Regarding the font issue, as we discussed yesterday and as
@Radd-ul-Fasaad has also put the response of Lucas in an earlier post, to challenge the finding, she will have to prove that she (or whoever prepared that document) was using the beta version for testing purposes.
Also, other evidences (and they are not just circumstantial evidences, but actual confirmations from two different governments) are so strong that there is no way they can even think of challenging this finding by the forensic investigators.
Regarding other things, since I was also a part of a few fraud investigations while working with a big4, it will be interesting to see if the organization can be termed as expert witness in this case. If they have provided their opinion as "expert" opinion and are authorized to become forensic experts under UK laws, we will have to see if they have agreed to present themselves in Pakistani courts for this purpose. To get the "expert witness" opinion, a different kind of agreement is signed, and I hope JIT has procured the firm's services as an expert witness.
If this is the case, to challenge an expert witness opinion, Shareefs will need to bring another expert opinion
"to create doubt" that contradicts the first opinion. This is what I was saying that there are cases where two different experts give different opinions in the court. In such a case, circumstantial evidence has to be examined. Here, shareefs are in deep shit because tons of circumstantial, as well as confirmed evidence is available that can negate their stance in minutes.
However, I would like Shareefs to challenge every word of this report, not just this opinion as I want to see continuous ZALALAT at the hands of PTI and awam at least for another three months..
@Accountant @Farah Sohail
