Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My looking in a mirror doesn't solve the way you look, does it? Shouldn't you have your own reasons for straightening up?
The ISI fears there are hundreds of CIA contracted spies operating in Pakistan without the knowledge of either the Pakistan government or the intelligence agency
Then why do Pakistani diplomats go out of their way to ask us?
Who is the know-it-all now? And why?
With the decay in rule-of-law demonstrated by terror-paralyzed officials, undoubtedly it is PAKISTAN which is falling from civilization into barbarism. How can you think that it is the U.S.? Psychologists call this displacement.
This was not a rhetorical question, as to me this is fact. I was asking for my own edification. If you have nothing to contribute, isn't the proper thing to do to say so plainly, rather than accuse me of delusions?Nobody does, Its your delusional mind that is working overtime.
These are not answers.Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq to name just few.
Anybody can call anybody anything. One has to discern the difference between what things are and what they are called. If you can't attempt to do that, how can you claim to be sane?With the ethical and moral bankruptcy demonstrated by your President -
Oh, I get it. You have trouble dealing with the idea that the CIA is a law-abiding (at least by U.S. law) organization that is accountable to democratic superiors, rather than the plot-behind-the-scenes-for-evil organization you learn about in Pakistan's media.Sorry but i cant buy what you are selling .Working of CIA is like totall pure , it cant be and could never be. Does your blind hypocrycy in support of the wrong doings never cease to stop.None of the americans i come by are that much hardcore.CIA has been conducting black ops and the whole top slot in the intel comette either knows all about it or dosent...
Anybody can call anybody anything. One has to discern the difference between what things are and what they are called. If you can't attempt to do that, how can you claim to be sane?
Uh-uh. The argument about diplomatic immunity isn't about guilt or innocence, but about criminal jurisdiction. Most diplomats who commit offenses get off scot-free because the host country doesn't invest the human and material resources to bring a case to trial in the diplomat's home country. You tell me how likely it is that the GoP, in the face of public pressure, will simply forget about the whole thing rather than pursue Davis in U.S. courts?Your president and FO are trying their arses out to make a criminal look an innocent. What does that makes them?
"Murder" is something premeditated and no one thinks that was the case here. Yet in many ways I wonder more about this guy than I do about Davis. Had GoP officials stuck to their lawful duty of yielding Davis to U.S. custody would American officials have been more forthcoming about releasing details about this driver? Remember, the driver only flew the coop after weeks of blatant Pakistani government violations of the laws and procedures concerning diplomats. One always has to expect tit-for-tat retaliation in circumstances like this. Now no case against the driver seems possible. That's part of what Pakistan surrendered by insisting, in violation of domestic and international law, that it hold on to Davis.Also not to forget that murderer driver of your embassy that has already flown away to US.
Uh-uh. The argument about diplomatic immunity isn't about guilt or innocence, but about criminal jurisdiction. Most diplomats who commit offenses get off scot-free because the host country doesn't invest the human and material resources to bring a case to trial in the diplomat's home country. You tell me how likely it is that the GoP, in the face of public pressure, will simply forget about the whole thing rather than pursue Davis in U.S. courts?
"Murder" is something premeditated and no one thinks that was the case here. Yet in many ways I wonder more about this guy than I do about Davis. Had GoP officials stuck to their lawful duty of yielding Davis to U.S. custody would American officials have been more forthcoming about releasing details about this driver? Remember, the driver only flew the coop after weeks of blatant Pakistani government violations of the laws and procedures concerning diplomats. One always has to expect tit-for-tat retaliation in circumstances like this. Now no case against the driver seems possible. That's part of what Pakistan surrendered by insisting, in violation of domestic and international law, that it hold on to Davis.
It appears the Pakistanis here have nothing to say on the matter.