What's new

Panama Case - Post Verdict Discussion and Updates

My Leader......Nawaz Sharif!!

Who has looted my country and amassed his wealth abroad for decades and has drowned my country in unprecedented foreign debt, doubling it in 5 years what was borrowed during entire 70 years history. That's worthy leadership indeed:smitten:
 
@WebMaster
@Horus

PDF Associates tweet fetching great response....over 1100 replies:tup:

Proves Haram khoron aur unn Kay supporters ki kami nahee hay Pakistan maen, fruits of decades of "khata hay tu lagata bhee hay" haram khori :lol:.

@Tameem Some thing to ponder for the average Noon leagui doing point scoring and politics on their own loss like Tammo Rani:



Noon leaguis with halal ki kamai must concentrate on doing as much Sadqa as possible instead of politics to help out their leadership's troubled times and unavailability of such pure finances required for a pious cause...
 
Proves Haram khoron aur unn Kay supporters ki kami nahee hay Pakistan maen, fruits of decades of "khata hay tu lagata bhee hay" haram khori :lol:.

@Tameem Some thing to ponder for the average Noon leagui doing point scoring and politics on their own loss like Tammo Rani:



Noon leaguis with halal ki kamai must concentrate on doing as much Sadqa as possible instead of politics to help out their leadership's troubled times and unavailability of such pure finances required for a pious cause...
Sir why are you demanding something that does not exist , halal ki kamaai...
 

:argh: Tammo Rani and Haram Khor Media Back to repeating the same Rant as broken old Records lol :rofl:

Well then, answer the same old facts:

Why fake documents ? why false Qatri letters? why no money trail? why Hasan and Hussain absconded? Why Maryam forged ownership papers and forged trustee documents?

NAB LAW is clear as daylight but Media agrees with Sharifs that it is night :lol:.

The case conviction for both baap baiti is clearly "Not providing money trail of admitted assets, having baynamidar property, and aiding and abetting to conceal it" in accordance with NAB law as described in NAB Ordinance 1999.

Sharifs were convicted under Section 9 (a) in general and (v) and (xii) of the NAO 1999 and for the offence at Serial No.2 of the Schedule to the NAO 1999, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 10 and 7 years with fine of millions of pounds under Section 10 of the NAO 1999 for the offence under Section 9 (a)(v) and (xii) ibid, and to one year simple imprisonment for offence at Serial No.2 of the schedule to the NAO 1999, with stipulation that both sentences shall run concurrently.

NAO 1999 "9A - (V)" and "9 A-(xii) STATES:

9 (A) A holder of a public office, or any other person, is said to commit or to have committed the offence of corruption and corrupt practices-

(v) if he or any of his dependents or benamidar owns, possesses, or has 4[acquired] right or title in any 5[“assets or holds irrevocable power of attorney in respect of any assets] or

(xii) if he aids, assists, abets, attempts or acts in conspiracy with a person or a holder of public office accused of an offence as provided in clauses (i) to (xi).]; and

Screenshot_2018-08-15-13-50-09_1.jpg
 
:argh: Tammo Rani and Haram Khor Media Back to repeating the same Rant as broken old Records lol :rofl:

Well then, answer the same old facts:

Why fake documents ? why false Qatri letters? why no money trail? why Hasan and Hussain absconded? Why Maryam forged ownership papers and forged trustee documents?

NAB LAW is clear as daylight but Media agrees with Sharifs that it is night :lol:.

The case conviction for both baap baiti is clearly "Not providing money trail of admitted assets, having baynamidar property, and aiding and abetting to conceal it" in accordance with NAB law as described in NAB Ordinance 1999.

Sharifs were convicted under Section 9 (a) in general and (v) and (xii) of the NAO 1999 and for the offence at Serial No.2 of the Schedule to the NAO 1999, and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 10 and 7 years with fine of millions of pounds under Section 10 of the NAO 1999 for the offence under Section 9 (a)(v) and (xii) ibid, and to one year simple imprisonment for offence at Serial No.2 of the schedule to the NAO 1999, with stipulation that both sentences shall run concurrently.

NAO 1999 "9A - (V)" and "9 A-(xii) STATES:

9 (A) A holder of a public office, or any other person, is said to commit or to have committed the offence of corruption and corrupt practices-

(v) if he or any of his dependents or benamidar owns, possesses, or has 4[acquired] right or title in any 5[“assets or holds irrevocable power of attorney in respect of any assets] or

(xii) if he aids, assists, abets, attempts or acts in conspiracy with a person or a holder of public office accused of an offence as provided in clauses (i) to (xi).]; and

View attachment 498562

Brother what is going inside the IHC, it seems they want to free this cursed rotten family, there was a ticker that was shown on ARY that SC is displeased with the IHC judge remarks against NAB.
 
Brother what is going inside the IHC, it seems they want to free this cursed rotten family, there was a ticker that was shown on ARY that SC is displeased with the IHC judge remarks against NAB.

Media is only making a mountain out of a molehill. It's standard practice of Geo and like minded media to spread sensational planted news as breaking and the rest simply follow it.

They don't want to be left behind in Ratings. It has happened so many times now, since Panama leaks started 3 years ago... that it is not even an anomaly but for the dheet media it's business as usual.

Judges ask tough questions to find any gaps in verdicts but that does not mean that Judges can change the law i.e. The NAB LAW is clear about baynamidar property.

Nawaz was convicted and punished for having baynamidar property in kids name. He and kids failed to provide money trail of properties they still use shamelessly in London since the 90s...

Maryam submitted forged ownership documents to aid and abet her father. Period.

Not having assets value assessed does not mean that the lavish property does not exist or was not kept baynamidar in children's name by the Public office holder father who himself admitted property ownership and promised to provide money trail as well along with absconded son Hussain.

I am still hopeful that Justice AtherminAllah's bench will not suspend the punishment of Nawaz Sharif while Maryam's case is not just aiding and abetting but also committing forgery.
 
I am still hopeful that Justice AtherminAllah's bench will not suspend the punishment of Nawaz Sharif while Maryam's case is not just aiding and abetting but also committing forgery.

I’m basing this opinion on Indian judicial pronouncements, should be similar in Pakistan too.

Regardless of verdict by a lower court and whatever its merits, appellate courts usual grant bail when appeal is under consideration. The logic is that if the court overturns the verdict, then the persons concerned are punished needlessly. I’m aware that there is more here than just a normal court case but I would think that the judges are likely to allow for bail.
 
I’m basing this opinion on Indian judicial pronouncements, should be similar in Pakistan too.

Regardless of verdict by a lower court and whatever its merits, appellate courts usual grant bail when appeal is under consideration. The logic is that if the court overturns the verdict, then the persons concerned are punished needlessly. I’m aware that there is more here than just a normal court case but I would think that the judges are likely to allow for bail.
You are right about similarities due to our common colonial legacy but only for lessor jail terms than 4 years.

Appeal Courts in Pakistan hardly ever or rarely allow bail in cases where 10 years and 7 years of jail terms have been handed out.
 

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom