I actually disagree
@Bilal Khan (Quwa).
By 2030 Blue water Surface Action task forces will likely be comprised of
1x Jinnah class
1xTughril
1x Babar
1X SSK
It makes sense that the Jinnahs will concentrate more on surface warfare while the other two do coordinate air and subsurface. Data links will allow the Group to coordinate ane expand its AD bubble beyond just what a single warship would have.
(I think Zulfqars will lead coastal task forces).
tbh all 3 ship types are multi-mission by design, so they're all equipped for AAW, AShW and ASW.
But the B-Class and J-Class have a better anti-air warfare (AAW) capability. The B-Class/J-Class aren't bottlenecked by the need to rely on illuminator radars, so they can launch SAMs in larger salvos. In all likelihood, the B-Class and J-Class will be protecting the task force from most aerial threats, especially low-fliers and missiles. The T-Class would likely focus on engaging aircraft. Yes, the T-Class is carrying more SAMs by capacity, but from a real-time employment standpoint, it can't launch as many at one time as the B-Class or J-Class. This would change if the PN swap the SARH LY-80s with an ARH-based SAM similar to CAMM-ER.
As for surface-to-surface capability, all 3 are very close. The T-Class is equipped with the supersonic-cruising element (CM-302), while the B-Class will likely either have the sub-sonic dual-LACM/ASCM (Harbah) or P282. The J-Class is unclear, the brochure states P282, but the model shows a 2x4 config for Harpoon/C-802A-type sub-sonic ASCM. Moreover, we don't have a clear idea of what P282 is... It's a hypersonic ballistic missile, but how that looks from a capacity standpoint is unknown. That said, each of the T-Class, B-Class, and J-Class are employing a unique surface-to-surface capability.
If anything, the 3 ship types are really similar in overall capability to each other, except they're all different. So, the PN is basically banking on diversity within the task force. It makes dealing with that force a bit more difficult because you have different SAMs in play, different SSM capabilities, different radars and ESM, and so on. There's a scenario in the future where all 3 could have a long-range SAM.