What's new

Pakistanis condemning Pulwama terror strike on social media

Completely true - with all the other challenges facing the newly independent State of Pakistan, carrying out a massive sea based operation to deliver supplies to millions in a State completely blockaded by India, with unrest and riots stoked by India was simply not feasible. It would have required not just food and resources (already in short supply given the millions of refugees pouring into Pakistan from India) but also significant logistical lines and security forces, to maintain law and order.

What India did in Junagadh was essentially East Pakistan 'lite' by India, and a clear statement of hostility towards a newly formed Pakistan, and a completely hypocritical approach towards partition (given India's stance on J&K).
Millions? Massive sea operation?

Which junagadh is this?

The population of Junagadh and even its principilaties which had anyways seceded from Junagadh was less than a million.
 
You do not hold much ground when you belong to a nation who has not seen a full fledge democracy, 36 years of Military rule since birth and numerous coups and assassination for power...
retarded answer, but don't expect much fron Indians.

Who do you thik ended thouse dictatorships?
It was the people of Pakistan.
So again, we the people are Pakistan are infinatly better at being decent humans then Indians could ever hope for.

Not only do we condemn what is wrong, but we have also brought down dictatorships, multiple times.

Meanwhile Indian people can ony hunt and murder helpless minorities.
 
retarded answer, but don't expect much fron Indians.

Who do you thik ended thouse dictatorships?
It was the people of Pakistan.
So again, we the people are Pakistan are infinatly better at being decent humans then Indians could ever hope for.

Not only do we condemn what is wrong, but we have also brought down dictatorships, multiple times.

Meanwhile Indian people can ony hunt and murder helpless minorities.
Not to mention install dictatorships.
 
Let me add some detail that might re-orient your views.

Mountbatten came with an additional mission over and above that of presiding over independence and partition. He came with a mission from the King-Emperor to explain to the princes what they might and might not do. Please check the records; EVERY prince who thought that he might like to be independent was told categorically and directly by Mountbatten that Britain WOULD NOT recognise the independence of any party other than within the ambit of the two Dominions. This was categorically stated to Hyderabad, for instance.The other principle that he shared, apparently not authored by HM, was that a state was free to join either Dominion, subject to contiguity. This had implications for Travancore, for Hyderabad, for Junagadh, for Jodhpur and for Kashmir (actually for another bizarre example, but let me confuse a few issues at a time). Travancore was told not to be silly and not try to be independent, Hyderabad was told that she could not be independent, Junagadh was pressurised after opting for Pakistan, on the contiguity account, Jodhpur was pressurised through the volatile personality of the ruler, and with @M. Sarmad around, nobody needs to be told about Kashmir.



She didn't, actually; the closest that this got was the last-moment transfer of a large sum of money to a British bank, and then an instruction to send this to Pakistan - or rather, to transfer it to Pakistan's account in a British bank. This was blocked, and the case continues to this day. But Hyderabad never actually acceded to Pakistan. She seems to have wanted independence.



Yes.



No.



Ho hum.
Normally I repsect your views Joe, but you are clearly only espousing Indian view here. A view that we Pakistanis reject.

Please point out what is wrong. Don’t just make the statement, explain your POV. You yourself stated that Democracy allows people the freedom to choose sovereignty over land.
Which instances in history have there been where democratic countries have allowed people to vote sovereignty over land. Or where the definition of democracy is taken as such.
I am eagerly awaiting your response on the same.

Lastly, India is under no legal obligation to provide the people of Kashmir the vote for plebiscite. The U.N. resolutions are non binding. Please provide evidence for this statement.
India did not cut any deal with the MAharaja as part of the instrument of accession of Kashmir. You’re absolutely wrong on both these counts.
But I’ll let some other members here from both sides come in to get their opinion on the same.

@AgNoStiC MuSliM, @Joe Shearer care to weigh in on this matter?

I have already given my evidence, you ignored it, so I don't need to re-sate it.
Countries that have democratically seperated: South Sudan, East Timour, Checko-Slovakia, you can even argue that the soviet union break up was democratic since they all became democracies.
Not to mention install dictatorships.
Do you know English? or how life works?

People don't install dictators, but they can certainly remove them.

It was the Pakistani people who removed all dictators.
India can't even remove one butcher so I would not expect you to understand.
 
Normally I repsect your views Joe, but you are clearly only espousing Indian view here. A view that we Pakistanis reject.



I have already given my evidence, you ignored it, so I don't need to re-sate it.
Countries that have democratically seperated: South Sudan, East Timour, Checko-Slovakia, you can even argue that the soviet union break up was democratic since they all became democracies.

Do you know English? or how life works?

People don't install dictators, but they can certainly remove them.

It was the Pakistani people who removed all dictators.
India can't even remove one butcher so I would not expect you to understand.
Yawn. Looks like your knowledge of history is as pathetic as your English.

One elected leader wasn't allowed to assume office. Didn't Ayub win an election against Jinnah's sister?
 
Normally I repsect your views Joe, but you are clearly only espousing Indian view here. A view that we Pakistanis reject.

On law and order matters, I reflect what I think ought to be the Indian view; this is often not what the government of India says or wishes to have said by all Indians.

On historical matters, I am very careful to be objective, and will happily review anything that you think is inaccurate in my narration.

I have already given my evidence, you ignored it, so I don't need to re-sate it.
Countries that have democratically seperated: South Sudan, East Timour, Checko-Slovakia, you can even argue that the soviet union break up was democratic since they all became democracies.

Do you know English? or how life works?

People don't install dictators, but they can certainly remove them.

It was the Pakistani people who removed all dictators.
India can't even remove one butcher so I would not expect you to understand.
 
Call me hate preacher extremist or whatever but I think we really really need our own gulag somewhere in siachen
This self proclaimed khooni liberal brigade needs to be contained its high time our government recognizes that our nation has liberal problem and its spreading like cancer

Agreed
 
Not interested in Pakistani stuff

Im dont want no Pakistani tomatoes!! I want those indian red tomatoes that Modi ji has banned!! Please sell us those red tomatoes, how are we suppose to live without those red tomatoes from that kanjar khanna
 
Im dont want no Pakistani tomatoes!! I want those indian red tomatoes that Modi ji has banned!! Please sell us those red tomatoes, how are we suppose to live without those red tomatoes from that kanjar khanna
U can buy via amazon
 
more than 2 years old but on a lighter note, this song is still so relevant. I hear its been a hit in Kashmir since it came out despite the internet shut downs.

 
retarded answer, but don't expect much fron Indians.

Who do you thik ended thouse dictatorships?
It was the people of Pakistan.
So again, we the people are Pakistan are infinatly better at being decent humans then Indians could ever hope for.

Not only do we condemn what is wrong, but we have also brought down dictatorships, multiple times.

Meanwhile Indian people can ony hunt and murder helpless minorities.


So you would agree that you were the only ones who brought those weak leadership which was eventually taken over by Army multiple times....
 
Why cant you sell those red tomatoes? Your country is a poverty stricken supa powa i dont think it can afford holding back those red tomatoes
We want to make sure ouro dearly neighbor Pakistan saves some of their foreign exchange reserves:cheesy:
There are many other nations who can buy our tomatoes. Thanks for your concern:welcome:
 

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom