Pakistan will not accept India as UNSC permanent member: Nawaz

[SrNair]

Thanks for the advice. Make up for shortage of 15,000+ Army Officers with a population of 1.2 billion first and then think of being a Soupa Paway.


Defeat to the Indian backed stooges in a progress. Look at Moaists and Assam and Manipur and Nagaland and Kashmir and ISIS growing in India..

Shortage of 15000 officers is not that big deal for us.Millions of youth are here if there is an emergency.
We need professionals as our officers.Unfortunately our professionals have a lots of job opportunities with big salaries in India itself.So our GoI also spiking up the salary package and shortage will clear within few years.

We 24x7 power supply and opportunities in here.

 

[Soulspeek]

Defeat to the Indian backed stooges in a progress. Look at Moaists and Assam and Manipur and Nagaland and Kashmir and ISIS growing in India..

The number of innocents and security personnel killed in one year by these people is equal to the number of your people killed in a week in Pakistan!

Even a blind can see which country is more secure.

 

[Misay]

Dont cry like this .Learn to live with your own limitations .Dont try to pretend that we both are equal.We wont be like that .Never will be.

Dont cry like this .Learn to live with your own limitations .Dont try to pretend that we both are equal.We wont be like that .Never will be.

Everyone is equal，This is the India ancients tell Chinese

 

[IND151]

Usual Stament

 

[kaku1]

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan made it clear to the United States on Thursday it would not accept India as a permanent member of United Nations Security Council (UNSC).

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif expressed these reservations while speaking with US President Barack Obama on the phone, the PM House said in a statement.

The prime minister said India cannot become a UNSC permanent member due to its non-compliance of all the resolutions passed by UN regarding Kashmir, added the spokesman.

The US president called Nawaz in the evening where both the leaders discussed issues of mutual interest and those related to regional stability and peace for over half-an-hour, said the statement.

The spokesman said the prime minister made it clear upon the US president that permanent slot for India at the UNSC will not be tolerated at any cost as India has not fulfilled any resolution passed by UN aimed at assuring the right of self determination for the people of Kashmir.

During his visit to India last month, Obama had lent his support to India’s bid for UN Security Council’s membership which was seen in Pakistan as contempt of democracy and human rights.

“India is by no means eligible to become a permanent member of UN,” the prime minister was quoted as saying. Nawaz also conveyed Pakistan’s desire to become a member of the Nuclear Suppliers Group.

Meanwhile, Obama informed Nawaz about his recent trip to India and also congratulated the prime minister on the success of Operation Zarb-i-Azb.

Barack Obama visited India on January 25 and became the first US president to make two official visits to India during his tenure.

During the trip Indian Premier Narendar Modi and Obama announced they had reached an agreement to provide civilian nuclear technology to India that was signed in 2008 but had been held up by US concerns over liability in the event of a nuclear accident.

During his visit to India, Obama also became the first US president to attend the spectacular military and cultural display in a sign of the nations' growing closeness.

Pakistan will not accept India as UNSC permanent member: Nawaz - Pakistan - DAWN.COM

Lol, we already knows this.

 

[Pulsar]

Who the hell is Nawaz to accept or not accept? He's a non entity in this world. There were two and a half men who attended his UN General assembly speech the other day. And one and a half were sleeping!!

 

[Alphacharlie]

Gentlemen - Let me enlighten you.

There is a Rationale Behind it -

If India becomes a Permanent Security Counsel Member then Kashmir resolution passed against "it" becomes Null.

As per UN Charter No resolution can be passed against Security Counsel Members

Whiff of this news would have made entire Generale and Nawaz sweat Tears in Blood.

So whole Kashmir Legacy comes to an end.....

 

[kaku1]

How can India become a UNSC member when it refuses to enforce UN mandate in Kashmir. What signal does this send to the world.

If India gets a permanent seat then Pakistan must declare war on India and nuke it.

Refused? Learn history bro, learn history.

I am going to give you some history lessons. By saying a truth as false, doesnt means everyone in this world going to close there eyes.

Part A of resolution

Part B of Resolution

United Nations Official Document

Now tell me who is not serious on implementing the resolution?

 

[DJ Crudept]

Hmm.... He is punching way above his weight:/

 

[kaku1]

I agree, UN charter will find its way to garbage if India becomes UN permanent member. By allowing India to become Permanent Member, entire legitimacy of UN would go also to garbage. India has no legitimacy in Kashmir either except "might is right" and India without resolving Kashmir issue would have to use its "might" as it doesn't have a right otherwise.

Yeah, you are right. Only legitimacy here is of Pak.

 

[anilindia]

Pakistan dictating US. Nawaz totally gone mad.

 

[third eye]

If India becomes a Permanent Security Counsil Member then Kashmir resolution passed against them becomes Null.

Why is that ?

 

[SrNair]

Everyone is equal，This is the India ancients tell Chinese

What is that ?
Anyway when it comes to humans you are right.But when it comes to nation that is not right.

 

[Fattyacids]

You got UNSC seat .Because our former peace deluded PM Nehru agreed for that.They also offered that seat to us .

India union didn't was even created when China got the seat in 1945. UNSC is made up of the 5 key allied power of WW2, it has never offered any permanent seat to any country. Indian media fabrication of history is astounding.

 

[Misay]

What is that ?
Anyway when it comes to humans you are right.But when it comes to nation that is not right.

You mean Unequal countries relations? Colonial times in the past! Can you tell me about India and the United Kingdom relationship at now？