Pakistan's Missile Test For MIRV Capability !

[White and Green with M/S]

Yeah, I don't work for Pakistan nuclear forces. If I did, I would be under oath for not discussing such things
Btw if you can't see the difference, i am surprised.
Each to their own . Not here to impress you
You asked for the basis of my assumptions, and I gave you a reply.

However many others observed the same and wrote in news articles .
No point in me making the effort of finding links . If you want , help yourself.

You're speculating there ababeel warheads tested on Shaheen 1A , ababeel has a babbles warhead casing did you see that on Shaheen 1A picture you posted

 

[NooriNuth]

You're speculating there ababeel warheads tested on Shaheen 1A , ababeel has a babbles warhead casing did you see that on Shaheen 1A picture you posted

Babies warhead?

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Babies warhead?

Fat warheads like ababeel have Shaheen 1A didn't have this type of warheads casings to fit MIRV inside its nose

 

[NooriNuth]

Fat warheads like ababeel have Shaheen 1A didn't have this type of warheads casings to fit MIRV inside its nose

You need to look closely
Shaheen 3 has a third stage tucked in the nose cone. Above the short third stage, you can see the same warhead as Shaheen 1A experimental version.
I suggest look again and concentrate.

 

[Windjammer]

Fat warheads like ababeel have Shaheen 1A didn't have this type of warheads casings to fit MIRV inside its nose

Dude try to understand what @NooriNuth is saying.
While Ababeel has multiple warheads in its nose casing, the Shaheen -1A was tested incorporating one of those warheads.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

You need to look closely
Shaheen 3 has a third stage tucked in the nose cone. Above the short third stage, you can see the same warhead as Shaheen 1A experimental version.
I suggest look again and concentrate.

Do know what's the MIRV stand for? Shaheen 1A has only a single warhead design

Dude try to understand what @NooriNuth is saying.
While Ababeel has multiple warheads in its nose casing, the Shaheen -1A was tested incorporating one of those warheads.

How and what was the purpose of fitting ababeel single warhead on Shaheen 1A?

 

[NooriNuth]

Do know what's the MIRV stand for? Shaheen 1A has only a single warhead design


How and what was the purpose of fitting ababeel single warhead on Shaheen 1A?

Nope I don't know what's an MIRV. Is it a fish ?

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Nope I don't know what's an MIRV. Is it a fish ?

Stop trolling I'm serious

 

[NooriNuth]

Stop trolling I'm serious

If were serious, you won't jump from one line of discussion to another.
You asked me about Shaheen 3 warhead. I replied. Without discussing that, you jumping to Ababeel
If that's seriousness, I don't know what's the definition of messing around and wasting time.
Also while I am posting pictures, comparisons and links to news reports, you are making blatant condescending statements.
Such as "Do you know what's MIRV'"
تمہاری کیا ایم آئی آر وی کی دوکان ہے کیماڑی میں ؟

 

[White and Green with M/S]

If were serious, you won't jump from one line of discussion to another.
You asked me about Shaheen 3 warhead. I replied. Without discussing that, you jumping to Ababeel
If that's seriousness, I don't know what's the definition of messing around and wasting time.

OK I'm sorry let agree to disagree

 

[Windjammer]

How and what was the purpose of fitting ababeel single warhead on Shaheen 1A?

Let's just say, same purpose that an F-16s radar was incorporated and tested on a civilian jet.

 

[NooriNuth]

Dude try to understand what @NooriNuth is saying.
While Ababeel has multiple warheads in its nose casing, the Shaheen -1A was tested incorporating one of those warheads.

Thanks windy بھائی ۔
Finally someone understands.
The thing about nuclear missiles is that the missile itself may cost a few millions dollar a piece, the warhead costs way way more, in the realms of 100+ million USD a piece for strategic yield warhead.
You don't build a new design for every missile, you build a missile around the warhead.
Way more cost effective and sensible.
It's due to the R&D costs, cost of extreme precision engineering requirements. Bespoke tools, programming. Also amount of plutonium required to keep the weights and size down to mountable in multiple, is one of the most expensive component.
For example you see this trend on American missiles. The same warhead used single on Minuteman was MIRVd on Peacekeeper.
Pakistan is no different. In fact we have far less money and resources. So it's logical to see the same warhead design on a single warhead missile such as Shaheen 3 and then the same used multiple as MIRV' on Ababeel.

 

[Muji.Iqbal]

Why we need to test an icbm our enemies are in our missiles range no need to have a icbm

Well there needs to be a Muslim country which has that capability so Pakistan should test and ICBM.

 

[NooriNuth]

Well there needs to be a Muslim country which has that capability so Pakistan should test and ICBM.

Capability is there. The geopolitical need or political will to do so, isn't.

 

[White and Green with M/S]

Well there needs to be a Muslim country which has that capability so Pakistan should test and ICBM.

Why to threaten USA?