Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[Yeah Me]

 

[Shane]

Arif Hameed & Sabir Shakir saying that they got information from sources that 5 member bench will announce the verdict .... Sabir Shakir used a term that 5 member bench will be reactivated

@Farah Sohail @PakSword @Emmie

Ye cheez tu almost confirm hi hochuki hai ... Justice Khosa will announce the verdict... But whether these two will be able to add anything to their previous verdict..or not..remains to be seen..
I doubt they will be able to make any further addition

Like you say, It has become clear in recent days that the original 5 member bench had given an interim order and the actual judgement was postponed till JIT implementation bench concluded its hearings.

Based on Judges comments in memory, the three implementation bench judges would have started preparing, deliberating and writing implementation bench recommendations immediately for the original five judges bench.

After the recommendations are prepared, the five member bench shall deliberate on those recommendations and write the final judgment.

The two earlier dissenting judges may well stick with their earlier judgements and may or may not add further (along those lines) their own findings based on implementation bench judges recommendations. I think at least Justice Khosa will add further if not both.

The three JIT judges obviously would have arrived at their findings too.

The judges may concur/ oppose according to their findings and arrive at a unanimous or majority verdict.

Justice Khosa and or other justices shall then write their findings/notes in the concluding judgement like in the interim order and Justice Khosa shall announce the final verdict.

It's just a not too wild guess based on how the media reported about the earlier interim order, I may be totally wrong but to me it appears to be a time consuming endeavour in itself.

May be if there is broad based consensus, I wish, we may yet get a verdict sooner rather than later.

I still think that it will be atleast 4-1 in favour of DQ if not unanimous, in sha Allah, and onwards to trial courts, NAB and EC according to criminal court or institutional proceedings requirements.

 

[Farah Sohail]

they need 1 vote and its going to be justice ahsen to make it 3/2 verdict to disqualify NS and his family + trial court proceedings.

Yes.... You are right.,we need one more vote for disqualification...and Justice Ijazul Ahsan will disqualify him, InshaAllah.. We wanted to know, many more things have come in JIT..and whether Justice Khosa and Gulzar can add to their previous verdict , based on JIT report, relating to criminal cases, and pergury...or not?

 

[Shane]

View attachment 413745

Pani maen madhani.

Bhai samjha karo channels ko bhe apna manjan baichna hota hay...

So what if a lunatic is preparing such a petition to revive PML-Q

Breaking news for ratings. Something sensational for anchors to talk for 45 minutes.

This SC will throw it in the dust bin.

 

[Yeah Me]

Pani maen madhani.

Bhai samjha karo channels ko bhe apna manjan baichna hota hay...

So what if a lunatic is preparing such a petition to revive PML-Q

Breaking news for ratings. Something sensational for anchors to talk for 45 minutes.

This SC will throw it in the dust bin.

This theory is not new. Discussed many time in print media also.
IK in his recent interview indicated for presidential form of Govt also
Let's c what will happen in future

 

[El Sidd]

This theory is not new. Discussed many time in print media also.
IK in his recent interview indicated for presidential form of Govt also
Let's c what will happen in future

Its not a plan. Its last attempt to save country from civil war and invasion.

So start treating this as the only plan.

Damage control is modus operandi at this moment.

 

[Realistic Change]

Panama case Decision will be announced till week end
Also media reporting for Qoumi Hakoomat

Media got wind of Qoumi Hakoomat possibility too - it's due to severe rift in PMLN - our members have already discussed this within PDF yesterday @Arsalan remember!

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/will...r-resign-from-post.508077/page-4#post-9698440

No one gives two and half days notice of press conference, and if it's done that way; obviously it means that it was for bargaining.

Yep and two leased candidates from smaller provinces as well. As they are safest for interim setup.

Just enjoy and see who leaves PMLN and who joins their nemesis

Yes.... You are right.,we need one more vote for disqualification...and Justice Ijazul Ahsan will disqualify him, InshaAllah.. We wanted to know, many more things have come in JIT..and whether Justice Khosa and Gulzar can add to their previous verdict , based on JIT report, relating to criminal cases, and pergury...or not?

Yep - every independent individual is eluding to this; but some pro status quo desperately trying to weave something to give "sab acha hai" report to head ogre!

 

[expert]

Like you say, It has become clear in recent days that the original 5 member bench had given an interim order and the actual judgement was postponed till JIT implementation bench concluded its hearings.

Based on Judges comments in memory, the three implementation bench judges would have started preparing, deliberating and writing implementation bench recommendations immediately for the original five judges bench.

After the recommendations are prepared, the five member bench shall deliberate on those recommendations and write the final judgment.

The two earlier dissenting judges may well stick with their earlier judgements and may or may not add further (along those lines) their own findings based on implementation bench judges recommendations. I think at least Justice Khosa will add further if not both.

The three JIT judges obviously would have arrived at their findings too.

The judges may concur/ oppose according to their findings and arrive at a unanimous or majority verdict.

Justice Khosa and or other justices shall then write their findings/notes in the concluding judgement like in the interim order and Justice Khosa shall announce the final verdict.

It's just a not too wild guess based on how the media reported about the earlier interim order, I may be totally wrong but to me it appears to be a time consuming endeavour in itself.

May be if there is broad based consensus, I wish, we may yet get a verdict sooner rather than later.

I still think that it will be atleast 4-1 in favour of DQ if not unanimous, in sha Allah, and onwards to trial courts, NAB and EC according to criminal court or institutional proceedings requirements.

Do you have any source to back your claim that the final judgment will be made by a 5-member bench apart from Arif Hameed & Sabir Shakir? They've spread too much fake and sensational news over the years to be credible. The PML guys are saying the final judgment will be made by the three-judge special bench.

 

[Dastaan]

https://twitter.com/x/status/889523090270679041

 

[Realistic Change]

Is our PM dual passport holder. Hasn't he surrendered his regular passport or Foreign Office refused to issue him Diplomatic Passport

Irony not, frauds are unmistakeable

 

[El_Swordsmen]

Do you have any source to back your claim that the final judgment will be made by a 5-member bench apart from Arif Hameed & Sabir Shakir? They've spread too much fake and sensational news over the years to be credible. The PML guys are saying the final judgment will be made by the three-judge special bench.

here goes the credibility down the drain .....
---------------------------------------------------
JIT exposing Maryam Nawaz

https://www.facebook.com/

 

[PakPak]

Is our PM dual passport holder. Hasn't he surrendered his regular passport or Foreign Office refused to issue him Diplomatic Passport

Irony not, frauds are unmistakeable



View attachment 413761 View attachment 413762

I wondered this too....he's a PM there is no reason why he wouldn't have a diplomatic passport.

Every single document these idiots have submitted either is fake or is full of little frauds. They can't even cheat properly. You couldn't make this up, unreal.

 

[PakSword]

https://twitter.com/x/status/889523090270679041

CJ's next question:

"We want to know from where did Sussex County get this money to pay Imran Khan. Imran was not a National Leader, but was a National Hero at that time. He must provide money trail and source of income of his employers as well. Otherwise, we may pass strict orders against him to make him an example for everyone."

While Justice Ejaz ul Ahsan asking Kh. Haris:

"Please dedo money trail. Kuchh tou dedo.. Acha aik kaam karo, Qatari ko hi bulwalo.. koi tou reason dedo hamain.. hum sab kuchh maannay ke liey tayaar hain"

 

[PakPak]

CJ's next question:

"We want to know from where did Sussex County get this money to pay Imran Khan. Imran was not a National Leader, but was a National Hero at that time. He must provide money trail and source of income of his employers as well. Otherwise, we may pass strict orders against him to make him an example for everyone."

While Justice Ejaz ul Ahsan asking Kh. Haris:

"Please dedo money trail. Kuchh tou dedo.. Acha aik kaam karo, Qatari ko hi bulwalo.. koi tou reason dedo hamain.. hum sab kuchh maannay ke liey tayaar hain"

How SC is wasting their time with Imran is criminal in itself, valuable taxpayer paisa on something utterly BS.

 

[Farah Sohail]

CJ's next question:

"We want to know from where did Sussex County get this money to pay Imran Khan. Imran was not a National Leader, but was a National Hero at that time. He must provide money trail and source of income of his employers as well. Otherwise, we may pass strict orders against him to make him an example for everyone."

While Justice Ejaz ul Ahsan asking Kh. Haris:

"Please dedo money trail. Kuchh tou dedo.. Acha aik kaam karo, Qatari ko hi bulwalo.. koi tou reason dedo hamain.. hum sab kuchh maannay ke liey tayaar hain"

@bold .. Mujhe tu CJ se ek aur darr hai.. Last time he said ke hum next week tak docs accept karein ge sirf....ab woh ye na keh dein ke aap aaj kiun submit karaa rahay hain? Aaj subah tu hum koi docs accept nahi karein ge.. Aap ko monday tak karaa denaychahye thay.. Tme out hogaya.. Jab ke panama case main JIT report ke baad bhi docs accept horahay thay.. Mujhe waqayi ye dar hai ke ye latest docs CJ accept karnay se inkaar na kardein

Aap shayad advocate ke baaray main keh rahay thay... aap ne Justice IjazulAhsan likh diya.. Advocate ko koi bahaana chahye...NS ko bachaanay ka....Justice Ijazul Ahsan ne tu kabhi qatari ko lift nahi karayi,, he almost rejected it last time too.. Infact Justice Khosa ki tarah qatari ki kuch tareefein bhi ki theen, unhon ne apnay verdict main..

I still think that it will be atleast 4-1 in favour of DQ if not unanimous, in sha Allah, and onwards to trial courts, NAB and EC according to criminal court or institutional proceedings requirements.

Those of you who are saying 4-1 disqualification..which judge are u excluding? Sheikh Azmat or Ejaz Afzal ?