What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Fig2.jpg


Also i just googled that image. its a survey done between July 16, 2014 to August 6, 2014. PTI goverment had been in power for just 1 year. KPK police reforms which you hate so much were applied in Aug 2016.
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1154597/major-reforms-govt-issues-much-awaited-police-ordinance/

Another interesting fact about the survey you quoted for your defence stats that total people surveyed from all over the country = 3065 (seriously out of 200 million they did a survey of 3065, and it doesn't even give the break-down of where the people were from).

Please alteast try harder to justify the crap that you post here, better yet stop BSing all together and if you really want to do a comparison atleast base it on the truth.
 
.
Wah wah.. aaj tou ronaq lagi huee hai iss thread pe..

Yaar ghenday @save_ghenda , aap daily aajaya karo..

Waisay your name is perfect.. SAVE GHENDA.. It suggests you are requesting others to save NS...

Ministry of Panama Defence

:rofl::rofl::rofl: Perfect man!

Also i just googled that image. its a survey done between July 16, 2014 to August 6, 2014. PTI goverment had been in power for just 1 year. KPK police reforms which you hate so much were applied in Aug 2016.
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1154597/major-reforms-govt-issues-much-awaited-police-ordinance/

Another interesting fact about the survey you quoted for your defence stats that total people surveyed from all over the country = 3065 (seriously out of 200 million they did a survey of 3065, and it doesn't even give the break-down of where the people were from).

Please alteast try harder to justify the crap that you post here, better yet stop BSing all together and if you really want to do a comparison atleast base it on the truth.

KPK main Maulana Fazl ur Rahman ke halqay main kia gaya tha...

its not an international survey

Uss ne kaha tou hai it is "an international inspired survey".. Hahaha.. Mian Manan tou nahi hai yeh @save_ghenda ?
 
.
Hello folks - @Farah Sohail @Imad.Khan @PakSword @Verve @Guvera - anybody facing issues with sub forums not displaying properly - I logged in from my various devices and each and every device from two different cities are showing peculiar display - any idea - how can that be fixed?
I'll take leave - till this gets fixed as it's almost impossible to figure out where to type as mostly I type on my phones during travelling - and I despise typing on phone :)

Talk to you guys later and participate in discussions, till then keep up the great work having informative and healthy debates - adios!
 
.
Hello folks - @Farah Sohail @Imad.Khan @PakSword @Verve @Guvera - anybody facing issues with sub forums not displaying properly - I logged in from my various devices and each and every device from two different cities are showing peculiar display - any idea - how can that be fixed?
I'll take leave - till this gets fixed as it's almost impossible to figure out where to type as mostly I type on my phones during travelling - and I despise typing on phone :)

Talk to you guys later and participate in discussions, till then keep up the great work having informative and healthy debates - adios!
Yes..i have been facing these issues with pdf since yesterday
 
.
Hello folks - @Farah Sohail @Imad.Khan @PakSword @Verve @Guvera - anybody facing issues with sub forums not displaying properly - I logged in from my various devices and each and every device from two different cities are showing peculiar display - any idea - how can that be fixed?
I'll take leave - till this gets fixed as it's almost impossible to figure out where to type as mostly I type on my phones during travelling - and I despise typing on phone :)

Talk to you guys later and participate in discussions, till then keep up the great work having informative and healthy debates - adios!

I am not having any issues
 
.
Hello folks - @Farah Sohail @Imad.Khan @PakSword @Verve @Guvera - anybody facing issues with sub forums not displaying properly - I logged in from my various devices and each and every device from two different cities are showing peculiar display - any idea - how can that be fixed?
I'll take leave - till this gets fixed as it's almost impossible to figure out where to type as mostly I type on my phones during travelling - and I despise typing on phone :)

Talk to you guys later and participate in discussions, till then keep up the great work having informative and healthy debates - adios!

Not facing any issues. You should clear your cookies and try using the desktop version of the website.
 
. .
@Farah Sohail

What's in this video, could you please tell..


Akram asked asked SC ke Imran Khan ke 97 main jo nomination papers aur asstes declaration ka bhi record liya jaye jis par CJ ne kaha ..ke aap ka ye case nahi hai.. Aap ka case Niazi services ka hai... Aaj SC ne EC main jo cases chal rahay hain, IK ki foreign funding aur EC ki jurisdiction ke baaray main..un cases ka record mangaya hai... CJ ne Naeem Bukhari se kaha ke Imran khan par ye ilzam kiun lagaya gaya hai ke woh Sadiq aur Ameen nahi hian? Kia unke liye Niazi services ko zahir karna zuroori tha? Naeem Bukhari said ke...ke Imran khan became MNA in 2002.. Us waqt unhon ne flat declare kar diya tha us waqt...

Yeh tu is vid main tha.. Main samaa ke tickers bhi dekh rahi thee.. Aaj Naeem bukhari ka koi bura din nahi tha.. Naeem bukhari ne aagay achay arguments diye hain, aur SC ne sunay bhi hain.. NB said ke niazi services ka ek hi asset tha, yeh flat...iske ilaawa unka koi aur asset nahi tha..SC ne kaha ke kia yeh prove karsaktay hain? Bani gala ki money tail ke baaray main bhi baat hui hai.. NB ne us par bhi arguments diye hain.. Mujhe lagta hai ke atleast yeh niazi services aur bani gala wala matter tu dismiss hojayega...is main tu clean chit mil hi jayegi... Ab kal EC se record aayega.. Us par dkehna hai ke kia hota hai?
 
.
Akram asked asked SC ke Imran Khan ke 97 main jo nomination papers aur asstes declaration ka bhi record liya jaye jis par CJ ne kaha ..ke aap ka ye case nahi hai.. Aap ka case Niazi services ka hai... Aaj SC ne EC main jo cases chal rahay hain, IK ki foreign funding aur EC ki jurisdiction ke baaray main..un cases ka record mangaya hai... CJ ne Naeem Bukhari se kaha ke Imran khan par ye ilzam kiun lagaya gaya hai ke woh Sadiq aur Ameen nahi hian? Kia unke liye Niazi services ko zahir karna zuroori tha? Naeem Bukhari said ke...ke Imran khan became MNA in 2002.. Us waqt unhon ne flat declare kar diya tha us waqt...

Yeh tu is vid main tha.. Main samaa ke tickers bhi dekh rahi thee.. Aaj Naeem bukhari ka koi bura din nahi tha.. Naeem bukhari ne aagay achay arguments diye hain, aur SC ne sunay bhi hain.. NB said ke niazi services ka ek hi asset tha, yeh flat...iske ilaawa unka koi aur asset nahi tha..SC ne kaha ke kia yeh prove karsaktay hain? Bani gala ki money tail ke baaray main bhi baat hui hai.. NB ne us par bhi arguments diye hain.. Mujhe lagta hai ke atleast yeh niazi services aur bani gala wala matter tu dismiss hojayega...is main tu clean chit mil hi jayegi... Ab kal EC se record aayega.. Us par dkehna hai ke kia hota hai?

Many thanks...

Niazi Services declare nahi ki thi IK ne.. Lekin uss ka iklota asset declare kardia tha.. Shayad isi liey CJ NB se prove karnay ka keh rahay hain ke aik asset sabit karain.

Kia case hai waisay PMLN ka.. agar company zahir nahi ki gaee jis ki value without asset 1 pound sterling hai, lekin jo asset iss se attached hai (jo ke asal asset tha with value) woh declare kardia gaya hai.. now PMLN is saying ke since that company hasn't been declared, IK sadiq aur ameen nahi raha..

Lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Chalo yeh acha hua...

JIT’s sub-committees start scrutiny of PM’s assets declaration

This is what this video all about I believe..


JIT tou bullet train ki tarah kaam kar rahi hai..
 
.
Many thanks...

Niazi Services declare nahi ki thi IK ne.. Lekin uss ka iklota asset declare kardia tha.. Shayad isi liey CJ NB se prove karnay ka keh rahay hain ke aik asset sabit karain.

Kia case hai waisay PMLN ka.. agar company zahir nahi ki gaee jis ki value without asset 1 pound sterling hai, lekin jo asset iss se attached hai (jo ke asal asset tha with value) woh declare kardia gaya hai.. now PMLN is saying ke since that company hasn't been declared, IK sadiq aur ameen nahi raha..

Lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Chalo yeh acha hua...

JIT’s sub-committees start scrutiny of PM’s assets declaration

This is what this video all about I believe..


JIT tou bullet train ki tarah kaam kar rahi hai..
Many thanks...

Niazi Services declare nahi ki thi IK ne.. Lekin uss ka iklota asset declare kardia tha.. Shayad isi liey CJ NB se prove karnay ka keh rahay hain ke aik asset sabit karain.

Kia case hai waisay PMLN ka.. agar company zahir nahi ki gaee jis ki value without asset 1 pound sterling hai, lekin jo asset iss se attached hai (jo ke asal asset tha with value) woh declare kardia gaya hai.. now PMLN is saying ke since that company hasn't been declared, IK sadiq aur ameen nahi raha..

Lollllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll

Chalo yeh acha hua...

JIT’s sub-committees start scrutiny of PM’s assets declaration

This is what this video all about I believe..


JIT tou bullet train ki tarah kaam kar rahi hai..

SC ne aaj kuch dates ka matter bhi uthaya hai.. CJ ne kaha hai end main...ke sach ke liye jo bhi tehqeeq karani pari ..karein ge..jo record chahye hua..maangein ge.. Bani gala ki sab adaayegi tu jan main complete hogayi thee... Phir jemima ne june tak kiun imran khan ko payment ki? Jemima ne rashid khan ko jo paisy diye thay.. Rashid khan ne imran khan tak woh paisy kaisy bhejay? Uski money trail dein.. Aaj Naeem Bukhari ne kaha tha ke SC Imran khan ke tax returns FBR se manaa ley.. Tu CJ ne kaha ..ke Imran Khan khud ye tqeuest FBR main de dein aur phir woh record yahan le aayein...

SC ne NB ko kaha ke umeed hai ke aap humaray sab sawal samajh gaye honge... NB ne kaha ke next hearing tak mazeed jawab de dun ga...

Waisy mujhe abhi bhi lagta hai ke ye wala case prob nahi karay ga.. Bas yeh na ho ke zuroorat na bhi ho..lekin SC panama case se similarity dikhanay ke liye yahan bhi commission bana dey lekin ab tak aisi zuroorat lag t nahi rahi..

Waisy JIT tu waqayi bhtt zabardast kam karrahi hai.. Infact jo cheez media par aati hai, i think woh atleast 3-4 days baad aati hai.. Jo kaam JIT 3-4 din pehlay karchuki hoti hai, uski news phir baad main aati hai... Jo aaj PM ke tax aur assets scruitny ki report aayi hai..hosakta hai ye kam ab tak complete bhi hochuka ho.. JIT has impressed me a lot
 
.
SC ne aaj kuch dates ka matter bhi uthaya hai.. CJ ne kaha hai end main...ke sach ke liye jo bhi tehqeeq karani pari ..karein ge..jo record chahye hua..maangein ge.. Bani gala ki sab adaayegi tu jan main complete hogayi thee... Phir jemima ne june tak kiun imran khan ko payment ki? Jemima ne rashid khan ko jo paisy diye thay.. Rashid khan ne imran khan tak woh paisy kaisy bhejay? Uski money trail dein.. Aaj Naeem Bukhari ne kaha tha ke SC Imran khan ke tax returns FBR se manaa ley.. Tu CJ ne kaha ..ke Imran Khan khud ye tqeuest FBR main de dein aur phir woh record yahan le aayein...

SC ne NB ko kaha ke umeed hai ke aap humaray sab sawal samajh gaye honge... NB ne kaha ke next hearing tak mazeed jawab de dun ga...

Waisy mujhe abhi bhi lagta hai ke ye wala case prob nahi karay ga.. Bas yeh na ho ke zuroorat na bhi ho..lekin SC panama case se similarity dikhanay ke liye yahan bhi commission bana dey lekin ab tak aisi zuroorat lag t nahi rahi..

Waisy JIT tu waqayi bhtt zabardast kam karrahi hai.. Infact jo cheez media par aati hai, i think woh atleast 3-4 days baad aati hai.. Jo kaam JIT 3-4 din pehlay karchuki hoti hai, uski news phir baad main aati hai... Jo aaj PM ke tax aur assets scruitny ki report aayi hai..hosakta hai ye kam ab tak complete bhi hochuka ho.. JIT has impressed me a lot

Thanks... Video title says "JIT Sub-Committees". FIA ka tou hum pehlay discuss karchukay hain 5-6 experts ki team kaam kar rahi hai. Kia doosray members ne bhi sub teams banai huee hain.?

Waisy mujhe abhi bhi lagta hai ke ye wala case prob nahi karay ga.. Bas yeh na ho ke zuroorat na bhi ho..lekin SC panama case se similarity dikhanay ke liye yahan bhi commission bana dey lekin ab tak aisi zuroorat lag t nahi rahi..

Mujhay bhi aisa lagta hai ke iss case se tou nikal jaega.
 
.
Thanks... Video title says "JIT Sub-Committees". FIA ka tou hum pehlay discuss karchukay hain 5-6 experts ki team kaam kar rahi hai. Kia doosray members ne bhi sub teams banai huee hain.?
Mujhay bhi aisa lagta hai ke iss case se tou nikal jaega.
Mera khyal hai ke sab separtments ki sub teams hain.. JIT bannay ke baad jo TORs SC ne diye thay..us main yeh bhi tha ke aap log apnay deptts ki sub teams banaa saktay hain, comprising of ppl of your choice.. Apnay deptts se jo bhi help chahye ho..woh le saktay hain
 
.
SC finds discrepancies in Imran's money trail to Banigala land

Serious discrepancies have been found in the money trail provided by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan regarding the purchase of more than 300 kanals in Banigala on which the politician has built his house.

A three-judge bench of apex court headed by Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar on Thursday, raised nine questions regarding Khan’s money trail. The bench questioned how the PTI chief’s agent Rashid Khan paid the seller nine months before having received the amount from Jemima Khan.


Further, the bench not only raised questions over the construction documents, but also asked Khan to provide complete records of Jemima’s bank statement, as details regarding how she transferred the amount to Rashid’s account were missing.

Unsatisfied with the revenue record regarding the transfer of land in Jemima’s name, the bench asked Khan how he would reconcile the record. Questions were also raised over Khan’s failure to disclose his ownership of an offshore company in 2002 nomination papers.

“We will go to any extent to find the truth in this case”, CJ Nisar observed during the hearing, as the bench sought complete records of PTI’s foreign funding case from Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

Further, the bench directed PTI counsel Naeem Bukhari to provide assistance over how offshore companies are being formed and what is the motive for owning one. The hearing of the case has been adjourned till Tuesday, May 30.

On Tuesday, Khan told the Supreme Court that it was accusations such as ‘Zionist lobby’ and ‘purchase of antique tiles’ levelled on Jemima Khan by the Sharifs “that ended their marriage in divorce and forced his former wife to leave the country”. Khan was referring to the political campaign of the late 1990s launched against him by his political opponents. When they got nothing against him, he said, they found Jemima and targeted her Jewish family background. It was in those days that a case was registered against Jemima for illegally exporting hundreds of antique tiles to the UK.

“In 2002, having been hounded by allegations of still being part of the Jewish lobby and a false case [instituted] by the Sharifs of illegally taking out antique tiles (which had [actually] been purchased in a shop in the federal capital and were anything but antique) for which an FIR was also filed, Jemima Khan took our two children and moved back to London,” says Khan in his 10-page affidavit submitted in the apex court on Tuesday.

The affidavit was submitted in reply to a petition filed by PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi, seeking disqualification of the PTI chief for giving contradictory statements about ownership of the Banigala land.

@PakSword ye tu kuch slightly diff picture paint karrahay hain
 
.
SC finds discrepancies in Imran's money trail to Banigala land

Serious discrepancies have been found in the money trail provided by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan regarding the purchase of more than 300 kanals in Banigala on which the politician has built his house.

A three-judge bench of apex court headed by Chief Justice Mian Saqib Nisar on Thursday, raised nine questions regarding Khan’s money trail. The bench questioned how the PTI chief’s agent Rashid Khan paid the seller nine months before having received the amount from Jemima Khan.


Further, the bench not only raised questions over the construction documents, but also asked Khan to provide complete records of Jemima’s bank statement, as details regarding how she transferred the amount to Rashid’s account were missing.

Unsatisfied with the revenue record regarding the transfer of land in Jemima’s name, the bench asked Khan how he would reconcile the record. Questions were also raised over Khan’s failure to disclose his ownership of an offshore company in 2002 nomination papers.

“We will go to any extent to find the truth in this case”, CJ Nisar observed during the hearing, as the bench sought complete records of PTI’s foreign funding case from Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP).

Further, the bench directed PTI counsel Naeem Bukhari to provide assistance over how offshore companies are being formed and what is the motive for owning one. The hearing of the case has been adjourned till Tuesday, May 30.

On Tuesday, Khan told the Supreme Court that it was accusations such as ‘Zionist lobby’ and ‘purchase of antique tiles’ levelled on Jemima Khan by the Sharifs “that ended their marriage in divorce and forced his former wife to leave the country”. Khan was referring to the political campaign of the late 1990s launched against him by his political opponents. When they got nothing against him, he said, they found Jemima and targeted her Jewish family background. It was in those days that a case was registered against Jemima for illegally exporting hundreds of antique tiles to the UK.

“In 2002, having been hounded by allegations of still being part of the Jewish lobby and a false case [instituted] by the Sharifs of illegally taking out antique tiles (which had [actually] been purchased in a shop in the federal capital and were anything but antique) for which an FIR was also filed, Jemima Khan took our two children and moved back to London,” says Khan in his 10-page affidavit submitted in the apex court on Tuesday.

The affidavit was submitted in reply to a petition filed by PML-N leader Hanif Abbasi, seeking disqualification of the PTI chief for giving contradictory statements about ownership of the Banigala land.

@PakSword ye tu kuch slightly diff picture paint karrahay hain

Express Tribune ko aadat hai click bait type articles ki. IK iss case se tou asani se nikal jaega in shaa Allah
 
. .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom