Colluding with a foreign intel agency is definitely a crime.
You ought to be more clear than that. Crime occurs when one colludes with an enemy, harbors the intent to harm the nation, and then acts on it as well. Mere collusion/planning is not a crime. But given the precarious situation of Pakistan in these times, it is agreeable to use preventive actions and create an example of out of those who may be planning to harm the nation.
Yet, Dr. Afridi's case is unique, because even the Pakistani Army has neither fully confirmed, nor completely denied its involvement in helping the US undertake the raid. If it is true that the PA were privy to the situation and the oncoming raid, then Afridi should be treated as just another piece in the unified effort by two allies.
How is this crime, or even treason that many are calling it? It wasn't termed a treasonous act even in the very court that sentenced him.
By his own admission, he did not know that his actions had anything to do with capturing OBL. All he was doing was helping the CIA for money without knowing the ulterior motives. That is treason.
If his aiding the CIA (without the knowledge of the ISI, as is understood by the general public) was the main crime, then why was the charge of treason not applied on the same ground?
The fact is, Shakeel Afridi was sentenced to 33 years in prison for aiding a militant organization, and not for helping the CIA locate Osama.
And interestingly, the same militant organization (Lashkar-e-Islam) members that are accused of using Afridi, have said that they would kill him at the slightest opportunity.
@
Developereo & @
nuclearpak, you both need to ponder over this:
Why is it that the general population of Pakistan is calling Afridi a traitor for helping find Osama bin Laden, when even the court of law has exonerated him of any such charges that would involve the CIA/Americans?
Does it not clearly show that the people would rather have Dr. Afridi help the militant organizations (such as Lashkar-e-Islam), than help find and kill the most dreaded terrorist whose ideologies have been most harmful to Pakistan, even more than it did other nations?
Do you both not think that such ignorance laden hatred (esp when it is contrary to the court's view) of the general public showcases their love for Osama more than their hatred for the Americans?
Few of you would want to believe this, but fact is, the raid was actually good for Pakistan.