Pakistan rejects NATO 'regrets' and 'Self Defence' Claims

[StandForInsaf]

The army can do nothing- What they are capable of doing- they have done that already- Blocked the supplies for few weeks-
Thats the sorry state we are in- dont expect any thing else-

I see , what are your recommendations for them?

The decision is of government to make what to do , don't expect them to make decision for you , blame your government for that. They cannot attack or bomb target or use strategic tech-tics without government permission.

 

[VCheng]

Northern Alliance is another likely suspect here
Americans might have been fooled into attacking the post, also note that the Afhgan army is also quoting itself as a source of alleged Pakistani post firing which led to the air strike.

The Afghan troops (mainly NA dominated officers and footmen) are the ones that requested the air strike and might have played the Americans into attacking Pakistanis. The Northern Alliance has never made its anti _Pakistan approach a secret and the feeling is shared. Both Pakistan and Northern alliance don’t trust each other and have confronted each other directly and indirectly on ground and through diplomacy.

The other likely suspects the be the Russians. Maybe not in this particular incident but through the world of espionage, confusion, misinformation and covert operations Why? Well its payback time for what Pakistan and USA did to them back in the 80s. it might seem far fetched and I agree specially in this incident but in the overall Afghan Pakistan crises the Russians might be playing their own game.

One of the many reasons I keep saying let us please wait for the full investigation to be completed.

 

[The HBS Guy]

It is getting clear now-

No it's not. The question of 'why' still remains unanswered.

 

[StandForInsaf]

?BBC Urdu? - ????? ?????? - ?’????? ????? ????? ?????? ???‘?

He is clearly telling that we don't have orders to hunt down NATO/US entities , this is because Pakistan is non NATO ally to US and it is the government policy.
Army has only to implement policy if government changes it army will implement it.

 

[JonAsad]

No it's not. The question of 'why' still remains unanswered.

The "why" should be obvious-

" Dont interfere in what we are doing inside your territory without your permission- Sovereignty can kiss a55- "

reminiscent:
Obama Vows To Hunt Terrorists In Pakistan

---------- Post added at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:25 PM ----------

I see , what are your recommendations for them?

The decision is of government to make what to do , don't expect them to make decision for you , blame your government for that. They cannot attack or bomb target or use strategic tech-tics without government permission.

Yes every thing is under government control- thats why zardari sent a letter to mullen- asking him to save his a55 from generals-

Who is in control of Pakistan Army- The whole world knows it-

Army can over throw the government without its permission- but cannot use its assets to defend its sovereignty without its permission- Wah- who you trying to fool?-

 

[StandForInsaf]

The "why" should be obvious-

" Dont interfere in what we are doing inside your territory without your permission- Sovereignty can kiss a55- "

---------- Post added at 03:25 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:25 PM ----------



Yes every thing is under government control- thats why zardari sent a letter to mullen- asking him to save his a55 from generals-

Who is in control of Pakistan Army- The whole world knows it-

Army can over throw the government without its permission- but cannot use its assets to defend its sovereignty without its permission- Wah- who you trying to fool?-

You are again mixing things, fair investigation of this letter has yet to be done , you can keep your "FACTS" no one is making fool of anyone.

 

[Cheetah786]

Okay ..fine.. NATO apologized now what?..they did the same last time..you cant arm twist USA coz you dont have it.
now you people are finding solace in these silly statements of apology and rejection..lol..does it guarantee that they wont fire another bullet down the line a year after...PAK as a nation need to brainstorm to come out from this mess.

"This will come back at us, and at a time and a place of their [the ISI's] choosing," One Isaf source voiced concern that the Pakistani intelligence agency, the ISI,

Nato braces for reprisals after deadly air strike on Pakistan border post | World news | The Guardian

Its time for Pakistan to carry out strategic attacks on Afghan military positions.

 

[ashokdeiva]

I strongly feel bad for this incident a delibrate mistake done by the NATO on pakistani soldiers.
the NATO has the best of the intel and how come they lanch an attack on the Army post of another nation, this is like making fun of another country.
A through investigation must be made and the commanding officer of the NATO who is responsible for this mess has to be punished to the satisfaction of the Pakistani General Public.

 

[Areesh]

One of the many reasons I keep saying let us please wait for the full investigation to be completed.

Well most probably the investigation would tell us that NATO soldiers got high with their late night "drinks" and as a result Pakistani soldiers got killed in this incident. So back to stupid WOT.

 

[VCheng]

.............PA have refuted all lies.

Refuting is quite another thing; I am referring to the proper investigation report by the PA.

 

[VCheng]

Well most probably the investigation would tell us that NATO soldiers got high with their late night "drinks" and as a result Pakistani soldiers got killed in this incident. So back to stupid WOT.

Mere conjecture, which is quite useless at this stage.

 

[Areesh]

Mere conjecture, which is quite useless at this stage.

Well that's what is going to happen. The charsi fauji of NATO or American military got overdosed and hence this incident. Mark my words.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

Refuting is quite another thing; I am referring to the proper investigation report by the PA.

Mere conjecture, which is quite useless at this stage.

The DG ISPR has provided the 'established facts' from the Pakistani side in his official statements.

1. Location of the posts communicated to ISAF several times
2. No fire from Pakistani post - most soldiers were asleep - corroborated by UK media interviews of soldiers wounded in the attack.
3. Pakistan not contacted regarding any NATO concerns about 'taking fire' from Pakistani positions, despite channels specifically created for this purpose.
4. NATO continued attacking Pakistani positions for over an hour after Pakistan contacted NATO through established lines of communication to halt attacks.
5. No NATO reports of casualties from alleged 'fire from Pakistani posts', nor any evidence supporting claims of 'fire from Pakistani posts'.

 

[soul hacker]

yar mera dil to us waqat tak kjush nahi hoga jab tak inke TROOPS na mare

---------- Post added at 09:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:38 PM ----------

yar mera dil to us waqat tak khush nahi hoga jab tak inke TROOPS na mare

 

[TOPGUN]

Kill first then say sorry afterwards very nice unreal...