Just some bits I find worth highlighting ...
"Be that as it may, that issue is not strictly relevant to the case in hand. The declaration by this Court through the present judgment regarding
lack of honesty of respondent No. 1 cannot by undone or ignored by the Speaker/Chairman or the Election Commission of Pakistan and such a declaration has to have an automatic effect." - Pages 165-166
"We must not forget that the so-called
moral provisions of Articles 62 and 63 of the Constitution are meant to be enforced even against those who claim to have popular support or who have already demonstrated their popular endorsement and, thus, popular support or endorsement of the person concerned has absolutely nothing to do with enforcement of those provisions of the Constitution." <---
on 62/63!! - page 167
"therefore,
I see no reason why after restoration of respondent No. 10’s status as an accused person in that case reinvestigation to his extent and filing of a Reference against him cannot be undertaken or resorted to. ..... The stark reality is that the allegations of corruption, corrupt practices and money laundering, etc. involving over Rs. 1.2 billion and prosecution on the basis of such allegations had been scuttled by the High Court and this Court would not like to stand in the way of reopening of the said investigation or prosecution where even the smallest opening for such investigation or prosecution is available or legally possible. " <---
about Ishaq Dar - Page 179
"(vi) Similarly, the other assets acquired and the businesses set up by respondent No. 1’s children in Pakistan and abroad also need to be probed into by the National Accountability Bureau to find out whether respondent No. 1’s children have acted as Benamidars of respondent No. 1 in those assets and businesses or not and if so whether respondent No. 1 can satisfactorily account for those assets and businesses or not if he is discovered to be their actual owner." - Page 189 -
this is asking for global asset probe of the family!!
"It is, therefore, declared that after restoration of respondent No. 10’s status as an accused person in that case reinvestigation to his extent and filing of a Reference against him can be undertaken or resorted to by the National Accountability Bureau." <----
Ishaq Dar again! - Page 190
"As neutrality and impartiality of the incumbent Chairman, National Accountability Bureau Mr. Qamar Zaman Chaudhry has been found by me to be compromised in the matters of respondent No. 1, therefore,
he is directed not to exercise any power, authority or function in respect of the matters directed above. The Honourable Chief Justice of Pakistan is requested to constitute an Implementation Bench of this Court in the above mentioned regard and in the interest of doing complete justice it is ordered that
all the powers, authority and functions of the Chairman, National Accountability Bureau in the above mentioned matters of respondents No. 1 shall henceforth be exercised by the said Implementation Bench and the relevant officials of the National Accountability Bureau shall seek all the necessary orders in those matters from the Implementation Bench till Mr. Qamar Zaman Chaudhry completes his current non-extendable term of office." <---
about NAB Chairman and powers of NAB in regards to investigation of Nawaz by JIT - Page 191
---------------------------------------
I think there will be a petition in ECP very soon! ECP can't ignore 2 senior most judges declaring NS disqualified!
2 judges saying disqualified under 62/63 - i.e. NS is convicted
3 judges saying investigate all wealth - i.e. NS stands accused and should be investigated
None of the 3 judges said that NS is 'honest' where 2 has said he is dishonest and can't be denied.
So that declaration we were expecting is here!!!
2 say he's convicted (murjim), 3 say NS stands accused (mulsim) .... ECP here we come.
@PakSword @Farah Sohail @war&peace @Guvera @Arsalan