i was giving an example on how india does NOT have acces to tender info in the f35 to be specific.
Yes, this is originally my argument. Since the F-35 did not participate in the Indian tender, we don't know enough about it beyond whatever presentations LM has been giving since years. But we have all the necessary information for all other aircraft.
We have all the information about the Typhoon, red line limits, current tech, modernized tech etc. We used all that information to slaughter it during exercises. We have much more information about the Su-35 than we do about the Typhoon.
oh to the indian mig is better because it has a indian jammer as opposed to a russain one ? how do you know the export package is "basic"
It is basic because there's nothing special they have made for export yet.
yes the su-25 was based of the su27 but when its development was halted in the 90's its design then went on to future non canard su-30 models. when its program resumed future break throughs from the su30 went on to the su35. it was seen as going backwards from working from the su-27 instead of the su-30
You said the Su-35 lost canards, I said that's wrong. The end.
yes, india paid for its development but it did not extend to the point that india has a say in who can buy the canard variant.
The MKI is sold only to countries India wants to sell it to. The end.
hypothetically if they did buy it dont you think they would go for a chinese aesa instead of a russain pesa?
They can, but the Russians won't allow it. That would require giving away secrets which they won't.
irrelevant points its the truth kiddo, not my fault you cant take it. yeas malaysia and algeria are not pakistan well done, but Malaysia in particular are very close to pakistan dont you think intensive training. Algeria likes to be neutral and not make enemies
Malaysia is not close to Pakistan militarily. India is actually considering tri-services exercises with them, we don't do that with the US or anybody else. We even have a Flanker forum with them, so IAF and RMAF can exchange ideas without opsec issues. Malaysia and India are already strategic partners.
We ultimately plan to make a NATO type system with some ASEAN countries. Especially Malaysia and Singapore. For example, the Singapore air force uses Indian bases to practice high end tactics because they don't have the airspace for that.
rubbish you said j-10 not j-20
J-20 was a typo, I was referring to the J-10, my bad.
The statement should say-
Because when I gave PAF the option of the
J-10, you said the J-10 has engine problems.
You ridiculed the J-10, I returned the favour.
