What's new

Pakistani Military Still Cultivates Militant Groups - More US Propaganda

then what are Drones doing in your country??

There is no one group..............there are lot of groups and they are under nobody's control............some are funded by CIA, Mosad and RAW and which don't accept their money and weapons ..............they are getting Drones attacks.
 
.
The alleged 'militant leader' was only able to name the presence of FORMER military officials at these so called meetings, most who had either been out of service for years, or had been dismissed from service for their conduct/extremist ties.

Beyond that there is nothing here but unverifiable and outlandish speculation and claims.

A 'Wing of the ISI paid $50 and $500', utterly ludicrous. Payments would be in Rupees in any case ....

And why on earth would the ISI want to continue to support Hakimullah Mehsud, when he killed Colonel Tarrar, one of the 'key figures' present at these alleged Taliban meetings devising a plan to fight the US in Afghanistan, and why would the ISI continue to support Hakimullah Mehsud, when he has bombed ISI headquarters, attacked mosques and training grounds for the military, and helped stall Pakistan's economy, without which the military cannot generate funds to support its war machine.

Way too many outlandish claims and loopholes in this story - definitely a propaganda piece by the US Establishement.

And then CENTCOM has the gall to come here and criticize us 'bloggers' for countering this propaganda.
 
.
The alleged 'militant leader' was only able to name the presence of FORMER military officials at these so called meetings, most who had either been out of service for years, or had been dismissed from service for their conduct/extremist ties.

Beyond that there is nothing here but unverifiable and outlandish speculation and claims.

A 'Wing of the ISI paid $50 and $500', utterly ludicrous. Payments would be in Rupees in any case ....

.

It says "Fighters were paid about $50 a month, he said," and commanders about $500.

Although the military has lost control of many of the firebrand fighters, and has little influence over the foreign fighters in the tribal areas who belong to Al Qaeda — some of whom openly oppose the Pakistani government — it was reluctant to move against them, he said. Pakistan could easily kill the notoriously vicious militant leader of the Pakistani Taliban, Hakimullah Mehsud, but chose not to, he said. “If someone gave me 20,000 rupees, I would do it,” he said, citing a price of about $235.

Also the former military officials are continuing, what they were doing perfectly while in active duty. Nothing surprise here. Its a shame, where persons paid by Pakistani military/government are involved in these activities even after getting paid back by the same coin. Either Pakistan should change its policy or get destroyed by the militants, which its still cultivating.

NY times is not "Rupee News" or the in-famous "Wike-Gate" news house to unleash propaganda or publish outlandish claims.
 
.
It says "Fighters were paid about $50 a month, he said,", he said, and commanders about $500.
Sure, and earlier he quoted '20,000 Rupees', which C Gall translated to dollars, so why shift into dollar figures suddenly, especially when payments in Pakistan would likely be in Rupees anyway?

And the ISI would have no 'wing' distributing funds - far to easy to track. Bunch of lies is what this is.
Although the military has lost control of many of the firebrand fighters, and has little influence over the foreign fighters in the tribal areas who belong to Al Qaeda — some of whom openly oppose the Pakistani government — it was reluctant to move against them, he said. Pakistan could easily kill the notoriously vicious militant leader of the Pakistani Taliban, Hakimullah Mehsud, but chose not to, he said. “If someone gave me 20,000 rupees, I would do it,” he said, citing a price of about $235.
As I said, given the attacks against the Military, intelligence and the State that Hakimullah Mehsud has led, why would the military want to 'coddle him'? If anything, they would keep killing the leaders until they found one who was more compliant, if they really meant to keep the TTP as an 'asset'.

Most of the claims are nonsensical and clearly propaganda - coming on the heels of recent tensions between the US and Pakistan, this kind of propaganda by the US establishment is not surprising, and reflective of the deceitful and treacherous nature of the US Establishment.
 
.
Pretty standard policy for all countries to be supporting a militant group or rather a whole range of them. America/India and Russia were and continue to be very supportive of the Northern Alliance. Wouldn't they be considered a "Militant group" ?
Pakistan neither nurtures nor supports any militant groups though we do maintain neutrality with some which is the sensible thing to do because the Americans and Nato will leave one day but we and the groups are here to stay.
 
.
Sure, and earlier he quoted '20,000 Rupees', which C Gall translated to dollars, so why shift into dollar figures suddenly, especially when payments in Pakistan would likely be in Rupees anyway?

And the ISI would have no 'wing' distributing funds - far to easy to track. Bunch of lies is what this is.

As I said, given the attacks against the Military, intelligence and the State that Hakimullah Mehsud has led, why would the military want to 'coddle him'? If anything, they would keep killing the leaders until they found one who was more compliant, if they really meant to keep the TTP as an 'asset'.

Most of the claims are nonsensical and clearly propaganda - coming on the heels of recent tensions between the US and Pakistan, this kind of propaganda by the US establishment is not surprising, and reflective of the deceitful and treacherous nature of the US Establishment.

This article was meant for Global audiences, so countering an article based on the currency its quoted doesn't make sense. Moreover, he has quoted both in dollars and Rupees which makes sense.

The recent raid on the Bomb factory in Pakistan clearly shows how Pakistan military collaborates with militants. The US has clearly questioned the Pakistani military/ISI on this? Also it has been mentioned that the military supports militants, who attacks them, because of other strategic gains. Even your former military head/president had accepted that they train militants. Even if you think its a propaganda, there are some vital points in the article, which is worth to consider. The policy that Pakistan has been following for more than 30 years, using terrorism as a tool and using religion as a inspiration to attract people to militancy has miserably failed. Time to change that before it topples Pakistan.
 
.
This article was meant for Global audiences, so countering an article based on the currency its quoted doesn't make sense. Moreover, he has quoted both in dollars and Rupees which makes sense.

The recent raid on the Bomb factory in Pakistan clearly shows how Pakistan military collaborates with militants. The US has clearly questioned the Pakistani military/ISI on this? Also it has been mentioned that the military supports militants, who attacks them, because of other strategic gains. Even your former military head/president had accepted that they train militants. Even if you think its a propaganda, there are some vital points in the article, which is worth to consider. The policy that Pakistan has been following for more than 30 years, using terrorism as a tool and using religion as a inspiration to attract people to militancy has miserably failed. Time to change that before it topples Pakistan.

You tell us, it's America's policy. The word Jihad had been missing in the muslim vocabulary for over 1000 years. You re-introduced it to paint the war against the Soviets as a muslim duty. Only problem was that after the Soviets collapsed, America itself began to fall true to the description it had painted of an "Oppressor" so it's actually your policy that is the reason for suffering in much of the world.
 
. .
ISLAMABAD, Pakistan — The Pakistani military continues to nurture a broad range of militant groups as part of a three-decade strategy of using proxies against its neighbors and American forces in Afghanistan, but now some of the fighters it trained are questioning that strategy, a prominent former militant commander says.

The former commander said that he was supported by the Pakistani military for 15 years as a fighter, leader and trainer of insurgents until he quit a few years ago. Well known in militant circles but accustomed to a covert existence, he gave an interview to The New York Times on the condition that his name, location and other personal details not be revealed.

Militant groups, like Lashkar-e-Taiba, Harakat-ul-Mujahedeen and Hizbul Mujahedeen, are run by religious leaders, with the Pakistani military providing training, strategic planning and protection. That system was still functioning, he said.

The former commander’s account belies years of assurances by Pakistan to American officials since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that it has ceased supporting militant groups in its territory. The United States has given Pakistan more than $20 billion in aid over the past decade for its help with counterterrorism operations. Still, the former commander said, Pakistan’s military and intelligence establishment has not abandoned its policy of supporting the militant groups as tools in Pakistan’s dispute with India over the border territory of Kashmir and in Afghanistan to drive out American and NATO forces.

“There are two bodies running these affairs: mullahs and retired generals,” he said. He named a number of former military officials involved in the program, including former chiefs of the intelligence service and other former generals. “These people have a very big role still,” he said.

Maj. Gen. Zaheer ul-Islam Abbasi, a former intelligence officer who was convicted of attempting a coup against the government of Benazir Bhutto in 1995 and who is now dead, was one of the most active supporters of the militant groups in the years after Sept. 11, the former commander said.

He said he saw General Abbasi several times: once at a meeting of Taliban and Pakistani militant leaders in Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Province as they planned how to confront the American military in Afghanistan; and twice in Mir Ali, which became the center for foreign militants in Pakistan’s tribal areas, including members of Al Qaeda.

There were about 60 people at the Taliban meeting in late 2001, soon after the Taliban government fell, the former commander said. Pakistani militant leaders were present, as were the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan, Abdul Salam Zaeef, and Muhammad Haqqani, a member of the Haqqani network.

Several retired officials of Pakistan’s premier spy agency, the Directorate for Inter-Services Intelligence, or ISI, were also there, he said, including a man known as Colonel Imam but who was actually Brig. Sultan Amir, a well-known trainer and mentor of militants, and General Abbasi. The militant groups divided Afghanistan into separate areas of operations and discussed how to “trip up America,” he said.

The Pakistani military still supports the Afghan Taliban in their fight to force out American and NATO forces from Afghanistan, he said, adding that he thought they would be successful.

The ISI also still supports other Pakistani militant groups, even some of those that have turned against the government, because the military still wants to keep them as tools for use against its archrival, India, he said. The military used a strategy of divide and rule, encouraging splits in the militant groups to weaken and control them, he said.

Although the military has lost control of many of the firebrand fighters, and has little influence over the foreign fighters in the tribal areas who belong to Al Qaeda — some of whom openly oppose the Pakistani government — it was reluctant to move against them, he said. Pakistan could easily kill the notoriously vicious militant leader of the Pakistani Taliban, Hakimullah Mehsud, but chose not to, he said. “If someone gave me 20,000 rupees, I would do it,” he said, citing a price of about $235.

“The government is not interested in eliminating them permanently,” he said. “The Pakistani military establishment has become habituated to using proxies.” He added that there were many sympathizers in the military who still supported the use of militants.

Pakistan has 12,000 to 14,000 fully trained Kashmiri fighters, scattered throughout various camps in Pakistan, and is holding them in reserve to use if needed in a war against India, he said.

Yet Pakistan has been losing the fight for Kashmir, and most Kashmiris now want independence and not to be part of Pakistan or India, he said. Since Sept. 11, Pakistan has redirected much of its attention away from Kashmir to Afghanistan, and many Kashmiri fighters are not interested in that fight and have taken up India’s offer of an amnesty to go home.


Others, like the former commander, have gotten out because of their disillusionment over the way they were being used to fight Osama bin Laden’s war, or used for the aims of a few top generals who had allied Pakistan with the United States to gain access to its military and financial aid. “There are a lot of people who do not think they are doing the right thing,” he said of the military.

“This is extremely wrong to sacrifice 16,000 people for a single person,” he said, referring to Bin Laden. “A person should sacrifice himself for 16,000 people.” He said he was using the figure of 16,000 just as an example.

“The Taliban lost a whole government for one person,” he said, again referring to Bin Laden. “And Pakistan went to war just for a few generals and now for President Zardari,” he said, referring to Asif Ali Zardari. “A real war is for a country.”

Many of the thousands of trained Pakistani fighters turned against the military because it treated them so carelessly, he said. “Pakistan used them and then, like a paper tissue, threw them away,” he said. “Look at me, I am a very well-trained fighter and I have no other option in life, except to fight and take revenge.”

Indeed, he was first trained for a year by the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba at a camp in Kunar Province, in Afghanistan, in the early 1990s. The war against Soviet troops in Afghanistan was over, and Pakistan turned to training fighters for an insurgency in the Indian-controlled part of Kashmir.

He became skilled at firing Russian-made rocket-propelled grenades, and he was sent to fight, and train others, in Kashmir, Bosnia, Chechnya and Afghanistan. Over the years he worked with different militant groups, and he estimated that he personally trained up to 4,000 fighters.

The entire enterprise was supported by the Pakistani military and executed by Pakistani militant groups, he said. He was paid by a wing of the ISI, which is an integral part of the army.

Fighters were paid about $50 a month, he said, and commanders about $500.

But now, he said, Pakistan and the United States would be much better able to counter terrorism if they could redirect the legions of militants toward the correct path of Islam to rebuild and educate communities, he said.

“Pakistan, and especially America, needs to understand the true spirit of Islam, and they need to project the true spirit of Islam,” he said. “That would be a good strategy to stop them.”


http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/04/world/asia/04pakistan.html?_r=1&hp

Idiotic & lunatic article.
What a pathetic attitude.

Their cultivation was harvested by Pakistan and US is forgetting that it was sowed by them. They have no right to blame on us where they itself cultivated TTP and providing safe heavens for Swat militants.
 
.
This article was meant for Global audiences, so countering an article based on the currency its quoted doesn't make sense. Moreover, he has quoted both in dollars and Rupees which makes sense.
I am not countering the article solely on the basis of the inconsistent use of 'currency', but the various other outlandish claims, that a militant leader would have no clue about. No 'ISI Wing' is going to advertize itself to any militant, leader or foot soldier, as 'being responsible for distributing funds'. They don't run HR offices for the militants to contact in case of payment issues.

And the US, Pakistan and various other nations have themselves argued that the majority of the financing for these groups comes from
(1) Arab Nations, specifically the Gulf Nations, through illegal channels mostly
(2) Drug trade, smuggling, gun running, kidnapping, extortion and various other crimes.

So how exactly is now the ISI 'paying $50 to a fighter and $500 to a leader'? Or why on earth is the ISI even bothering to provide funds when the militants have a whole bunch of finance sources already?

Like I said, too many loopholes in this story - its a bunch of lies, perhaps not by the journalist herself, but certainly by this alleged 'militant leader'. And these lies and propaganda will be lapped up by the target audience in the West, as part of the continuing smear campaign against Pakistan's military and intelligence, to put pressurize Pakistan to back down in the latest tensions between the US-Pakistan.

Outright thuggery and deceit by the US Establishment is what this is.

The recent raid on the Bomb factory in Pakistan clearly shows how Pakistan military collaborates with militants. The US has clearly questioned the Pakistani military/ISI on this?
The media nonsense on the recent bomb factory raids has already been countered officially by Pakistan. Please see the relevant thread linked below. And BTW, did the US Establishment even offer an official set of allegations backed with evidence, or was this all the usual 'anonymous sources propaganda'?

http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakistans-war/115313-pakistan-army-intel-bomb-sites-wrong.html

Also it has been mentioned that the military supports militants, who attacks them, because of other strategic gains. Even your former military head/president had accepted that they train militants. Even if you think its a propaganda, there are some vital points in the article, which is worth to consider. The policy that Pakistan has been following for more than 30 years, using terrorism as a tool and using religion as a inspiration to attract people to militancy has miserably failed. Time to change that before it topples Pakistan.
Please explain to me what 'other strategic gains' you are referring to, that Pakistan would gain from supporting the likes of the TTP and Hakimullah Mehsud, who have so far been virtually non-existent in their role in Afghanistan against NATO/ANA?

The only thing the TTP and Hakimullah Mehsud have done so far is carry out perhaps thousands of suicide bombings and attacks against Pakistan's intelligence agency, military, paramilitaries, police and civilians. They have tried to foment sectarian strife by targeting various minority sects and communities, and set back the economy severely, and in fact caused 'strategic concerns' by allowing the international community to talk about the risk to Pakistan's nuclear program and weapons.

Just this fact alone makes the 'interview and claims' of this alleged 'militant leader' ludicrous and fanciful.
 
.
Pakistan should support these terrorists now . USA NATO still don't trust us . its looking like we are fighting with both TALIBAN and USA NATO . so we should support taliban at least one side stop bombing us ,
 
.
Pakistan should support these terrorists now . USA NATO still don't trust us . its looking like we are fighting with both TALIBAN and USA NATO . so we should support taliban at least one side stop bombing us ,

If that comes out known to CIA, NATO will bomb you tenfold more than what gun-totting Taliban can do. Rather do the opposite and improve your status. Kayani is taking a sensible step for once, withdrawing troops from eastern border and focusing on the real problem. Support his thinking and get out of the mess your country is in.
 
.
Kayani’s gamble

kiyani's gamble apparently indians admit pakistan has lowered its troops on the LoC and border with india!
Tshering:

His point is that the argument that 'Pakistan is retaining these militants for war with India' does not fly if we look at the fact that Kayani has deployed a significant number of troops away from the Indian front. IF Pakistan was really interested in 'cultivating militant groups for use against India', we would not be shifting hundreds of thousands of troops and related assets to FATA to fight insurgents.
 
.
I am amazed at how bad this new propaganda piece is from the NYTimes. All a part of the White House's pressure tactics on Pakistan.

What these idiots don't realize is that ISI is a very integral part of the army. If an officer one day is stationed in FATA or Swat fighting against taliban, the next day he may find himself in the ISI if he gets the position. That same officer who has fought and seen his fellow soldiers die or get injured against the taliban is not going to become pro-taliban when he joins the ISI. If anything, what we have seen as the army has engaged with the taliban all over FATA and Swat, the hardline attitude against the taliban has only increased among the rank and file. The army is big, but not that big that word doesn't get around as more units are rotated into the fight with the taliban that these people are the enemy. There is no question of the ISI supporting any group that has taken up arms against the state.

The Western tattoos are not able to comprehend this simple fact. Many of them have already made up their mind just like they did with the Iraqi WMDs. If they thing antagonizing Pakistan with this cheap third rate propaganda is going to help them, they have only themselves to blame for the consequences.

I admit that I used to have a soft spot for the West, but my level of disdain of the West is getting near my level of disdain for the taliban. Oh well.
 
.
Tshering:

His point is that the argument that 'Pakistan is retaining these militants for war with India' does not fly if we look at the fact that Kayani has deployed a significant number of troops away from the Indian front. IF Pakistan was really interested in 'cultivating militant groups for use against India', we would not be shifting hundreds of thousands of troops and related assets to FATA to fight insurgents.

The fact is that Pakistan has in the past retained these groups for its proxy war against India .. I think Musharraf did admit to that somewhere.. But now that the monster has grown bigger than expected, and is now attacking its erstwhile master, Pak has not option but to kill it, since reining it in doesnt seem possible anymore..
 
.
Back
Top Bottom