What's new

Pakistanis condemning Pulwama terror strike on social media

But I will admit we have too many of these Liberals in Lahore. Could it be because of Lollywood?
I think the reason is we've a lot of Uni's in fact most of the top of the line uni's, schools and colleges are in Lahore and naturally that will attract elite to it. I mean Kinnaird, LSE, Beacon house etc they're known to be the epicenter of burgers/elite :P but that doesn't mean all of them products are like this some of them maybe are sensible too who knows.
 
.
I think the reason is we've a lot of Uni's in fact most of the top of the line uni's, schools and colleges are in Lahore and naturally that will attract elite to it. I mean Kinnaird, LSE, Beacon house etc they're known to be the epicenter of burgers/elite :P but that doesn't mean all of them products are like this some of them maybe are sensible too who knows.
Just a bunch of good for nothing humanities students dont give them importance :D
#StemMasterRace
@RealNapster
 
. .
They are always complaining about not getting jobs after doing masters
You moron Masters in frikin literature doesnot carry same market value as masters in mathematics or something :D
 
.
And Pakistan was in no position to do so given it was struggling to set up it's own government and institutions and support and care for millions of refugees pouring in from India. India's blockade of Junagadh was the causal factor, designed to force Pakistan's hand in this situation.
Rubbish. They could arm and send tribals into Kashmir but couldn't send a few boats with food and material. They couldn't have cared less for Junagadh.

We don't need to as Kashmir is still on the agenda of the UNSC (as an unresolved international dispute) and the UNSC Resolutions on Kashmir remain valid.

Nah. Completely different. You are questioning the accession to India. It would be quicker to get it resolved in Court if you had a case.

Yes, there are some ill-informed Pakistani people who have no clue about what's really going on in Occupied Kashmir. But we don't lynch people, or expel them from their homes/workplaces/educational institutions just for expressing their political views. Now compare it with the prevailing situation in India, the so-called world's largest democracy... 1.3 billion people, but no one can question the official/popular narrative, or express dissent, without risking one's life and limb.
Really? Cause in this very forum I've read about a Christian couple thrown in a brick kiln, a woman accused of blasphemy being acquitted leading to killing and riots, a young man lynched by his fellow students, minorities raped and kidnapped. All in Pak. Or maybe you live in an alternate Pakistan that's accessed via Alice's burrow.
 
.
Nah. Completely different. You are questioning the accession to India. It would be quicker to get it resolved in Court if you had a case.

It's not different.
The accession of Kashmir to Pakistan or India is yet to be decided as per the UN,
Why would we challenge something that's already 'not recognized'

Really? Cause in this very forum I've read about a Christian couple thrown in a brick kiln, a woman accused of blasphemy being acquitted leading to killing and riots, a young man lynched by his fellow students, minorities raped and kidnapped. All in Pak. Or maybe you live in an alternate Pakistan that's accessed via Alice's burrow.

Read my post again, carefully
 
.
Okay let me teach you some history.
During our freedom, all states were given choice of India, Pakistan, or freedom.
Both India and Pakistan (hypocritically) did not allow the thrid option.

Let me add some detail that might re-orient your views.

Mountbatten came with an additional mission over and above that of presiding over independence and partition. He came with a mission from the King-Emperor to explain to the princes what they might and might not do. Please check the records; EVERY prince who thought that he might like to be independent was told categorically and directly by Mountbatten that Britain WOULD NOT recognise the independence of any party other than within the ambit of the two Dominions. This was categorically stated to Hyderabad, for instance.The other principle that he shared, apparently not authored by HM, was that a state was free to join either Dominion, subject to contiguity. This had implications for Travancore, for Hyderabad, for Junagadh, for Jodhpur and for Kashmir (actually for another bizarre example, but let me confuse a few issues at a time). Travancore was told not to be silly and not try to be independent, Hyderabad was told that she could not be independent, Junagadh was pressurised after opting for Pakistan, on the contiguity account, Jodhpur was pressurised through the volatile personality of the ruler, and with @M. Sarmad around, nobody needs to be told about Kashmir.

Hydrabad exercised her rights and voted Paksitan. India then invaded, violating the agreement.

She didn't, actually; the closest that this got was the last-moment transfer of a large sum of money to a British bank, and then an instruction to send this to Pakistan - or rather, to transfer it to Pakistan's account in a British bank. This was blocked, and the case continues to this day. But Hyderabad never actually acceded to Pakistan. She seems to have wanted independence.

Kashmir wanted independence, but Pakistan made that claim that it was Muslim majority so it invaded.

Yes.

But India in its full retard mode got itself involed for no reason.
Now here we are 70 years later and you and you are making an innocent face and asking "What can India do, we are stuck "

No.

No one is sympathetic to India here, she made this mess only by herself and and she alone has the power to end it by a simple vote.

Of course, mentally ill hindutva won't allow people any true freedom so the killings and murders will continue.



1. No you are wrong.
And 2.
India promised Kashmir a vote as part of the treaty with the Maharaja.
This vote has nothing to do with Pakistan or the UN.
You are legally obligated to give a vote.

But again, we know that India really a Religious-Fascist state and not a true democracy.

Ho hum.
 
.
Rubbish. They could arm and send tribals into Kashmir but couldn't send a few boats with food and material. They couldn't have cared less for Junagadh.

Well, India took the Kashmir matter to the UN in 1948 and accused Pakistan of giving assistance to the invading forces, "including, but not limited to, the supply of arms and ammunition."

Pakistan, instead of answering the specific charges of aggression, filed countercharges against the government
of India under Article 35, charging it with the breach of international agreements, incitement of revolution, "numerous attacks on Pakistan territory," and an "extensive campaign of genocide. . . the object [of which] is the destruction of the state of Pakistan


Pakistani diplomats prevailed, Pakistan was not declared an Aggressor State in Kashmir by the UN and the "The Kashmir Question" was changed to "India-Pakistan Question" on Pakistan's request
 
.
Rubbish. They could arm and send tribals into Kashmir but couldn't send a few boats with food and material. They couldn't have cared less for Junagadh.
Completely true - with all the other challenges facing the newly independent State of Pakistan, carrying out a massive sea based operation to deliver supplies to millions in a State completely blockaded by India, with unrest and riots stoked by India was simply not feasible. It would have required not just food and resources (already in short supply given the millions of refugees pouring into Pakistan from India) but also significant logistical lines and security forces, to maintain law and order.

What India did in Junagadh was essentially East Pakistan 'lite' by India, and a clear statement of hostility towards a newly formed Pakistan, and a completely hypocritical approach towards partition (given India's stance on J&K).
 
.
Don't you get them in Karachi as well? I've seen dubious stuff from there. I guess it's a tiny minority in every metropolitan city, aside Peshawar :lol:, they're hardcore.
True brother, I'm just glad there's still patriotic Pakistanis left to defend the cause of Kashmir in the face of this propaganda onslaught by the enemies and traitors in our own rank. The Kashmiri cause is as old as our Pakistan and any Pakistani who reneges on Kashmir is betraying the wishe of the Quaid to free Kashmir and to allow it's people the right to determine their future.
 
.
Oh according to her more innocent than the Kashmiris! Two words for her and others f*ck off!



Don't you get them in Karachi as well? I've seen dubious stuff from there. I guess it's a tiny minority in every metropolitan city, aside Peshawar :lol:, they're hardcore.
She needs her head checked. Dis she forget abt her brethren blown up into a million small pieces, by theses same people? Disgusting
 
.
Pradesh, Punjab, haryana and Delhi dry, these states feed India, provide electricity to North India, it's too big a cost to be paid

All will become part of Pakistan when the only Hindu state will be wiped off the earth. These rivers will still provide for the residents of these areas, we will assure of that.
 
.
Pakistanis are sane and normal Humans. Of course we will condemn what is wrong.
Now, can you say the same for Indians?

Have not seen too many Indians condemn 2002 gencoide, Babri Mosque destruction, or the lynching of minorities.

We elect people who have brought prestige to our country and a world class humanitarian, while you elect butchers who were previously banned from flying to the US.

You do not hold much ground when you belong to a nation who has not seen a full fledge democracy, 36 years of Military rule since birth and numerous coups and assassination for power...
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom