Tactical Nuclear Shellsir whts the utility of m110 in modern times which we are holding on to
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tactical Nuclear Shellsir whts the utility of m110 in modern times which we are holding on to
isn’t we operate nasr for thatTactical Nuclear Shell
True, I personally am not of the opinion, that it fits into our nuclear doctrine any more. Maybe as a last line of defence.isn’t we operate nasr for that
sir whts the utility of m110 in modern times which we are holding on to
It packs a big enough punch... Primary role being counter bombardment and neutralizing enemy gun positions along with interdiction and harassing fire.sir whts the utility of m110 in modern times which we are holding on to
Hitting something with a 155mm projectile and hitting something with a 203mm projectile has some differences. It’s not the most modern system anymore but it doesn’t hurt to have a few of them for special purposes.sir whts the utility of m110 in modern times which we are holding on to
we do not use those. It has a 18-23 kilometer range…30 with rocket projectiles.Tactical Nuclear Shell
after reading this comment i went into searchHitting something with a 155mm projectile and hitting something with a 203mm projectile has some differences. It’s not the most modern system anymore but it doesn’t hurt to have a few of them for special purposes.
we do not use those. It has a 18-23 kilometer range…30 with rocket projectiles.
Not any more, but before NASR a nuclear shell was developedHitting something with a 155mm projectile and hitting something with a 203mm projectile has some differences. It’s not the most modern system anymore but it doesn’t hurt to have a few of them for special purposes.
we do not use those. It has a 18-23 kilometer range…30 with rocket projectiles.
Of course.after reading this comment i went into search
found a old clip about artillery regiments of pakistan army
some major was saying 203 mm direct hit on a tank can destroy even the best armor is it true?
When one sees it firing from close up, only then can he realize the destruction it causes. However its rate of fire and large crew is bit if an issue.sir whts the utility of m110 in modern times which we are holding on to
He’s correct, the speed and the mass of a 203mm projectile fired directly at a tank will tear stuff to pieces just due to the sheer explosive force (these are explosive HE projectiles, artillery guns like this don’t carry AP)after reading this comment i went into search
found a old clip about artillery regiments of pakistan army
some major was saying 203 mm direct hit on a tank can destroy even the best armor is it true?
Pakistani artillery especially and they are fond of it as well.Artillery crews are trained for direct-fire situations too
Artillery shells especially of such a large caliber can achieve a mobility kill or can destroy the main gun (Firepower kill)armor itself, it’s meant to do area damage and not penetrating damage.
this is based on an actual incident, when a sherman was "bodily lifted" due to an 8 inch shell falling close to its tracks, during battle of zafarwal in 1965. tank belonged to 2 Lancer of indian army. its unlikely tht any tank other thn sherman (heavier and modern) will recieve the same treatment. but without a doubt a direct hit from 93 kg shell on any tank will knock it out of action.I've heard that if it hits near the tank, it can cause it to topple(though I doubt a modern one).
Our artillery outclassed anything that India could present especially due to these guns. They felt hopeless against them and that's why artillery earned the greatest amount of respect both by friend and foe in 65.8 inch shell
However it will decimate the bmp2s which AFAIK are lighter than Shermans.but without a doubt a direct hit from 93 kg shell on any tank will knock it out of action
pure aggressionHowever it will decimate the bmp2s which AFAIK are lighter than Shermans.