bangladesh , nepal , afghanistan ?This is a Indian barking dog media channel.
There is no permanent friend and enemy, there are only interest that's why Nepal, Bangladesh, Iran and hopefully Afghanistan will align with China and Pakistan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bangladesh , nepal , afghanistan ?This is a Indian barking dog media channel.
There is no permanent friend and enemy, there are only interest that's why Nepal, Bangladesh, Iran and hopefully Afghanistan will align with China and Pakistan.
no way , most if the countries are seeing india from last 70 years , we are secular democracy, we have made many Muslims president of india .no propaganda can deny it.
world does not see through pakistanis lense . Indian Muslims are happy with hindus , they decided to live with their hindu brothers.
we dont take lessons from brainwashed talibans .
They sold 3 billion of gas on deferred payment plan. A business move, things are between the line.this will not be very helpful for pakistan, saudis are demanding there 3 billion dollars back , they can stop oil supply which was given on deffered payments.
Seems Pakistan FM been shuttling between Gulf states for support on Kashmir cause and now this statement reflects his extreme frustration. His statement reflect Pakistan did alot for these Arabs in past, now they back off from there commitment. Recently Pakistan build KSA missile program......Editorial
Updated 08 Aug 2020
IT is rare for high officials in Pakistan to publicly criticise ‘friendly’ and ‘brotherly’ countries over foreign policy differences. However, Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi’s recent blunt criticism of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation — in fact a thinly veiled critique of Saudi Arabia — has raised eyebrows.
Speaking to a TV channel recently, Mr Qureshi expressed his frustration with the multinational bloc of Muslim states, which is headquartered in and largely controlled by Saudi Arabia. He “respectfully” told the OIC to convene a Council of Foreign Ministers over the burning Kashmir issue, or else Pakistan would “call a meeting of the Islamic countries that are ready to stand with us on ... Kashmir”. The foreign minister added that Pakistan pulled out of December’s Kuala Lumpur Summit on a Saudi “request” but now it expected Riyadh to “show leadership on this issue”.
The fact that this reflects state policy and not just the foreign minister’s personal feelings was reiterated by the Foreign Office on Thursday. The FO spokesperson said Pakistan expected “forward movement” from the OIC on the Kashmir issue, though she also highlighted the “fraternal relations” between Islamabad and Riyadh.
It is a fact that no past government in this country has ever criticised the Saudis in this manner. The long-standing economic, political and military ties between the two countries go back decades, even though the relationship has been tilted in Riyadh’s favour. However, it appears that the Saudis’ lack of interest in resolving the Kashmir dispute has touched a raw nerve in ruling circles, and the government expects our Arab brothers to do more to help end the suffering of the India-held region.
This paper has long pointed out that the OIC has become an antiquated talk shop, which does little of substance to address the key issues of the Muslim world, though the state has always contested this view. Now it appears the ruling elite has come round to the fact that playing second fiddle to Riyadh won’t do; Pakistan must explain its priorities — “our own sensitivities” as Mr Qureshi quaintly put it— in a clear and frank fashion.
While this country has always spoken up for Palestine and Kashmir, many of our Arab friends have scrambled to improve or establish ties with India and Israel.
Perhaps the prime minister needs to explain in detail the road map that Pakistan now intends to follow. As it is, there are several geostrategic blocs in the Muslim world; the Gulf Arabs and Egypt are aligned with the US; Qatar and Turkey are charting their own course, while Iran, Syria and the Hezbollah in Lebanon form yet another axis.
Does Pakistan intend to ally with any of these formations, or does it aim to create a new bloc with like-minded states? Foreign policy goals must be clear and must ensure that Pakistan takes a moral stand, while not annoying our friends and benefactors.
this will not be very helpful for pakistan, saudis are demanding there 3 billion dollars back , they can stop oil supply which was given on deffered payments.
we dont take lessons from talibans .
pakistan should concentrate on building its economy with help of friends who were friends in need .What happens if they now align themselves more with India at the expense of Pakistan it's security and the Kashmir issue?.... Should we be forever slaves and indebted chamchays?
pakistan has already paid 1 billion $ remaining would be return upon the basis of future developments...this will not be very helpful for pakistan, saudis are demanding there 3 billion dollars back , they can stop oil supply which was given on deffered payments.
Not if MBS gets his way and coverts Saudi to the liberal pro-Zionist (officially aligned with Israel) nation he wishes to...
Pakistani will then only die for Mecca and Medina... Not the Saudi nation... To date, Pakistanis have associated Saudi Arabia and the Monarchy with those holy cities....
Not sure if they will if Saudi Arabia becomes another drunken bikini giant Dubai.
@PakFactor [just including you as you asked for]
Why should Pakistanis die for a monarchy which displays filthy and shallow way to express it's public life?! Why? I am not being ungrateful for the help the Saudis have time and again extended to Pakistan. I strongly believe they did that NOT because Pakistan can protect them but because the Saudis really see Pakistan as an honest brother friend. But that friendship has its limits too, from both sides and that has reflected in the public policies of both countries. Let me try to explain that.
pakistan should concentrate on building its economy with help of friends who were friends in need .
You, and many others here, have apparently not witnessed the fanaticism of the extremists. It is mostly because of the pro-Saudi teachings that have been used to brainwash tens of millions of seminary students over the decades......seminaries, which are heavily funded by Saudi Arabia.