What's new

Pakistan to sell 05 to 07 JF-17 Thunder Fighter Planes next year

Status
Not open for further replies.
Per unit cost of JFT as per singapore airshow reported in media was 30million dollars.
Add to this the support and weapon cost.

So the H khan figure of 40-44million dollars per JFT for PAF could be very much true and around 50million dollars for for each export variant with support and weapons package included.

For 7 JFT almost 300-350million dollars

Dude, Pakistan has no role in the weapons Package for the JFT and hence will not get any part of that revenue. Also at $ 50 million a pop, you will surpass a much superior Mig 29 SMT and the likes and will not remain competitive in the market
 
.
Per unit cost of JFT as per singapore airshow reported in media was 30million dollars.
Add to this the support and weapon cost.

So the H khan figure of 40-44million dollars per JFT for PAF could be very much true and around 50million dollars for for each export variant with support and weapons package included.

For 7 JFT almost 300-350million dollars
Then again weapons would be wholly of Chinese origin. Pakistan gets zilch. And as @karan.1970 pointed out would be pocketing only around 75million.
 
.
Dude, Pakistan has no role in the weapons Package for the JFT and hence will not get any part of that revenue. Also at $ 50 million a pop, you will surpass a much superior Mig 29 SMT and the likes and will not remain competitive in the market

Thats $50 million without weapons and support. Moreover, operating costs, ownership costs matter a lot as well. Although the HKhan Figure from PakDef is a little over the hedge.
 
.
But the IP is provided by China.. Anyway, 50% or 60% wont make much difference
Please continue to try and compare it to the MKI deal even when it has been laid bare for you that it isnt the same. But then again, arguing with you on Pakistani matters to show a positive or a religious nutjob on Islam on interpretation..there is little difference. Walls respond better.
 
.
Please continue to try and compare it to the MKI deal even when it has been laid bare for you that it isnt the same. But then again, arguing with you on Pakistani matters to show a positive or a religious nutjob on Islam on interpretation..there is little difference. Walls respond better.

Sir,atleast the Indians know which subsystem they developed for Su-30 MKI,Now please enlighte us about ones developed by Pakistan for JF 17 please.
 
. .
Sir,atleast the Indians know which subsystem they developed for Su-30 MKI,Now please enlighte us about ones developed by Pakistan for JF 17 please.

If only @Oscar would receive a penny for every time an Indian asked this question, he would probably be a millionaire. Here's a small suggestion, why don't you get off your lazy a** and do some research on this forum on what exactly PAF's contributions were in terms of Avionics.
 
.
If only @Oscar would receive a penny for every time an Indian asked this question, he would probably be a millionaire. Here's a small suggestion, why don't you get off your lazy a** and do some research on this forum on what exactly PAF's contributions were in terms of Avionics.

please give me a link for that,I have been getting that sort of replies everytime..
 
. . .
Ah as usual,give me link of some article/journal sort of stuff,not the entire thread..

Not usual, its just the fact that you are lazy and want to be spoon fed everything instead of researching on your own. If you want to truly know more about the JF17, you would read the entire thread instead of trolling over here. Look at the thread below, every possible information you need on the JF17 and Pakistan's contribution is compiled in this thread:

https://defence.pk/threads/jf-17-thunder-information-pool.71435/

Also, feel free to listen to Group Captain Khalid, a test pilot for JF17.

 
.
Please continue to try and compare it to the MKI deal even when it has been laid bare for you that it isnt the same. But then again, arguing with you on Pakistani matters to show a positive or a religious nutjob on Islam on interpretation..there is little difference. Walls respond better.
Biased much :).. ?? Did I even say MKI ? Being a little over defensive.. Are we?
 
.
Thats $50 million without weapons and support. Moreover, operating costs, ownership costs matter a lot as well. Although the HKhan Figure from PakDef is a little over the hedge.
Not too sure. I believe the fly away cost of a Mig 35 (without weps package) is close to $35-$40 million
 
.
Not usual, its just the fact that you are lazy and want to be spoon fed everything instead of researching on your own. If you want to truly know more about the JF17, you would read the entire thread instead of trolling over here. Look at the thread below, every possible information you need on the JF17 and Pakistan's contribution is compiled in this thread:

https://defence.pk/threads/jf-17-thunder-information-pool.71435/

Also, feel free to listen to Group Captain Khalid, a test pilot for JF17.


Most of the talk is about how PAF has helped design the User Interface, location of switches and screen etc. Net Net, User requirements.. Would be interesting to know if there is any component in there, the IP for which is owned by Pakistan..
 
.
Dude, Pakistan has no role in the weapons Package for the JFT and hence will not get any part of that revenue. Also at $ 50 million a pop, you will surpass a much superior Mig 29 SMT and the likes and will not remain competitive in the market

partially agree with you about the weapon package.But it will also matter what weapon package would they want.

Meanwhile Pakistan can supply

*Dumb bombs
*takbir recently developed/Co produced by GIDS similar to chinese ls-6
*ALCM with range decreased to 250km
*Runway Bomb,(forgot the name now which pakistan already has exported to azerbaijaan)
*LGB's in near future(under development courtesy ideas def expo 2002)
*A2A missile underdevelopment by NDC/AWC (courtesy again ideas def expo 2002)

And beyond 2015 Pak may also starts its own different types of a2a missiles program
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom