PakSword
MODERATOR
- Joined
- Dec 6, 2015
- Messages
- 19,505
- Reaction score
- 103
- Country
- Location
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Parliament kay andar aur bahir farq talaash karain.....
@Emmie @Farah Sohail @Doordie @El_Swordsmen @Verve @mr.robot
Prime Mininster's children / family should just file fine payment for 2-10 Million USD and just get it over with already and just claim , we don't have paper record of transfer end of story (Settlement with Tax Bureue)
Internationally any tax dealins over 5 years are normallly considered obsolete if there was no objection raised to these claims
Kiya long drama laga rakha hai , for past few years
There can be plea bargain also. which will be peanuts.Prime Mininster's children / family should just file fine payment for 2-10 Million USD and just get it over with already and just claim , we don't have paper record of transfer end of story (Settlement with Tax Bureue)
Internationally any tax dealins over 5 years are normallly considered obsolete if there was no objection raised to these claims
Kiya long drama laga rakha hai , for past few years
One thing though..tht Supreme court had rejected istasna in Yousuf Raza Gilani's case.. Infact in tht case, speaker of national assembly had also given ruling in Yusuf Raza Gilani's favor... But SC still rejected
But now since Nawaz Sharif is a darling of our judiciary and establishment, so cant say tht whether same rule will apply here too
One thing though..tht Supreme court had rejected istasna in Yousuf Raza Gilani's case.. Infact in tht case, speaker of national assembly had also given ruling in Yusuf Raza Gilani's favor... But SC still rejected
But now since Nawaz Sharif is a darling of our judiciary and establishment, so cant say tht whether same rule will apply here too
Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed alias pakora-philic judge.“Privilege of parliamentarians to say something in Parliament is not absolute under Article 66 of the Constitution,”
“These were not regular parliamentary proceedings as the prime minister himself volunteered to say something on the Panama Papers issue,” Justice Khosa said. “Committing a crime is not performance of official duty and the Parliament is not an island where you can do whatever you want,” he added.
Justice Sheikh Azmat Saeed alias pakora-philic judge.
Justice Asif Khosa while giving nightmares to counsel and his client.
http://tribune.com.pk/story/1297701/pm-seeks-immunity-article-248-panamagate-case/
Seems like the cat has got Justice Ejaz Afzal's tongue.