What's new

Pakistani kingdoms in mythical Mahabharat epic

.
I'm 100% sure, you're not a dogra or jammuite. You're from Uttarkhand or some other shithole. And for the point, I'm no Minhaas, you idiot. Was merely pointing out that they are one of the largest rajput clans in my home region.

And it doesn't matter if you accept them to be Jamwaal or not, no one gives a !@#$. The Mair-Minhaas of Chakwal had sided with the Sikhs against British, hence their lands were confiscated by the Brits. The chieftains of the said clan then approached Gulab Singh Dogra, and shared their family tree with him, which made him intervene on their behalf and hence the relationship between them and the Brits got back to normal.

I'm sure you're 45% "South Indian", genetic chamar from Uttarkhand pretending to be a Scythian Jammuwal(lol).



Thanks man. I generally comment on history based articles. And I'm afraid I can't answer such a question on a public forum. Apologies.



These pictures can be deceiving. Im sure if youth went to G-B region of Pakistan, you would be called a "kaalia"(black). They are in all likelihood the lightest skinned and lightest eyed people in Pakistan.
LAMO now a convert Bhangi would tell me about my ancestry and why would it even be a matter as we are not cousin lovers like potohari shudra.

And I give a advice if you ever find a Jamwal,Dogra or Katoch don't even mention them as a rajput as they won't let a convert masquerading as rajput came 100 metre near them.

Potohari rajput (Agnikul) Descendant of KUSH
551032979.jpg
 
.
LAMO now a convert Bhangi would tell me about my ancestry and why would it even be a matter as we are not cousin lovers like potohari shudra.

And I give a advice if you ever find a Jamwal,Dogra or Katoch don't even mention them as a rajput as they won't let a convert masquerading as rajput came 100 metre near them.

Potohari rajput (Agnikul) Descendant of KUSH
View attachment 225920
I found many Pakistanis claiming themselves rajputs?are these fellows not rajputs?how do Hindu rajputs treat them if they come across them?
 
. .
Omg:rofl: you indians are delusional

Out of all the subcontinent its the people of Pakistan which are better looking, taller, fairer and stronger

This is because most of our people are punjabi kashmiri pathan or north Pakistani

Random photos aside you can see this amongst clearly unless you are a dark delusional indian

Even indian women repeatedly state Pakistanis are better looking

Buzzfeed India Editor Comes In For Vicious Sexist Attack On Twitter
why are you so ashamed to see those pics all of them are weak 40 kg grunts
I found many Pakistanis claiming themselves rajputs?are these fellows not rajputs?how do Hindu rajputs treat them if they come across them?
May I ask you which Rajput clan in India Claim themselves suryavanshi but Marry their own Cousin Sister.

Muslims do not have rajput clan but sects but yet these shameless outcastes associate themselves with Hindu Mythology
 
Last edited:
.
I found many Pakistanis claiming themselves rajputs?are these fellows not rajputs?how do Hindu rajputs treat them if they come across them?

If I ever came cross any hindu rajput I would slap the f out of him, fucking useless midgets

Look at rajput regiment

15ovz9h.jpg


Embarassing to say the least. Look more like mochis.

1. All the regions of the World existed before they were rediscovered, rechristened, renamed, or remodelled. The argument does not hold a flag. I'm sure they existed 6000 years ago as well, not just 5000 years ago.

2. The newly formed Pakistani govt. guided by its forward thinking leaders decided to abandon the history of their own land and people that was thousands of years old. They tried to be more "Islamic"(read Arab) and more closely related to the invaders of India, where as in reality almost all Pakistanis are those who have been converted to Islam by the invaders.

3. While there is nothing wrong with religion, one cannot nitpick when it comes to which historical identity to choose. You cannot have both, let alone best of both. The Egyptians, for example, are mostly Muslims, nowadays, but that doesn't mean they have forsaken what they actually are. They don't name their weapons after their own invaders. So, it's not a question of geography, rather it's the philosophy one chooses and the decisions one make. Pakistani leaders have made that decision for you, and assumed an identity for the country, which is loosely based around "not being India". Try to live with that.

@ghoul I have gone through what you have said, regarding topic and I must say, your points are impressive. However, changes don't happen overnight and lot of wind has to blow, before the prevalent mentality in Pakistan changes.

Its all nice and dandy when Indians talk about glorious muslim invaders. And then in back side proudly claim to be kushan, huna, aryan, scytian etc :)

Islam is all about equality, one can't say the same about aryan religion can we? One just need to read my sig if anyone have doubts. But but aryans didn't came from anywhere lmao
 
.
Its all nice and dandy when Indians talk about glorious muslim invaders. And then in back side proudly claim to be kushan, huna, aryan, scytian etc :)

Islam is all about equality, one can't say the same about aryan religion can we? One just need to read my sig if anyone have doubts. But but aryans didn't came from anywhere lmao

We identify an invader as invader.
 
.
We identify an invader as invader.

You follow religion of invaders and speak aryan language. Unless you are dravidian, but even dravidian are hindus while speaking non-aryan language.
 
.
You follow religion of invaders and speak aryan language. Unless you are dravidian, but even dravidian are hindus while speaking non-aryan language.

Do you understand the difference between an invader and a settler ?
 
. .
We identify an invader as invader.
And proud on those historical building left by invaders such as Taj mahal. Tell me what you guys are smoking when you write all this BS. I have read about indus valley civilisation and gandhara in pak studies books and history books also teach us about pre-islamic heritage of this region. We have many such sites preserved in Pakistan in different museums. Its not our leaders but you idiots who tell us that we were landed on this region with entrance of Muhammad bin qasim in sindh and had no prior exitence or identity. Obviously after conversion to islam the first loyalty of Muslim is with islam and others Muslims
 
Last edited:
.
And proud on those historical building left by invaders such as Taj mahal. Tell me what you guys are smoking when you write all this BS. I have read about indus valley civilisation and gandhara in pak studies books and history books also teach us about pre-islamic heritage of this region. We have many such sites preserved in Pakistan in different museums. Its not our leaders but you idiots who tell us that we were landed on this region with entrance of Muhammad bin qasim in sindh and had no prior exitence or identity. Obviously after conversion to islam the first loyalty of Muslim is with islam and others Muslims

Shahjahan, an Indian emperor from an Indian dynasty built the Tajmahal, not someone who wanted to plunder the wealth and then carry it back to somewhere else. If you want to learn history, be unbiased.

You mistake me for a cheap troll, know the context and then talk. My point is, one should be true to his heritage and accept it the way it is. One cannot pretend to be an Arab during the day and a Sindhi or Punjabi during the night.

Islam forbids making a mockery or fun of other religions.
It will hurt the followers and then they will spur hatred against our religion.

Islam may forbid it, but many people here in this forum do, almost all of them Pakistanis. That's just plain and simple wrong and shows the religious intolerance.
 
.
Nice kid you got 100 out of 100 in Pakistan studies :D
No kiddo they dont teach this in Pak studies, wish they could teach it, instead of using religion for everything, these regions indus valley civilization, ghandhara and mehrghar have always been independent kingdoms from what u call today's india , do read the book Indus sauga and making of Pakistan while Pak studies only focuses on Mhd bin Qasim invasion and central asian empires after that not the ancient five regions, acronym for which is Pakistan, so my friend you are mistaken !!!
 
.
Mahabaharat = Ancient Game of Thrones. Its a work of fiction, not an authentic historic document.

Any proof to back it up, one-line wonder?

In the same way, can we also start questioning the authenticity of Islamic scriptures and equate them to some computer game?

@WebMaster
 
.
This line shows your limited knowledge about Sindhu-Saraswati civilisation.
And why is it that you call it Indus, which is a name coined by foreigners???
And just in case you didn't know, there were civilised ppl as far as Deccan during the mature Harappan period.
Do you have any knowledge about the SSC cities?? Or how they were built???
Any knowledge of PGW??? (painted grey ware)


Do you want me to cherry pick something from your religious text??
Don't push me to the wall.
@Irfan Baloch @waz @Emmie
This guy has been constantly misquoting hymns from Hindu religious texts.

Just a simple sketch on a piece of paper is enough to get these insecure bunch huffing & puffing and blowing up themselves and people around them. But they can happily indulge in insulting all other religions all day long!

Bunch of hypocrites!

@WebMaster since when is insulting religions (more specifically Hinduism) allowed on this form?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom