What's new

Pakistan on the verge of total collapse?

Pakistani People should prepare for war to reclaim country from Army Thugs
my question for this has always been: “and then replace with what”

Anything that it will be replaced with will be bloodily authoritarian, revolution always spawns these types of governments.
Chances are you'll be left with something just as bad, if not worse.
There is still a colossal power vacuum to fill in regards to the army and establishment.
 
. .
How bad it can be, really?
Are we talking about civil war, or?
 
.
Turkish people are not like Pakistani people , they are proud and have integrity.

The truth about Pakistanis is that we don't seem to understand any thing except the stick... and chachoo whisky knows it .
Read Turkish history before 2003. One of their PM was hanged, countless military coups, leaders jailed, Erbakhan was a great leader of Turkey and his government was toppled alot of times, he was jailed, had to spend the last days of his life in prison even though AKP was in power for 8 years.

necmettinerbakan.jpg
 
. . .
ead Turkish history before 2003. One of their PM was hanged, countless military coups, leaders jailed, Erbakhan was a great leader of Turkey and his government was toppled alot of times, he was jailed, had to spend the last days of his life in prison even though AKP was in power for 8 years.

and before that they were the Ottamans... a great empire..

we were never that.
 
.
Islamic ideal system is democracy, there is verse in Quran saying this explicitly. All first four Chalipt is elected through consultation where the first one, Abu Bakar, is through voting. All four Chalips are not blood related which shows Islam is an advanced and modern system.


View attachment 944212

You can learn about the process of election after the death of Prophet Muhammad from the Muhammad Haikal written book, famous Egyptian Historian. There were debate and votes, very very modern system. Two leaders from Anshar (biggest in population) and Quraish (minority) were in competition. The result showing that Quraish winning shows the election is based on rational rather than majority vs minority power composition as like Today democracy in modern world.

Translated copy in Indonesian language.

View attachment 944211
Madina Islamic state was model state for the world. Today voting is not really majority v minority because if 10 candidates are standing, they all get similar amounts of votes but the one ahead will win, he/she might only receive 11% of the vote and 89% have rejected them because they voted for a different candidate.
 
. .
and before that they were the Ottamans... a great empire..

we were never that.
Pakistan should have been the continues of the Mughal and Delhi empires but we never bother to learn about our history. Look at India, 24 7 talking about mother India, they know exactly their aim.
 
.
Pakistanis have always known that the army controlled everything behind the scenes and never had a problem with it.

They see (or did see) the army as one of the most loyal institutions in Pakistan so didn't mind.

The real reason why people in Pakistan are mad is not because of "democracy is destroyed" or "facism" - but because of losing trust in an institution that has control over everything.

(Mind you, Islam is inherently a facist and anti-democratic religion so you literally look foolish complaining about these two)

The army's job is to restore this trust and to convince them that the army is still looking out for their greater interests. But their communication is shit - and honestly there is a huge question mark on how competent they really are because Pakistan is so poorly managed in every area.

Islam is not facist !
 
.
Madina Islamic state was model state for the world. Today voting is not really majority v minority because if 10 candidates are standing, they all get similar amounts of votes but the one ahead will win, he/she might only receive 11% of the vote and 89% have rejected them because they voted for a different candidate.

Yup, unfortunately the system is destroyed after Ali and Aisyah fought using swords (not through consultation system (non violence means) that is put in Quran by Allah SWT), and there come Muawiyah that was Syria Governor who benefitting from this Ali vs Aisyah rivalry and destroyed Muslim first democratic system in 7 Century, far ahead of many great civilizations, only Greek that can be compared to.

We need to get the lesson from it, but we see similar situation in Today Muslim world like in Yemen, Syria, Egypt, Tunisia, Somalia, Sudan, and now Niger....

Lebanon has learned their mistake and now they are a democratic nation.

----------------------

Some modern democracy like Indonesia, USA, and France pick only the majority as President despite USA is some how problematic with their electoral base system originated from their past history.

In Indonesia, Presidential election will be conducted in two phase with only two most popular candidates if no majority votes taken in the first election.

For the Parliamentary system, yep the party who get the most votes has the first right to form a coalition to form a government. Some Presidential system like in Philippine also use this system.

---------------------
 
Last edited:
.
Non Muslim and less knowledgeable Muslim see Islam through the lense of Iran, Saudi, and Taliban instead of going directly to the sources which is Quran, Hadith, and how prophet Muhammad manage the first Muslim society.
 
.
Islam is not facist !
How is it not facist? By the way I'm not using this term as an insult, I see nothing wrong with it

Islam commands you to live your life in a very specific manner, and it has very very harsh punishments if you break these laws.

There isn't any room for different political stances or parties because it only allows Islamic thought to thrive.

Islamic ideal system is democracy, there is verse in Quran saying this explicitly. All first four Chalipt is elected through consultation where the first one, Abu Bakar, is through voting. All four Chalips are not blood related which shows Islam is an advanced and modern system.


View attachment 944212

You can learn about the process of election after the death of Prophet Muhammad from the Muhammad Haikal written book, famous Egyptian Historian. There were debate and votes, very very modern system. Two leaders from Anshar (biggest in population) and Quraish (minority) were in competition. The result showing that Quraish winning shows the election is based on rational rather than majority vs minority power composition as like Today democracy in modern world.

Translated copy in Indonesian language.

View attachment 944211
This system to me sounds less like western democracy and more similar (but not identical) to how CCP works.

Anyway I want to be clear that my comment wasn't meant to be insulting as one person took it
 
.
How is it not facist? By the way I'm not using this term as an insult, I see nothing wrong with it

Islam commands you to live your life in a very specific manner, and it has very very harsh punishments if you break these laws.

What specific manner ? Once again dont see Islam in the lense of Iranian, Taliban government.

---------------------------------------------------

Only when you killed other person, stealing, and doing Zinah (where Islam allow sex to happen between husband and wife) there you will face hard punishment which very fine IMO.

-------------------------------------------------

Islam is pretty liberal religion and not sticky and hard like being portrayed by Taliban and the likes

1691404051541.png

1691404102832.png


There isn't any room for different political stances or parties because it only allows Islamic thought to thrive.

1691404322928.png

1691405321485.png
 
Last edited:
.
Back
Top Bottom