T90TankGuy
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2010
- Messages
- 9,427
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Where do you get the figure of 32 reactors? and 40Kmw? unrealistic !!!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ISLAMABAD: Pakistan is in the process of selecting eight sites for the installation of 32 nuclear power plants, which will generate a total of 40,000 MW electricity, said Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PAEC) chairman Dr Ansar Parvez. He did not specify a time frame.
Is this really goona happen...? In this decade..! Don't think so..
Which reactors do the current plants use? (The ones for electricity generation, I mean.)
Designed by who, which company or country? Do you know the model name?Gen2 with Gen3 ones under construction at Karachi.
Designed by who, which company or country? Do you know the model name?
One of the big problems with nuclear power is the enormous upfront cost. These reactors are extremely expensive to build. While the returns may be very great, they're also very slow. It can sometimes take decades to recoup initial costs.I must say that nuclear energy is not only clean, but it is also safe, reliable, durable and competitive. Nuclear Energy is a compact, reliable sustainable energy source that reduces carbon emissions and increases energy security. So Yes Nuclear Energy is the solution to energy crisis of Pakistan and this can only be possible by having more nuclear power plants.
Well I guarantee this isn't gonna happen within the next twenty years!!!!!
Reactors are fine.
Pakistan should also use tidal power, of which Pakistan has great potential for. Supplement this with solar, which again we have great potential and some wind power.
So its 4 NPPs per site?
Where are these billions of dollars coming in?
Do you know how much does it cost?
One of the big problems with nuclear power is the enormous upfront cost. These reactors are extremely expensive to build. While the returns may be very great, they're also very slow. It can sometimes take decades to recoup initial costs.
The cost of installing new nuclear capacity exceeds $6,000 per Kw in final cost at today's rates or $6 million per Mw.
Therefore, 40,000 Mw would mean capital investment of $240 billion over a period of say 10 years. That means $24 billion per year!! (Though I think this is a road-map till 2050. I'm not sure. Maybe someone can correct me here. Thanks! However, even $4 billion per year till 2050 is a pretty huge amount. And this doesn't include cost overruns and inflation).
Let's say China funds 50%, still $12 billion per year for 10 years is a pretty enormous amount. And China won't do it for free!! The costs of nuclear generation would have to be shared with them and so the cost you'd be paying per Kw would be probably much more than what you're paying now because you'd need to reimburse the Chinese too! Remember, there re no freebies. Everything comes at a a cost.
Sir we should be switching to Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors in the long term.
Business Day Live: Chinese plan to develop new reactors may benefit the world | Thorium Forum
$2-2.5 billion per plant.
it is one of the least expensive energy source.
Not sure.
China bought the Toshiba-Westinghouse design and plants for reported $3billion a pop.
China seen buying 8 Westinghouse reactors for $24 billion nuclear energy projects| Reuters
8 plants for $24 billion.
Please update your numbers.
Thank you
This thread is about Chinese version of the Westinghouse AP1000 Reactors
Thorium is long way off.
AP1000 copy is what Pakistan is buying from China.