Pakistanis condemning Pulwama terror strike on social media

[pahadi]

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10156988029984730

"Aman Ki Asha" group, all women, all liberals, where's their condemnation of the hell Indian paramilitary troops have unleashed on Kashmir?

I don't have a Facebook account, could someone post these images at them.

Waz I don't know what you feel about Indian actions, but whatever happens in kashmir is all because of pakistani interference, the people that were radicalized in 1980's and 1990's are parents now and their kids have the same radicalized mindset, their is nothing wrong happening to Indian Muslims except 2-3 cases that are politically motivated to incite violence.
You won't agree with me but nobody who loves their children would send them to die, this is what extremists have done to humanity.
And again no country would like it's integrity to be offended, In case of India Kashmir also holds a great significance regarding water security.
If you really want them to be happy you need to give India a chance to develop the area, good education, peaceful environment, hospitals, electricity, resources everything.
Or the only option left with both the parties would be War that would end every thing because one party was too insecure about other being dominant.
Don't ban me for my views...

 

[Desert Fox]

British Indian army had 2.5 million men in 1945---Means you guys shouldn't consider ghandhi as your baapu since you were happy under the raj and didn't need independence. @Desert Fox

Lol going by their logic that was exactly the case.

Do these dumb betches even understanding what they are doing?

Somebody captures portion of your house and hijacks your family members, beats them, rapes them, kills them and when finally some of the poor family member kills few of the hijackers, are you gonna talk about humanity then? Dafuq's wrong with some people?

Its social media fame, people will do anything for fame nowadays.

 

[Jackdaws]

Bring it up again then.

Why? Time has passed.

 

[Zibago]

Indian media is clutching at straws

 

[Hareeb]

So you are against people wanting peace?

Nope but only if wanting peace does turn into supporting India by default.

 

[waz]

It's always the "Aman" ka Tamasha crowd, very quick to sellout their national interests and principles for $ocial media popularity and Bollywood.

These scums need to be sent to the LoC for a change where they can spend some time with our jawans under fire, hell send their @sses to siachen to give them a dose of the hardships and sacrifices our men make safeguarding and upholding their Pakistan while these traitors and sellouts sip their chai in the comfort of their expensive homes in gated upper class communities in Lahore and Islamabad fantasizing about Bollywood.

This is what happens when you allow a considerable portion of your populace to become softies addicted to superficiality and materialism.

I could understand the actions of a traitor if there was some level of gain e.g. financial, but for social media likes just goes to show retarded these people are.
Honestly bro they don't deserve to be anywhere near the brave men on the LOC, I also don't want them polluting my ancestral land of Azad Kashmir. What needs to happen is that they are thrown across the LOC into occupied Kashmir so they can experience first hand how much 'love' the forces will give.

One must wonder how many little girl servants she must have in her household doing slave labor so she can have all the free time to be a champion of human rights on the internet.

Yes that would be interesting to see.

It says she writes of 'outlook India', which says it all.

That's right dig a little and the crap soon comes to the surface.

 

[Psychic]

Lol going by their logic that was exactly the case.

In case of India Kashmir also holds a great significance regarding water security.

but whatever happens in kashmir is all because of pakistani interference, the people that were radicliarad in 1980's and 1990's are parents now and their kids have the same radicalized mindset,

Nice way to justify war crimes.

Perhaps it could've proven useful in reducing voilence in Kashmir had you guys checked under your own hood before pointing fingers towards Pakistan.

Voilence begets voilence---we learned our lesson from Balochistan, your egos however or rather your hatred towards Kashmiris who demand independence wouldn't let you adopt a soft approach.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41268906
Here's one example of the war crime which people like you justify by saying stuff like had they not demanded independence, we wouldn't have done that...

this is what extremists have done to humanity.

Maqbool Bhat wasn't a religious extremist. Neither was JKLF or JKNLA which were/are nationalist organizations demanding total freedom , unlike the Islamists.

Anyways it's the usual Indian propaganda @Desert Fox

 

[Rusty]

What stopped you following your own advice in '48 and '65? Why Pakistan decided to take Kashmir by force then? And expect India to follow Canada, Chek, Sudan and Timur? Should India act according to Pakistan's whims?

Okay let me teach you some history.
During our freedom, all states were given choice of India, Pakistan, or freedom.
Both India and Pakistan (hypocritically) did not allow the thrid option
Hydrabad exercised her rights and voted Paksitan. India then invaded, violating the agreement.
Kashmir wanted independence, but Pakistan made that claim that it was Muslim majority so it invaded.

But India in its full retard mode got itself involed for no reason.
Now here we are 70 years later and you and you are making an innocent face and asking "What can India do, we are stuck "


No one is sympathetic to India here, she made this mess only by herself and and she alone has the power to end it by a simple vote.

Of course, mentally ill hindutva won't allow people any true freedom so the killings and murders will continue.

Absolutely wrong!
Democracy is only a form of government that allows people to choose their own leaders through a vote. It’s about representation, not sovereignty.
Democracy does not guarantee the right to sovereignty over land.
Are you suggesting that if majority of people in my building in nyc want to free ourselves and form a new country in the middle of manhattan, that it is our right and that we should be allowed so?!

Show me an instance where democracy gives you that right.

A vote for plebiscite is not democracy. Please understand the difference. The former is a means to an end, the latter a form of government, ie. Once you have established rule over land, who governs the land. Democracy would come as a next step to plebiscite if the people choose that form of governance.

1. No you are wrong.
And 2.
India promised Kashmir a vote as part of the treaty with the Maharaja.
This vote has nothing to do with Pakistan or the UN.
You are legally obligated to give a vote.

But again, we know that India really a Religious-Fascist state and not a true democracy.

 

[waz]

Waz I don't know what you feel about Indian actions, but whatever happens in kashmir is all because of pakistani interference, the people that were radicalized in 1980's and 1990's are parents now and their kids have the same radicalized mindset, their is nothing wrong happening to Indian Muslims except 2-3 cases that are politically motivated to incite violence.
You won't agree with me but nobody who loves their children would send them to die, this is what extremists have done to humanity.
And again no country would like it's integrity to be offended, In case of India Kashmir also holds a great significance regarding water security.
If you really want them to be happy you need to give India a chance to develop the area, good education, peaceful environment, hospitals, electricity, resources everything.
Or the only option left with both the parties would be War that would end every thing because one party was too insecure about other being dominant.
Don't ban me for my views...

There has been chaos there since the place had become a bone of contention between Pakistan and India. As for there being no radicalisation before the 80's and 90's, that's incorrect as we had the Prophet(saws) riots during the 1963.
As for India's Muslims I learnt everything I needed from the Gujarat riots. Regardless it's none of my business what India's Muslims do, my business is with the Kashmiri folk.
The kids were not sent to die, many have been caught in crossfire coming home from school, some have been deliberately shot to teach them a lesson! Look at their ages, these are not teenage youth.
As for security (territory) I agree that no nation can compromise that but you do not need it for water security, not at all. It's Pakistan's share of rivers which run through the valley.
I understand you good intentions regarding developing Kashmir but it's just too late for that now. The damage has been and the region is beyond the point of no return.
I won't ban you for your views, the vast majority of Indian folk here say what they want.

 

[pahadi]

Nice way to justify war crimes.

Perhaps it could've proven useful in reducing voilence in Kashmir had you guys checked under your own hood before pointing fingers towards Pakistan.

Voilence begets voilence---we learned our lesson from Balochistan, your egos however or rather your hatred towards Kashmiris who demand independence wouldn't let you adopt a soft approach.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-41268906
Here's one example of the war crime which people like you justify by saying stuff like had they not demanded independence, we wouldn't have done that...

Maqbool Bhat wasn't a religious extremist. Neither was JKLF or JKNLA which were nationalist organizations demanding total freedom , unlike the Islamists.

Anyways it's the usual Indian propaganda @Desert Fox

All was good before entry of ISI and it's proxies, if you call this genocide, then what will you call Jew being killed by Germany, rohingyas being killed by Myanmar, muslims of xinjiang being killed by Chinese, Japan killings during world war 2?
India is still giving terrorists a chance to surrender, pakistan does not even talk to bad terrorists...

 

[Jackdaws]

Okay let me teach you some history.
During our freedom, all states were given choice of India, Pakistan, or freedom.
Both India and Pakistan (hypocritically) did not allow the thrid option
Hydrabad exercised her rights and voted Paksitan. India then invaded, violating the agreement.
Kashmir wanted independence, but Pakistan made that claim that it was Muslim majority so it invaded.

But India in its full retard mode got itself involed for no reason.
Now here we are 70 years later and you and you are making an innocent face and asking "What can India do, we are stuck "


No one is sympathetic to India here, she made this mess only by herself and and she alone has the power to end it by a simple vote.

Of course, mentally ill hindutva won't allow people any true freedom so the killings and murders will continue.



1. No you are wrong.
And 2.
India promised Kashmir a vote as part of the treaty with the Maharaja.
This vote has nothing to do with Pakistan or the UN.
You are legally obligated to give a vote.

But again, we know that India really a Religious-Fascist state and not a true democracy.

Looks like someone hasn't read history.

Hyderabad did never accede to Pakistan. It had an Arab General leading its forces. It also signed a Standstill Agreement with India which was violated by Hyderabad.

On the other hand and @Joe Shearer can confirm this - Pakistan too signed a Standstill Agreement with Kashmir which Pakistan violated.

 

[pahadi]

There has been chaos there since the place had become a bone of contention between Pakistan and India. As for there being no radicalisation before the 80's and 90's, that's incorrect as we had the Prophet(saws) riots during the 1963.
As for India's Muslims I learnt everything I needed from the Gujarat riots. Regardless it's none of my business what India's Muslims do, my business is with the Kashmiri folk.
The kids were not sent to die, many have been caught in crossfire coming home from school, some have been deliberately shot to teach them a lesson! Look at their ages, these are not teenage youth.
As for security (territory) I agree that no nation can compromise that but you do not need it for water security, not at all. It's Pakistan's share of rivers which run through the valley.
I understand you good intentions regarding developing Kashmir but it's just too late for that now. The damage has been and the region is beyond the point of no return.
I won't ban you for your views, the vast majority of Indian folk here say what they want.

• Brengi River or Bringhi River
• Chaga Tokpo River - a tributary of Pangong lake
• Chang Chen Mo River - a tributary of Shyok river
• Chenab River
• Chip Chap River
• Doda River or Stod River
• Dras River
• Dudhganga - is a tributary of the Jhelum that flows from Ludurmarg and rises in the central Pir Panjal range near Tatakooti Peak. Two mountain streams, the Sangesafed and the Yachera, form this river. This river flows through Batmalu Swamp near Srinagar.
• Galwan River
• Indus River
• Jhelum River
• Kulung Pa - a tributary of Pangong lake
• Lidder River or Liddar River
• Lingdi Nadi - a tributary of Tso Moririlake
• Markha River
• Nala Palkhu
• Neelum River or Kishanganga river
• Nubra River
• Pare Chu river - a tributary of Sutlejriver
• Poonch River
• Rambi Ara
• Ravi River
• Sandran River
• Saltoro River
• Shingo River
• Shyok River
• Sind River
• Tawi River
• Tsarap River
• Ujh River
• Ungti Chu river - a tributary of Sutlej river
• Veshaw River
• Yapola River
• Zanskar River

Sorry waz but that's too many to be given to you, India will give water security to pakistan.
If we give Kashmir to you, I assure you that China and pakistan would kill himachal Pradesh, Punjab, haryana and Delhi dry, these states feed India, provide electricity to North India, it's too big a cost to be paid.

 

[Psychic]

, pakistan does not even talk to bad terrorists...

We don't talk, we offer them jobs, loans and their children free education and health services @Desert Fox
https://pakobserver.net/434-militants-surrender-balochistan/
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1851153/1-militant-commander-70-militants-surrender-quetta/
http://pakistan.asia-news.com/en_GB/articles/cnmi_pf/features/2017/12/11/feature-01
https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2018/11/20/70-bra-militants-surrender-weapons-in-quetta/

All was good before entry of ISI and it's proxies

All was good till they realized that their peaceful struggle will lead them nowhere---so they decided to adopt the method of the Afghans.

Hyderabad did never accede to Pakistan. It had an Arab General leading its forces. It also signed a Standstill Agreement with India which was violated by Hyderabad.

Junagadh and Manavadar acceded to Pakistan. Indian army invaded and annexed them.
Nizam chose to remain independent, still Indian army invaded.
Indian army invaded all three areas under the pretext that the majority population of these states is Hindu.
But I guess for the nation whose one founding father seduced the wife of a married man while the other indulged in orgies and homosexuality, being a hypocrite comes natural.

You've got no moral leg to stand on when you claim Kashmir on the basis of instrument of accession.
You can't have it both ways.
@Desert Fox

 

[waz]

• Brengi River or Bringhi River
• Chaga Tokpo River - a tributary of Pangong lake
• Chang Chen Mo River - a tributary of Shyok river
• Chenab River
• Chip Chap River
• Doda River or Stod River
• Dras River
• Dudhganga - is a tributary of the Jhelum that flows from Ludurmarg and rises in the central Pir Panjal range near Tatakooti Peak. Two mountain streams, the Sangesafed and the Yachera, form this river. This river flows through Batmalu Swamp near Srinagar.
• Galwan River
• Indus River
• Jhelum River
• Kulung Pa - a tributary of Pangong lake
• Lidder River or Liddar River
• Lingdi Nadi - a tributary of Tso Moririlake
• Markha River
• Nala Palkhu
• Neelum River or Kishanganga river
• Nubra River
• Pare Chu river - a tributary of Sutlejriver
• Poonch River
• Rambi Ara
• Ravi River
• Sandran River
• Saltoro River
• Shingo River
• Shyok River
• Sind River
• Tawi River
• Tsarap River
• Ujh River
• Ungti Chu river - a tributary of Sutlej river
• Veshaw River
• Yapola River
• Zanskar River

Sorry waz but that's too many to be given to you, India will give water security to pakistan.
If we give Kashmir to you, I assure you that China and pakistan would kill himachal Pradesh, Punjab, haryana and Delhi dry, these states feed India, provide electricity to North India, it's too big a cost to be paid.

Pakistan would not kill any Indian state. You can't store water or interfere it as such in Kashmir.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Why? Time has passed.

No it hasn't. There isn't any expiration date on the UNSC Resolutions, just as there isn't one on the Durand Agreement demarcating the Afghan-Pakistan border.

Indian media is clutching at straws

Straws, cow dung, monkey poo ... whatever shite they can find really.