Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Though the source is least credible still
My personal assessment is that we will go for the Bren. It can be easily incorporated into the army, are cheaper, have better specs, use the same caliber, and the ToT will not be an issue, in fact as an MoU has already been signed bw pof and CZ according to which we will slowly shift from light assembly to complete production of the weapon. Most importantly it looks good which the people usually want and the army too as it would give a modern touch. A beautiful rifle might prove to be a poor man's SCAR
Well this may interest you, though no credence to the claim **yet**
This is exactly what is his claim based onWell this may interest you, though no credence to the claim **yet**
Guy is biggest fake new peddler don't take him seriously
His news is based on the deal we signed with Czech Republic two days ago. Check the above posts you would see the deal.Guy is biggest fake new peddler don't take him seriously
He is just guessing nothing moreHis news is based on the deal we signed with Czech Republic two days ago. Check the above posts you would see the deal.
New Recruit
To be completely honest, the decision we needed was already made, the people in this thread are waiting for the wrong thing. I’m not sure how no one else has noticed such an obvious thing.504 pages later, has the decision been made? Or should I return after another 500 pages?
For reference sake, the decision to go with G-3 was made in ~1963. That should give an indication about the time and pace of funding with which the army moves to replace its existing stocks of battle rifles.