Mav3rick
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2008
- Messages
- 6,946
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
1. Feel good stories, anonymous sources are one sided always. If I saw a flaw in such claims, should I wholeheartedly accept it given PAF has track record of lying? and how come it becomes a motive or an agenda? Thinking of feel good stories, JF-17 crash was declared a bird strike by anonymous sources. We know how it turned out later
2. Where did I say or gives a hint that PAF do daily public press releases? "Sawal Chana Jawab Gandum". Our whole argument about is about the claim anon sources made and how it is incompatible in future warfare but you are making irrelevant assumptions.
3. Was Erieye a state secret that it needs to be coverup?? No, but PAF did it why? To hide it.
Now I think we are moving in circles. I rest my case.
Don't you think some disclosures, or lack thereof, are strategic? I quite literally fail to understand the benefit that you, I or the next common man would have gained with that particular knowledge. On the other hand, such knowledge just may be a gold chest to the neighbours.