What's new

Pakistan nuclear arsenal tops 100: report

You see- the true self is coming out- thats why i will reiterate again- we need more nukes- :tup:

No..and a big NO....You need a good conventional deterrence and no number of nukes can change that need...In fact even that need is outdated in today's world...In today's world the war is called economic war....Anyways it will take lot of time before you will realize that so let's talk about your favorite topic..Nukes..

Look the moment you had your first nuke the same day chance of a nuclear war was over....The problem is the so-called limited war under the nuclear umbrella...It is this what is giving your COAS some sleepless nights...NASR and other developments are being done just to counter this and no matter how many times you say we will nuke India the truth of the matter is we all know that PA is not bunch of people on suicide mission......So let me repeat again - You have enough nukes to keep India at bay from taking over your country...A false fear that has been fed to you your entire life which makes you so blind that you can't even ask a basic question...when was the last time India tried to take over Pak....
 
.
Actually you should feel sorry for your self- you size advantage is going down the drain-
You guys are a joke! Having 100 or 10000 nukes would not make a quantum jump in destruction. Just one 20kt nuke per city is enough to wipe out the entire population.

After a nuke war, neither you nor I would be there to see the results. We all would have turned to ash. So your argument is specious.

I fail to understand why most Pakistani friends refuse to understand that Pakistan would NOT escape destruction and they'll be wiped off the map too? Don't you guys understand that India has nukes too? Or don't you know? It doesn't seem so considering that Pakistanis are doing the Bhangra as though the destruction of India is a cinch while for Pakistan it would be business as usual after the nuke war! Jeeeez! :toast_sign:
 
.
Pakistan nuclear arsenal tops 100: report

Pakistan has doubled its nuclear weapons stockpile over the past several years, increasing its arsenal to more than 100 deployed weapons, The Washington Post reported late Sunday.

Citing US non-government analysts, the newspaper said that only four years ago, the Pakistani nuclear arsenal was estimated at 30 to 60 weapons.

"They have been expanding pretty rapidly," the report quoted David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security, as saying.

Based on recently accelerated production of plutonium and highly enriched uranium, Islamabad may now have an arsenal of up to 110 weapons, Albright said.

As a result, Pakistan has now edged ahead of India, its nuclear-armed rival, The Post noted. India is estimated to have 60 to 100 weapons.

It will be better if you will check related thread created in past before making new thread, this is not new information and not important because Pakistan is proved atomic power so now there is no charm left to count 100 or 1000 nukes. Go ahead for another useful topic.
 
.
Obviously we need more nukes to wipe india off the map- So good to hear that we are going in right direction--

ohh really, so you dont think we already have enough to erase you off the map as well ? dude grow up from this war mentality if you want to progress. Seriously get over the dreams of destroying India, you have been trying that for the past 50 years and the only thing that has happened is Pakistan's inclusion in the 10 most dangerous countries in the world. India has deep second and third strike capability, you might not be able to wipe out 1.2 Billion India but we will sure wipe out 187 Million Pakistanis and the terror groups that live happily in Pakistan under the nuclear shadow.
 
.
Dude this is 1000 year old news!!
We must have around 115 now :P

I guess ure did typo mistake ..it is I guess 1115......not 115......everybody shold take note of it...cuz after 1000yearz and making at least one nuke per year it calculates to 110 +1 nuke X 1000 years + 5 surplus equals = 1115 nukes in total ....umm....:woot:
 
.
Great news...pakistan will need atleast 1000 nukes to hit India and Israel and then aim to beat Russia :cheers:
 
.
No..and a big NO....You need a good conventional deterrence and no number of nukes can change that need...In fact even that need is outdated in today's world...In today's world the war is called economic war....Anyways it will take lot of time before you will realize that so let's talk about your favorite topic..Nukes..

Look the moment you had your first nuke the same day chance of a nuclear war was over....The problem is the so-called limited war under the nuclear umbrella...It is this what is giving your COAS some sleepless nights...NASR and other developments are being done just to counter this and no matter how many times you say we will nuke India the truth of the matter is we all know that PA is not bunch of people on suicide mission......So let me repeat again - You have enough nukes to keep India at bay from taking over your country...A false fear that has been fed to you your entire life which makes you so blind that you can't even ask a basic question...when was the last time India tried to take over Pak....
Man We are having fun in this thread by making more nukes.....:)
U know what ...we wanna make so many Nukes so that .....cuz every Pakistani wanna sleep with at least one nuke under his bed/pillow....:what:
 
.
Great news...pakistan will need atleast 1000 nukes to hit India and Israel and then aim to beat Russia :cheers:

No I guess U mistaken here again ...we just wanna nuke India at least 1000 times....and wanna see how it looks like after 1000 nukes hit....is gonna be a new experiment in the Nuklear world....???....isn't it....???.......:azn:
 
.
No I guess U mistaken here again ...we just wanna nuke India at least 1000 times....and wanna see how it looks like after 1000 nukes hit....is gonna be a new experiment in the Nuklear world....???....isn't it....???.......:azn:
Yes...you a can dream and you have every right and what more...it's free and you dont require any aid for that. :P
 
.
What a stupid, hare brained thread! This should be shoved into a new forum titled, "Jokes, Puns and Outlandish Humour'! Treating nuclear war as a joke is plain dumb and a manifestation of intellectual disability.
 
. .
You didnt get my point . It comes later what these nukes are "intended" for ..

First did you analyze whether it is possible to at all use even a handful of them ?

No offense , just academically --- how many secure storage areas do you reasonably think Pakistan has ? considering your limited geographical area. Do you realistically think these sites , the sites of your missiles , your nuke complexes are not being monitored by Indian Military Intel ?

There are doubts about Pakistan's capability to reach all of India in the first place ...but lets say for assumptions sake they can .

Do you think they can take out more than a handful of our military nuke assets ???

Cities and civilian assets are not exactly relevant ....

We simply dont care what these nukes are 'intended for', we even dont care how many of these we will be able to use. One thing for which india is always afraid of is the quality of nukes, even if we use 5% of these, that would be sufficient for india. The said fear was even revealed in wikileaks.

Now talking about geographical area, even France is the third largest nuke holding country in the world, its area is less than Pakistan. We have no doubts that indian military must be having complete monitoring of our nukes / sites. What do you think our mil intel is sleeping?

What a childish thinking about taking nukes out of each other. :lol: :lol:
 
. .
We simply dont care what these nukes are 'intended for', we even dont care how many of these we will be able to use. One thing for which india is always afraid of is the quality of nukes, even if we use 5% of these, that would be sufficient for india. The said fear was even revealed in wikileaks.

Now talking about geographical area, even France is the third largest nuke holding country in the world, its area is less than Pakistan. We have no doubts that indian military must be having complete monitoring of our nukes / sites. What do you think our mil intel is sleeping?

What a childish thinking about taking nukes out of each other. :lol: :lol:


so many kids. make dis forum for 18+
 
.
We simply dont care what these nukes are 'intended for', we even dont care how many of these we will be able to use. One thing for which india is always afraid of is the quality of nukes, even if we use 5% of these, that would be sufficient for india. The said fear was even revealed in wikileaks.

Now talking about geographical area, even France is the third largest nuke holding country in the world, its area is less than Pakistan. We have no doubts that indian military must be having complete monitoring of our nukes / sites. What do you think our mil intel is sleeping?

What a childish thinking about taking nukes out of each other. :lol: :lol:

Okay so you admit that 5% of nukes i.e around 5-10 nukes are enough for India .

Then it proves the fact that you are in fact wasting valuable resources by producing nuke after nuke when clearly you have exceeded the required limit. And This is the point on which several of the posters are arguing ---is it necessary for more production of nukes ??? read the earlier posts..


and :rofl: :rofl: at your comparison of Pakistan with Countries like France and U.K --- do you have any idea of their delivery mechanisms in comparison to yours ??

you can start here --

for U.K
Vanguard class submarine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

for france
Force océanique stratégique - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

AC 's with nuke capable Rafale :

French aircraft carrier Charles de Gaulle (R91) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not to mention they are part of NATO coalition
, with the full might of Uncle Sam's considerable capabilities behind them .....You think any subcontinental power ( including India ) can match them ???
 
.

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom