What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Zafar hijazi has been arrested on record tempering but why did judges skip Maryam Nawaz?
Law should be equal for all

Is judges being smart to save Maryam Nawaz maybe?
 
.
PakSword said:
Haan I heard him. Lawyer community is still divided.

Kaheen yehi phaddon ki wajah na ban jaey..
Click to expand...

But mostly ppl believe ..it will be ..by 5 member bench..

Lekin phir bhi confusion tu hai.. Aur judges hain ke ye suspense khatam nahi kar ke de rahay
 
.
AUz said:
I am hearing that Shahbaaz (he's more clever than dumb Nawazu) has made a plan to directly make judges controversial---by doing something along the lines of submitting a huge amount of cash to judges' family members account and then 'exposing' the transaction as bribe etc (all before the judges or their families could even realize what happened).

Shareefs have their trusted partners/moles in banking institutions and all others.

So SC has to move quickly and decisively.

Allah khair karay
Click to expand...
In that case ,,, the one who is depositing movey will also be gone for long time in jail and no big business man is going to do this and no small business man will be able to justify how he arranged for this money ,,, it will be again another forged document issue ...
 
.
Strike X said:
Zafar hijazi has been arrested on record tempering but why did judges skip Maryam Nawaz? It should be equal.

Is judges being smart to save Maryam Nawaz maybe?
Click to expand...

I don't think they are saving her. She is not a public office holder (not officially at least).
Jahazi on the other hand is or was and was caught by FIA also.

She will face the cases after SC refers those against her in trial courts.
 
. .
Farah Sohail said:
But mostly ppl believe ..it will be ..by 5 member bench..

Lekin phir bhi confusion tu hai.. Aur judges hain ke ye suspense khatam nahi kar ke de rahay
Click to expand...

Judges ko khud bhi pata nahi ho ga :undecided:

On a serious note.... judges ko at least ye to aj clear kr hi dena chahiay tha k agy kesy chaly ga.
Ye hi kaha h inhon ne k faisla mehfooz kr lia h. ye bhi bata dety k sunaty waqt ye 3 judges hon gy ya full bench.
 
.
Farah Sohail said:
But mostly ppl believe ..it will be ..by 5 member bench..

Lekin phir bhi confusion tu hai.. Aur judges hain ke ye suspense khatam nahi kar ke de rahay
Click to expand...

it would've been referred to 5 member if that was the case ..... but Judges didn't said anything regarding that .... lagta aisay hi hai yehi 3 member bench karega faisla !!
 
Last edited:
.
Farah Sohail said:
Oho.. We dont say pakora to demean him... We say it in lighter note... Because of his own remark.. When hearing of panama case started..and hamid khan was PTI's lawyer...hamid khan referred to panama disclosure ke ye hai ye hai..and newspaper stories.. Tu inhon ne pehle din hamid khan se kaha tha ke hamid khan..akhbari khabron par tu aglay din pakora khaaye jaatay hain.. Tu hum ne unka woh comment pakar liya.. Is reference se hum unhein pakora kehtay hain..
Click to expand...

I knew the reason dear sis, I did say a bit demeaning. Thank you for explaining for the unawares again.
 
.
Salman Akram Raja said that regarding Prime Minister having another job/post there isn't any clear legislation, so it's an uncharted territory and most likely Supreme Court will decide regarding this issue.
 
. . . .
. . .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

GlobalVillageSpace
Panama Case: should Supreme Court render the final judgement?
Replies
0
Views
569
GlobalVillageSpace
GlobalVillageSpace
PakSword
Panamagate case: London flats were bought through Qatari investments, Sharif family tells SC
5 6 7 8 9 10
Replies
136
Views
10K
The Eagle
The Eagle

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Military Forum Latest Posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom