Pakistan to Kerry: We are worried about India

[DIRECT ACTION]

So invading Pakistan because of bengali refugee crises is kosher for India, while 2 million afghan refugee crisis due to russian invasion and we helping afghan resistance is Haram. Irony !

there was more than 10 million Bengali refuges in different indian states.. and india can't ignore the butchering of innocent civilins in bengal even after they beg for india's help. as a responsible state india 1st warn pakistani leaders to agree withe people of Epakistan. when pakistanis use military force to killing civilins. india appealed in UN against pakistan, when UN under control of USA didn't take any action india act militarily, that too after pakistan conducts an airstrike in india. so the war is started by foolish pakistani military leaders who believe in blenders. they ask for their surrendering and division of pakistan. we never do any terrorism like suiside bombing in civilins places. don't you know that former pakistani military personals were also in the mukthi bhahini. even commandos(bengalies) form your SSGN was part of mukthibhahini.

 

[Bratva]

there was more than 10 million Bengali refuges in different indian states.. and india can't ignore the butchering of innocent civilins in bengal even after they beg for india's help. as a responsible state india 1st warn pakistani leaders to agree withe people of Epakistan. when pakistanis use military force to killing civilins. india appealed in UN against pakistan, when UN under control of USA didn't take any action india act militarily, that too after pakistan conducts an airstrike in india. so the war is started by foolish pakistani military leaders who believe in blenders. they ask for their surrendering and division of pakistan. we never do any terrorism like suiside bombing in civilins places. don't you know that former pakistani military personals were also in the mukthi bhahini. even commandos(bengalies) form your SSGN was part of mukthibhahini.

And how many civilians were butchered by IA in kashmir ?

 

[ares]

So invading Pakistan because of bengali refugee crises is kosher for India, while 2 million afghan refugee crisis due to russian invasion and we helping afghan resistance is Haram. Irony !

Problem wasn't, what you did during Russian invasion of Afghanistan, rather what happened after Russians withdrew.

India gave refuge to ten million East Pakistani refugees, who had escaped Pakistani genocide in East Pakistan.
Some of these refugees who wanted to fight Pakistani army, were given weapons and training and Mukiti Bahini was created.

But as soon Bangladesh became independent Mukiti Bahini was disbanded, it had a short life span of seven months.

Where as in Pakistan, after Russians withdrew, instead of disbanding the Mujahideen, Pakistan started supporting a particular a group of Mujahideen of certain ethnicity.

Pakistan helped Taliban seize power in Afghanistan, so that Afghanistan can function as Pakistan's client state for 'strategic depth'.

At the same time, it started transferring some of these jihadis to Kashmir, to fight against India...and created similar terror infrastructure in Punjab and P.Ok.

Pakistan turned a blind eye to terrorist outfits being hosted Taliban regime, and when one of these terror outfits, went and did 9/11 in US..ground must have literally slipped from under Musharraf's feet.

This is when Pakistan was forced to take a U turn and was forced to fight against groups, which until the day before, you were support.

Your errors started compounding from the day Pakistan refused to disband the mujahideens after Russian withdrawal and came full circle when you had to take a 'U' turn against them in WoT.

 

[SarthakGanguly]

Do you really think people here really care about what Mukti Bahini was or what it fought for?

Sorry Shaktiman.

Yeah, you are actually right. It was a waste, but hey, some exercise for my fingers.

 

[karan.1970]

Problem wasn't, what you did during Russian invasion of Afghanistan, rather what happened after Russians withdrew.

India gave refuge to ten million East Pakistani refugees, who had escaped Pakistani genocide in East Pakistan.
Some of these refugees who wanted to fight Pakistani army, were given weapons and training and Mukiti Bahini was created.

But as soon Bangladesh became independent Mukiti Bahini was disbanded, it had a short life span of seven months.

Where as in Pakistan, after Russians withdrew, instead of disbanding the Mujahideen, Pakistan started supporting a particular a group of Mujahideen of certain ethnicity.

Pakistan helped Taliban seize power in Afghanistan, so that Afghanistan can function as Pakistan's client state for 'strategic depth'.

At the same time, it started transferring some of these jihadis to Kashmir, to fight against India...and created similar terror infrastructure in Punjab and P.Ok.

Pakistan turned a blind eye to terrorist outfits being hosted Taliban regime, and when one of these terror outfits, went and did 9/11 in US..ground must have literally slipped from under Musharraf's feet.

This is when Pakistan was forced to take a U turn and was forced to fight against groups, which until the day before, you were support.

Your errors started compounding from the day Pakistan refused to disband the mujahideens after Russian withdrawal and came full circle when you had to take a 'U' turn against them in WoT.

Too much of logic and bitter truth for most Pakistanis to accept

 

[SarthakGanguly]

And how many civilians were butchered by IA in kashmir ?

As many as your state sent. More or less.

 

[krishnathealien]

Lol internet warrior.
Proofs had been given that all matters.
Google also tells so much about RAW as well but Google is not a piece of evidence, may be in india who knows.

Is Google available in your country ?

 

[Bratva]

As many as your state sent. More or less.

2010 Kashmiri protests were also done under the patonage of Hafiz Saeed I guess

Problem wasn't, what you did during Russian invasion of Afghanistan, rather what happened after Russians withdrew.

India gave refuge to ten million East Pakistani refugees, who had escaped Pakistani genocide in East Pakistan.
Some of these refugees who wanted to fight Pakistani army, were given weapons and training and Mukiti Bahini was created.

But as soon Bangladesh became independent Mukiti Bahini was disbanded, it had a short life span of seven months.

Where as in Pakistan, after Russians withdrew, instead of disbanding the Mujahideen, Pakistan started supporting a particular a group of Mujahideen of certain ethnicity.

Pakistan helped Taliban seize power in Afghanistan, so that Afghanistan can function as Pakistan's client state for 'strategic depth'.

At the same time, it started transferring some of these jihadis to Kashmir, to fight against India...and created similar terror infrastructure in Punjab and P.Ok.

Pakistan turned a blind eye to terrorist outfits being hosted Taliban regime, and when one of these terror outfits, went and did 9/11 in US..ground must have literally slipped from under Musharraf's feet.

This is when Pakistan was forced to take a U turn and was forced to fight against groups, which until the day before, you were support.

Your errors started compounding from the day Pakistan refused to disband the mujahideens after Russian withdrawal and came full circle when you had to take a 'U' turn against them in WoT.

Now compare with what you did in Srilanka. Strategic depth is a bytch, aint it

After russia left, civil war in afghanistan pushed more refuges in Pakistan. Pakistan had to stabilize the situation. Indians can't seem to think more than Pakistan wanted to make Afghanistan a client state. WHat's the advantage of making afghanistan a client state ? Unless they are mineral rich country ! grow up

Did Bangladesh went in to civil war after 71? No so comparing After war effects with Mukti bahini is totally wrong.

 

[karan.1970]

2010 Kashmiri protests were also done under the patonage of Hafiz Saeed I guess

And countless others like him that live in terrorist safe havens in Pakistan

 

[Bratva]

Every country resorts to things. There is no real high moral ground to reach, nor is there any benefit to it. Point is where do you draw the line? The Mukti Bahini (in contrast to the rabidly sectarian Taliban) was a highly secular force led by men who had good education, were liberals back in the day and patriots. Surely there were a few goons, a large organization by its very nature will attract some, but even they did not blow up Pakistani officer's wives shopping in Dhaka or did not kidnap Army kids studying in the convent schools who later sought refuge in the Intercontinental hotel.

The targets were specifically chosen from among Pakistani soldiers and their civilian militia (Al Badr/Al Nasr?). It was through in through out a military force, albeit guerilla in nature. The Taliban or the 'strategic assets' nurtured by Pakistan were far more than that.

I guess you haven't read Blood and tears. What mukti bahini did with women and children not to mention the riots in march 1971 and dozens of bihari colonies ravaged, house burnt, women raped lootings on large scale . Nice fake portrayal of Mukti bahini as a disciplined force

And countless others like him that live in terrorist safe havens in Pakistan

So anything other than hearsay which can be proven infront of Law ?

 

[ares]

Now compare with what you did in Srilanka. Strategic depth is a bytch, aint it

After russia left, civil war in afghanistan pushed more refuges in Pakistan. Pakistan had to stabilize the situation. Indians can't seem to think more than Pakistan wanted to make Afghanistan a client state.

1.Indira Gandhi initially helped LTTE, Her son when came to power, realized the error of her ways and sent IPKF to bring LTTE under control and prevent Srilankan army from massacring Tamil Civilians.

Rajiv Gandhi lost his life due to his neutral approach to Sri Lankan civil war.

After Rajiv Gandhi's assassination, India withdrew from Sri Lankan affairs completely, hence fallout on India was minimal.

2. Had Pakistan wanted to just stabilize Afghanistan, it would helped install a democratic government, representing all Afghans ethnicities(as it has been done now), rather it went ahead and installed a Islamo-Fascist regime, which had deep sympathies for Islamic terrorist groups...but were ethnically linked to Pakistanis. As it wanted continued supply of foot soldiers for its Jihad on the Eastern front.

And how many civilians were butchered by IA in kashmir ?

Within a short period of seven months, Ten million East Pakistani refugees came to India, as a result of Pakistani army massacres in Bangladesh.

In last 25 yrs, how many Kashmiri refugees have made their way to Pakistan, as result "Indian army butchery" there ?

Rather the only Kashmiri refugees who have fled Kashmir are two hundred and fifty thousand Kashmir Pandits and they sought refuge in Delhi and not Pakistan.

 

[Amaa'n]

Yep Pakistan surely do have an evidence, and unlike your blabbering & whining - to which US doesn't pays a heed, some people do see it as concrete enough -
A part of the evidence was tabled to Mr.Ashraf Ghani during the meeting with ISAF Commander and our COAS -
but unlike India, Pakistan is acting maturely and not getting down the childish rhetoric.
India's financial support to TTP and Anti Pakistan elements is no more a secret among. Black funds are transfered to NDS / Afghan Intel, that helps TTP to sustain its growth & provides them with Weapons from Black market -Pakistani leadership now. And we have shown restraint, just because we do not want to escalate the situation that could bring instability in the region - If Pakistan was such a terror state then care to elaborate why was it not declared a Terror state during Kerry's recent visit?

it doesn't matter who they are.. my question is did they have any proof that india is supporting terrorists in pakistan??
indian blames pakistan only after having proof... investigation on every terror attack by Islamic terrorists in india ends in ISI... even 26/11 there is a strong proof of pakistani involvement. did pakistan have any proof like that?? Musharraf is a lair.. is never tell the truth.

even having a strong evidence in ISI's involvement pakistan is keep denying their role in 26/11.. if pakistan have any proof against indian then they have already send to other countries to isolate india. sartaj aziz is blaming india only to counter indian allegation that pakistan is sponsoring terrorism in india.

 

[Kompromat]

India has drifted into fascism, its only apt to keep its hubristic policies in check by engaging the international powers.

 

[Amaa'n]

and this post of yours and the pics you have shared with us tells us how much of Keyboard warrior you are, unaware of ground situation - there are the weapons that were left behind by the locals in the area - days of the rag tag talibans are long gone, these guys operate with sophisticated weapons and equipment - in few of the terrorist attacks, some NVG, Sat phones,GP30 40mm gl were recovered, so what makes you think that those who have access to such weaponery will be using these decade old junk???
I suggest its time for you go back and read a little more on War on Terror in Pakistan and terror groupds operating out of pakistan ---

i don't find any genuine report on indian involvement in Baluchistan in google
your army is conducting a war in Baluchistan.. so why don't they get a single evidence against india?? why don't they say that they have evidence against indian involvement in unrest in Baluchistan?? why don't pakistani officials specify about what kind of support india is providing to BLA, like if india is providing training, weapons, financial or moral support?? what kind of support is actually india giving to BLA??
all the weapons pak army recovered from BLA is WW2 era weapons. during 71 war india was able to provide assult rifles to mukthi bhahinis then why there is only some outdated small arms with BLA if we are supporting them??

these are the weapons your army recovered from the terrorists who you clam india is supporting... look at those weapons, those weapons itself says that those terrorists don't even get any support from anyone. leave alone india, they don't have any support even not from Afghan Taliban or al qaeda. pakistan having a gun culture.. even your politicians have AK47(if you want i will post video of a politician saying that he only trust his AK).


these weapons are recovered from a terrorist group in the country like pakistan were there is large market for illilag guns... manufacturing locally

above details are enough to understand that those terrorists in pakistan don't have any support from outside, and you don't need to a rocket scientists to understand that those blame game played by your officials is only to gain public support for the army. your officials don't have any evidence against india. if they had then they would jumped over the issue and run to UN, US, arab country to cry and beg for more funds. and openly ask support for your so called terrorist jihad against india.

 

[acid rain]

And how many civilians were butchered by IA in kashmir ?

At least we don't use artillery, tanks, fighter jets, bombers and drones on our citizens. HOw about You tell me how many civilians have been killed in fata, baluchistan by PA.?