never mind, leave it.

Not PTI, Prosecutors have to prove irrefutable money trail. Otherwise, the plaintiff might get away if the story of plaintiff checks out if the whole case is riding on the plaintiff to provide with the documented evidence.

You want to review this part of your post? You mean defendants might get away?

That's why it takes so long to prepare the case concerning the case of corruption. You guys make it sound too fantasy for dream world which does contradict to the real world we live in.

Not PTI, Prosecutors have to prove irrefutable money trail. Otherwise, the plaintiff might get away if the story of plaintiff checks out if the whole case is riding on the plaintiff to provide with the documented evidence.

If the world was so simple, there would be no corruption all over the mankind.

No one has been indicated because of lack of evidences? Even allegedly murders get away from the murder charges due to lack of evidence or testimony [once check out by Police investigation].

I know it is not fair, but look at the positive, the same policy will overrule in favor of innocents too if the allegation are hurled against them.

Judicial system doesn't work your way either. Judicial commissions are time bound FYI.

But what you are doing right now is asking for mistrial.

Yeah, says the one who deems defendant as plaintiff.

Don't watch if you know law more than Barrister Aitzaz Ahsan.
 
.
What you doubt? There's nothing doubtful in this case, as for as the nature is concern. What you call exception basically is a precedent which you can't in Pakistan, exactly what I said in para 3 of post 185. No one convicted for corruption hence no precedent to refer.

So you want to create exception by changing trend based on the foundation of circumstantial in favor of prosecutors instead of the defendant?

Didn't I say we are yet to find recorded reason? I haven't speculated anything, I specifically referred to media reports, if you could recall. Can I flip the question? I don't find any similarity between two cases, altogether different in every possible aspect, already have explained why. Going by your logic every appeal dismissed to date is an example to refer!

You sort of did earlier whereas i am being speculative-free since i cannot make informed statement regarding the truth about the case. That's what the evidence is for. :D


Here, reference to cases similar in nature.

Disqualification of Mr. Yusaf Raza Gillani reported as PLD 2012 SC 466 & PLD 2012 SC 553)
Benazir Bhutto’s case qua Representation of People Act 1976 reported as PLD 1988 SC 416)
NICL Scam (Suo Moto Case No. 18 of 2010)
HAJJ Scam (Suo Moto Case No. 24 of 2010)
Bank of Punjab Case reported as PLD 2010 SC 1109
Evacuee Trust Property Case (Suo Moto Case No. 9 of 2011)
Sindh Land Allotment Case (Suo Moto Case No. 14 of 2009)
New Murree Project Case reported as 2010 SCMR 361
Rental Power Case reported as 2012 SCMR 773
Steel Mills Scandal (Constitutional Petition No. 9 of 2006 & Civil Petitions Nos. 345 & 394 of 2006)
Sugar Price Issue
Murree Gas Pipeline Project
Punjab Land Allotment Case (Suo Moto Case No. 12 of 2015)
Federal Government Housing Foundation Land Scam (Suo Moto Case No.11 of 2011)
Petroleum Prices Case
Royal Palm Scandal
Islamabad Safe City Project Case
ArsalanIfftikhar Case (Suo Moto Case No. 5 of 2012)

I will give you benefit of doubts for going to the great length to present the similar examples here. Now it is my turn which means borrowing my time for analyzing each cases to familiarize with. :(


Reality that dooesn't have hard-core, concrete evidence is not a reality, true? Prove me the existence of God.

No creation without A Creator. If we didn't create ourselves, rather we are created, then that is the sign of creation. If there is creation, that means there is A CREATOR. No creation without A Creator. It is called common sense.

A similar common sense would be concrete evidence to prove the accused party guilty. :D


I doubt you read my posts, do you? I have explained numerous time that PTI is not a prosecutor, PTI rather wants prosecution to do its work. Prosecutor per se is a government official, since when PTI has become government entity?

I am talking about Prosecutors, not PTI. I didn't mention about PTI. Maybe you should read my post carefully for once.


The petition are filed under article 184 and I doubt you even know what article 184 is, never mind, leave it.

You want to review this part of your post? You mean defendants might get away?

I am happy to review the article to keep the debate stimulating. No need to be personal. Look at me being personal-free. It is debate. No need to take it personal. Besides, as for plaintiff, honest mistake. Thank for pointing it out.
 
.
Now enters the Qatari prince (the patwaris have already given the licence to Qatar to rip our national treasury)


London flats were bought through Qatari investments, Sharif family tells SC

London flats were bought through Qatari investments, Sharif family tells SC
By Hasnaat Malik
Published: November 15, 2016


ISLAMABAD: Submitting documentary evidence on the ‘legitimacy’ of their assets before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his daughter, Maryam Nawaz, claimed their London apartment was bought through Qatari investments.

Along with a 397-page document consisting details of transactions as well as receipts of payments since 2011, the Sharif family submitted a letter from a Qatari prince claiming the flats were purchased through the settlement of accounts between his family’s company and the Sharif family.

Panama leaks case: PTI submits ‘evidence’ against Sharif family

PM Nawaz’s children’s counsel Akram Sheikh submitted a letter from Qatari Prince Shaikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Hamad bin Abdullah bin Jassim bin Muhammed Al Thani to the top court’s larger bench.

The letter addressing the apex court states that in 1980, Mian Muhammad Sharif (Nawaz Sharif’s father) invested 12 million Dirhams in the Al Thani company belonging to the Qatari prince’s father. “In the year 2006, the accounts in relation to the above investment were settled between Hussain Nawaz Sharif and Al Thani family, who then delivered the bearer shares of the companies referred in para 4 above to a representative of Hussain Nawaz Sharif,” the letter read.

image-5-1479191933.jpg


image-6-1479191946.jpg


However, responding to the letter Justice Khosa asked Sharif family counsel, Akram Sheikh, whether the Qatari prince will appear as witness in court. The justice also observed the letter contradicts PM’s earlier stance on the London flats.

The premier’s family submitted the documents hours before a larger bench of the Supreme Court resumed hearing of a slew of petitions filed primarily against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in the wake of Panamagate scandal.

The documents consisting of 397 pages contain details of transactions as well as receipts of payments since 2011. The documents also consist of details of PM’s wealth tax of 2011 and 2012. The premier has also submitted nomination papers and his daughter’s wealth tax details.

image-8-1479192690.jpg


image-3-1479192888.jpg


The apex court had directed all parties to submit documentary evidence in support of their claims in connection with Panama Papers leaks case by November 15.

Further, the bench expressed anger at PTI’s legal team for not submitting relevant documentary evidences in Panama case. “You have disappointed us by filing a huge number of documents which have no relevancy to this case,” the bench told PTI.

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf on Monday submitted stacks of documents to substantiate its allegation of corruption against the ruling Sharif family.

Panama Papers, a leak of classified documents of a Panama-based firm, revealed in April that three scions of the Sharif family owned offshore companies in international tax havens.

In its documentary evidence, PTI’s legal team has tried to establish that the Sharif family has owned London properties since 1993 and not since 2006 as they claim. Along with Premier Sharif, the PTI is also trying to implicate his daughter, Maryam Safdar, who is regarded as his political heir.

Sharif family laundered Rs145m to evade taxes, claims Imran

One of the certificates – dated February 7, 2006 – which bears Maryam’s signs, shows her as a ‘sole shareholder’ of Nescoll limited – one of the two companies that allegedly owned the Sharif family’s properties in London as revealed in the Panama Papers.

“The undersigned Maryam Safdar, being the sole shareholder of the company, hereby confirms the adoption of the following resolutions. It was noted LZ Nominees Limited was reappointed as a nominee director of the company.

“Thus; Resolves that reappointment of LZ Nominees Limited as nominee director for the company with effect from 13 May 2004 be and is hereby accepted and approved by the company and the sole shareholder of the company,” reads the document.

Earlier, Maryam in her reply before the Supreme Court had claimed that she was only a trustee and not a shareholder or beneficiary of the properties.

Moreover, her brother in his reply had claimed that he had purchased these properties in 2006 through the money given to him by his grandfather after selling his business in Dubai.

“According to entries in Her Majesty’s Land Registry the said suites are owned by the above offshore companies namely M/S Neilson and M/S Nescoll, both registered in BVI Ansbacher AG Zurich.

Maryam Nawaz still PM’s dependent, says PTI

“These companies are again operated and controlled by Mr Urs Specker. The management of these suites is being done by Mr Ridley of Dibb Lumpton Broomhead, Solicitors of London. The link of these luxury suites is beyond any speck of doubt,” reads another document in volume two.

Volume one of the PTI documents focuses on Maryam Safdar and Hussain Nawaz Sharif’s overseas assets. Volume two is mainly based on purported money laundering of Sharif family in 1980 and 1990s. In this volume, the PTI has reproduced the case prepared by Rehman Malik as the Federal Investigation Agency’s (FIA) former additional director general.

Malik sent his articulation in 1998 to then president of Pakistan, chief justice, Ehtesab commissioner and army chief during Nawaz Sharif’s second term as the prime minister. No action was taken on his investigations by any of the investigating agencies.

Volume three gives details of tax record of the Sharif family since the 1970s and details of loans the family got written off. In some of the documents, the PTI has delineated how wealth of the Sharif family multiplied and they became business in three decades.

PM Nawaz’s children submit replies in Panamagate case

Most of the documents are reproduction of record already published in media or submitted before different forums in the past. Many of the details given in these documents seem extraneous and appear to be enhancing the scope of investigations beyond Panama Papers.

“We should have provided concise record and must have remained focused on Panama leaks. There seems to be no coherence in the material submitted today,” one of the members of the PTI legal team said, while commenting on the record before the court.

PTI Chairman Imran Khan had a detailed meeting with his lead counsel Hamid Khan late in the evening. According to Ishaq Khakwani, the PTI’s 686-pages are chronicles of the Sharif family’s wrongdoings, adding it is now for the lawyers to submit summaries in their narratives.
 
.
Now enters the Qatari prince (the patwaris have already given the licence to Qatar to rip our national treasury)


London flats were bought through Qatari investments, Sharif family tells SC

London flats were bought through Qatari investments, Sharif family tells SC
By Hasnaat Malik
Published: November 15, 2016


ISLAMABAD: Submitting documentary evidence on the ‘legitimacy’ of their assets before the Supreme Court on Tuesday, Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and his daughter, Maryam Nawaz, claimed their London apartment was bought through Qatari investments.

Along with a 397-page document consisting details of transactions as well as receipts of payments since 2011, the Sharif family submitted a letter from a Qatari prince claiming the flats were purchased through the settlement of accounts between his family’s company and the Sharif family.

Panama leaks case: PTI submits ‘evidence’ against Sharif family

PM Nawaz’s children’s counsel Akram Sheikh submitted a letter from Qatari Prince Shaikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Hamad bin Abdullah bin Jassim bin Muhammed Al Thani to the top court’s larger bench.

The letter addressing the apex court states that in 1980, Mian Muhammad Sharif (Nawaz Sharif’s father) invested 12 million Dirhams in the Al Thani company belonging to the Qatari prince’s father. “In the year 2006, the accounts in relation to the above investment were settled between Hussain Nawaz Sharif and Al Thani family, who then delivered the bearer shares of the companies referred in para 4 above to a representative of Hussain Nawaz Sharif,” the letter read.

image-5-1479191933.jpg


image-6-1479191946.jpg


However, responding to the letter Justice Khosa asked Sharif family counsel, Akram Sheikh, whether the Qatari prince will appear as witness in court. The justice also observed the letter contradicts PM’s earlier stance on the London flats.

The premier’s family submitted the documents hours before a larger bench of the Supreme Court resumed hearing of a slew of petitions filed primarily against Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif in the wake of Panamagate scandal.

The documents consisting of 397 pages contain details of transactions as well as receipts of payments since 2011. The documents also consist of details of PM’s wealth tax of 2011 and 2012. The premier has also submitted nomination papers and his daughter’s wealth tax details.

image-8-1479192690.jpg


image-3-1479192888.jpg


The apex court had directed all parties to submit documentary evidence in support of their claims in connection with Panama Papers leaks case by November 15.

Further, the bench expressed anger at PTI’s legal team for not submitting relevant documentary evidences in Panama case. “You have disappointed us by filing a huge number of documents which have no relevancy to this case,” the bench told PTI.

The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf on Monday submitted stacks of documents to substantiate its allegation of corruption against the ruling Sharif family.

Panama Papers, a leak of classified documents of a Panama-based firm, revealed in April that three scions of the Sharif family owned offshore companies in international tax havens.

In its documentary evidence, PTI’s legal team has tried to establish that the Sharif family has owned London properties since 1993 and not since 2006 as they claim. Along with Premier Sharif, the PTI is also trying to implicate his daughter, Maryam Safdar, who is regarded as his political heir.

Sharif family laundered Rs145m to evade taxes, claims Imran

One of the certificates – dated February 7, 2006 – which bears Maryam’s signs, shows her as a ‘sole shareholder’ of Nescoll limited – one of the two companies that allegedly owned the Sharif family’s properties in London as revealed in the Panama Papers.

“The undersigned Maryam Safdar, being the sole shareholder of the company, hereby confirms the adoption of the following resolutions. It was noted LZ Nominees Limited was reappointed as a nominee director of the company.

“Thus; Resolves that reappointment of LZ Nominees Limited as nominee director for the company with effect from 13 May 2004 be and is hereby accepted and approved by the company and the sole shareholder of the company,” reads the document.

Earlier, Maryam in her reply before the Supreme Court had claimed that she was only a trustee and not a shareholder or beneficiary of the properties.

Moreover, her brother in his reply had claimed that he had purchased these properties in 2006 through the money given to him by his grandfather after selling his business in Dubai.

“According to entries in Her Majesty’s Land Registry the said suites are owned by the above offshore companies namely M/S Neilson and M/S Nescoll, both registered in BVI Ansbacher AG Zurich.

Maryam Nawaz still PM’s dependent, says PTI

“These companies are again operated and controlled by Mr Urs Specker. The management of these suites is being done by Mr Ridley of Dibb Lumpton Broomhead, Solicitors of London. The link of these luxury suites is beyond any speck of doubt,” reads another document in volume two.

Volume one of the PTI documents focuses on Maryam Safdar and Hussain Nawaz Sharif’s overseas assets. Volume two is mainly based on purported money laundering of Sharif family in 1980 and 1990s. In this volume, the PTI has reproduced the case prepared by Rehman Malik as the Federal Investigation Agency’s (FIA) former additional director general.

Malik sent his articulation in 1998 to then president of Pakistan, chief justice, Ehtesab commissioner and army chief during Nawaz Sharif’s second term as the prime minister. No action was taken on his investigations by any of the investigating agencies.

Volume three gives details of tax record of the Sharif family since the 1970s and details of loans the family got written off. In some of the documents, the PTI has delineated how wealth of the Sharif family multiplied and they became business in three decades.

PM Nawaz’s children submit replies in Panamagate case

Most of the documents are reproduction of record already published in media or submitted before different forums in the past. Many of the details given in these documents seem extraneous and appear to be enhancing the scope of investigations beyond Panama Papers.

“We should have provided concise record and must have remained focused on Panama leaks. There seems to be no coherence in the material submitted today,” one of the members of the PTI legal team said, while commenting on the record before the court.

PTI Chairman Imran Khan had a detailed meeting with his lead counsel Hamid Khan late in the evening. According to Ishaq Khakwani, the PTI’s 686-pages are chronicles of the Sharif family’s wrongdoings, adding it is now for the lawyers to submit summaries in their narratives.


one thing is evident from this letter that NS have business interests in other countries & recent mega projects with Qatar also seem suspicious now especially that huge LNG deal. LNG was bought at 14.5$ per MMBTU while due to record fall in oil prices LNG is available in international market at 9.5$ per MMBTU. All those kickbacks & commission reports are making sense now !!
 
.
one thing is evident from this letter that NS have business interests in other countries & recent mega projects with Qatar also seem suspicious now especially that huge LNG deal. LNG was bought at 14.5$ per MMBTU while due to record fall in oil prices LNG is available in international market at 9.5$ per MMBTU. All those kickbacks & commission reports are making sense now !!
Exactly and this should also be investigated and raised in SC by the PTI lawyers.

Dr Shahid has a great take on this :)

 
. . .
PTI really needs to shift their focus to real issues. If they dont have any evidence they must pull out the case against PM rather than wasting our
 
.
Whatever evidence is presented - No Powerful (read Zardari and Sharif) can be convicted ever in Pakistan. Period
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom