Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[Farah Sohail]

My English is not good.. so many mistakes..

You can write and then we can together add/ edit.. what do you think?

I think yours is perfect.....

U really think... I am good at writing??? Dont think so...

I dont think..i will be able to draft it the way.. I want it to be...

I seriously want them to know..tht how much their courage and righteousness is appreciated by us..and we are indebted to them for retaining our little faith in judiciary

 

[PakSword]

I think yours is perfect.....

U really think... I am good at writing??? Dont think so...

I dont think..i will be able to draft it the way.. I want it to be...

I seriously want them to know..tht how much their courage and righteousness is appreciated by us..and we are indebted to them for retaining our little faith in judiciary

OK, now you have given two tasks to me.. (1) Opening a thread (2) Writing a letter.

Let me do it by Thursday in shaa Allah.. I really need to write with my head and heart together.. Right now, I am so depressed, inn ki bhi kaheen watt hi na lagadun..

OK main tou chala.. yahan tou Fajar honay wali hai thori der baad..

 

[Farah Sohail]

OK, now you have given two tasks to me.. (1) Opening a thread (2) Writing a letter.

Let me do it by Thursday in shaa Allah.. I really need to write with my head and heart together.. Right now, I am so depressed, inn ki bhi kaheen watt hi na lagadun..

@bold

Thanks in advance

 

[Realistic Change]

As expected this case has become a laughing stock for this bench and will be remembered exactly like Z.A. Butto's hanging - for decades - that's one thing was rightly claimed by the bench.

 

[Verve]

@Farah Sohail write in your own words, you can express just fine. Urdu, if you prefer. But your own words.

 

[Realistic Change]

Sharif suits Army-Period.

If you were COAS would you want a puppet or a headstrong guy which can potentially create issues.

Army has its hands full and they don't want any headstrong guy.

You can disagree - but that's what's been happening and will happen again - yes, 2018 will be of Sharifs or may I say Safdars.

As of now everyone knows that next PM is Maryam Safdar and in 2023 too - in 2028 we can possibly see a change of face in Mehr un Nisa Safdar Sharif as new PM.

 

[Mansoon]

As of now everyone knows that next PM is Maryam Safdar and in 2023 too - in 2028 we can possibly see a change of face in Mehr un Nisa Safdar Sharif as new PM.

Are you on Koolaid bro?

As expected this case has become a laughing stock for this bench and will be remembered exactly like Z.A. Butto's hanging - for decades - that's one thing was rightly claimed by the bench.

The bench exposed Nawaz Sharif. What more did you need?

 

[AUz]

The bench exposed Nawaz Sharif. What more did you need?

Prosecution.

That's what justice system is there for.

Bc "expose" to hum log internet pe baith k b kr sktay hain. Pakistan needed a strong statement from our justice department..that would have established a very strong precedent.

But no, 3 judges disappointed us all

 

[Mansoon]

Prosecution.

That's what justice system is there for.

Bc "expose" to hum log internet pe baith k b kr sktay hain. Pakistan needed a strong statement from our justice department..that would have established a very strong precedent.

But no, 3 judges disappointed us all

They won't after 2 months.

 

[Mrc]

Aap log pehlay yeah decide kerlo k faislay pay jashn manna hay ya k issay reject kerna hay

 

[fatman17]

Q: have members taken the time to read the 549 page judgement or are making comments based on media reports. take the time to read it esp justice khosa note.

 

[fatman17]

Columnist Ejaz Haider

 

[fatman17]

Says it all

 

[Realistic Change]

Are you on Koolaid bro?


The bench exposed Nawaz Sharif. What more did you need?

Nawaz Sharif was already exposed - even if two judges did not write dissenting note it wouldn't change the known fact that Nawaz Sharif is corrupt.

My points were:

1. SC ridiculed NAB, FIA, SBP and termed Qamar Zaman as Chairman of NAB equivalent to legalizing corruption. Hence total no confidence in all of the before mentioned institutions.

2. Only defence Nawaz Sharif had was the Qatari letter and it was termed as "absurd and ludicrous" by the judges and was referred as childish attempt to hide truth.

Based on the above two statements how can it say in order as follows:

1. All of the above failed, corrupt to the core NAB, FIA, SBP, SECP investigate the PM - and if PM did not give any answer to 5 judges then what special 19 or 20/21 Grade officer will do that will bring the truth out in open.

and....

2. If the Qatari letter was dismissed and thrown out - then what on earth was the defence of Nawaz Sharif re the money trail. If that evidence was not considered then the whole case of Nawaz had crumbled and there was no need to re-establish the fact from lower level/powered JIT in comparison to bench of 5 senior most judges.

-------------------------------------------

If above scenarios make sense to you then please explain the rationale of JIT of this style on which Supreme Court has already documented its absolute No Confidence in the same judgment.

 

[fatman17]

Nawaz Sharif was already exposed - even if two judges did not write dissenting note it wouldn't change the known fact that Nawaz Sharif is corrupt.

My points were:

1. SC ridiculed NAB, FIA, SBP and termed Qamar Zaman as Chairman of NAB equivalent to legalizing corruption. Hence total no confidence in all of the before mentioned institutions.

2. Only defence Nawaz Sharif had was the Qatari letter and it was termed as "absurd and ludicrous" by the judges and was referred as childish attempt to hide truth.

Based on the above two statements how can it say in order as follows:

1. All of the above failed, corrupt to the core NAB, FIA, SBP, SECP investigate the PM - and if PM did not give any answer to 5 judges then what special will 19 or 20 Grade officer will do that will bring the truth out in open.

2. If the Qatari letter was dismissed and thrown out - then what on earth was the defence of Nawaz Sharif re the money trail. If that evidence was not considered then the whole case of Nawaz had crumbled and there was no need to re-establish the fact from lower level/powered JIT in comparison to bench of 5 senior most judges.

-------------------------------------------

If above scenarios make sense to you then please explain the rationale of JIT of this style on which Supreme Court has already documented its absolute No Confidence in the same judgment.

Judges cannot do everything. They need assistance from relevant quarters. l don't like the JIT idea myself but that's the reality.