What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Imran and Tareen disqualification pleas: Arguments on Dec 19
28 MINS AGO BY INP
Imran-and-Tareen-disqualification-pleas-Arguments-on-Dec-19-300x253.jpg





The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) on Tuesday fixed December 19 for arguments on the petitions seeking disqualification of PTI chief Imran Khan and the party’s senior leader Jahangir Tareen as members of the parliament.

The disqualification petitions against Imran Khan and Tareen have been filed in the commission by Shahnawaz Dhillon, Malik Khalil Ahmed and Bilal Mustafa Bhutta respectively.

During the hearing, the ECP fixed the date of December 19 for arguments over the petitions.

The lawyers of Imran Khan and Jahangir Tareen objected over approving the petitions for hearing.

Imran Khan in his reply submitted in the ECP on Monday had rejected all accusations mentioned in the reference.

The lawyers of both politicians said that the references filed against their clients were baseless and beyond the legal framework.
disqualification-pleas-arguments-on-dec-19/

http://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/blo...n-disqualification-pleas-arguments-on-dec-19/
 
Last edited:
.

Abtak ki website ka tu main ne link bhi share kiya hai.. Tht i have read...

But the main point is...

When Naeem bukhari said abt article 62,63 while concluding his arguments tht PM is not sadiq ameen anymore...then our dear chief justice said..
Tht under article 184, can we even hear this case of public interest on basis of 62,63? Waah waah... The whole basis for Nawaz sharifs disqualificarion comes from article 62,63 and CJ is saying ke woh tu hum is case main sun hi nahi saktay... Waah waah... And it seems they are moving twards forming judicial comission...
 
.
What did he do?

On topic: Ok..got a summary of what happened today..but didnt understand clearly

http://abbtakk.tv/en/panamagate-case-supreme-court-resumes-hearing-of-case/

Plus..why are judges, acting as Nawaz sharif's defense lawyers?

And Chief justce even remarked..tht can we even hear the case on 62,63...in public interest case? What does tht mean? Jis basis par Nawaz Sharif ki disqualification hosakti hai..us basis ko hi Supreme court khatam karna chah rahi hai?

And Supreme court it seems..is moving towards forming a judicial commission...they even remarked tht today, and is not interested in taking this case forward on 62,63
If they act unjustly despite having all the facts and evidences, then the country will move towards the bloody revolution similar to French revolution and these disgraceful judges will be the first victim...The justice will be done but on streets and with swords and guns...an aweful but necessary outcome.
 
.
Any update..of today's hearing? What happened?

Justice Khosa said after accepting the ownership of flats it's on Shareef family now to provide money trails for the purchase of flats !!
the court is adjourned till tomorrow !!
 
.
It seems judges are not ready to accept any proofs /arguments against sharif family.. Dunya ka koi bhi saboot le aaye..judges will say..it is not THOS SABOOT...aur jis basis par Ns ki disqualification hosakti hial.usay judges maannay ko tayyar hi nahi
 
.
What did he do?

On topic: Ok..got a summary of what happened today..but didnt understand clearly

http://abbtakk.tv/en/panamagate-case-supreme-court-resumes-hearing-of-case/

Plus..why are judges, acting as Nawaz sharif's defense lawyers?

And Chief justce even remarked..tht can we even hear the case on 62,63...in public interest case? What does tht mean? Jis basis par Nawaz Sharif ki disqualification hosakti hai..us basis ko hi Supreme court khatam karna chah rahi hai?

And Supreme court it seems..is moving towards forming a judicial commission...they even remarked tht today, and is not interested in taking this case forward on 62,63

Naeem Bukhari didn't even bother to make any reference to famous queen bench division judgement, that's interesting!

Toward disqualification on 62,63, proper forum for this is ECP not SC. CJ today pointed out the same.
 
.
Justice Khosa said after accepting the ownership of flats it's on Shareef family now to provide money trails for the purchase of flats !!
the court is adjourned till tomorrow !!

But CJ remarked tht can we even hear this case, on 62,63 ..tht sadiq ameen article? Judges think tht this artcle cant be applied in this case of public interest.... This article can be the basis of Ns disqualification, but today CJ remarked tht in this public interest case, can it even apply?

Naeem Bukhari didn't even bother to make any reference to famous queen bench division judgement, that's interesting!

Toward disqualification on 62,73, proper forum for this is ECP not SC. CJ today pointed out the same.

Yes..why didnt Naeem bukhari refer to tht? Or this summary is not comprehensove?

Also the summary doesnt say anything abt Sheikh Rashid's argument in court
 
.
If they act unjustly despite having all the facts and evidences, then the country will move towards the bloody revolution similar to French revolution and these disgraceful judges will be the first victim...The justice will be done but on streets and with swords and guns...an aweful but necessary outcome.

indeed,may Allah help us free ourselves from these corrupt people
 
.
Naeem Bukhari didn't even bother to make any reference to famous queen bench division judgement, that's interesting!

Toward disqualification on 62,63, proper forum for this is ECP not SC. CJ today pointed out the same.
@Farah Sohail What games are they playing with us...Do they think they can fool people with details, jargon and intricacies... while the evidence is clear and the same court took suo moto against a trouser hanging outside the wall of their so called SC..They got to be kidding us but they will not like the consequences...enough of their subjugation
 
.
But CJ remarked tht can we even hear this case, on 62,63 ..tht sadiq ameen article? Judges think tht this artcle cant be applied in this case of public interest.... This article can be the basis of Ns disqualification, but today CJ remarked tht in this public interest case, can it even apply?

in this i agree with honorable judges, ECP is forum for such disqualification. Judges also said that in Yousaf Raza Gillani's case, the then PM was first convicted than was disqualified. If money laundering is proved against Shareefs thn NS can be disqualified. Disqualification under article 62, 63 is a matter of ECP
 
.
Abtak ki website ka tu main ne link bhi share kiya hai.. Tht i have read...

But the main point is...

When Naeem bukhari said abt article 62,63 while concluding his arguments tht PM is not sadiq ameen anymore...then our dear chief justice said..
Tht under article 184, can we even hear this case of public interest on basis of 62,63? Waah waah... The whole basis for Nawaz sharifs disqualificarion comes from article 62,63 and CJ is saying ke woh tu hum is case main sun hi nahi saktay... Waah waah... And it seems they are moving twards forming judicial comission...

It's twitter. Every argument that Naeem Bukhari presented in court, the statements made by judges, and Shaikh Rasheed's jokes, someone from Abbtak is sitting there and writing on twitter. Just go and check and you will like it. :)

Naeem Bukhari didn't even bother to make any reference to famous queen bench division judgement, that's interesting!

Toward disqualification on 62,63, proper forum for this is ECP not SC. CJ today pointed out the same.

No, he mentioned that. I will find the tweet and let you know...

Capture31.PNG



I can't believe anyone else can say this in front of 5 member bench :rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
Last edited:
.
I Still believe Sheikh Rasheed Case is Simple & Very comprehensive with a Logic, If you can disqualify 12 MPA & MNA only because of Mis Declaration/ hiding their assets & not declaring it with ECP, NS has done the same, Why can't he...
The point remains if Article 62/63 can be applicable in a case with Public Interest involved... Judges think otherwise..
 
.
yaar in short bataoo aaj huwa kya hey... kisnay kiske li hey cuz idhar lenay lonay ka chal raha hey scene... eek din judge eek ke letay hain aglay din doosray ke acha match lagaya huwa hey
 
. .
Sheikh rashid is one of its kind..lollll....:rofl::rofl::rofl:

But someone should give refrences of judgements from Islamic history too, in front of judges...and Sheikh Rashid could do tht........Plus should conclude the arguments by tht famous hadith..which said tht tum se pehli qoumein isi liye barbaad huein..ke woh taqatwar ko chor deto theen..arguments should end on tht hadith...shayad judges par koi asar hojaye...
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom