Nope. Nothing justifies a nuclear strike. You will be called Nazis after that.
Anyway, I gave you a nuke map. Check the nuke map.
Oh really? Then how do you explain this?
Check from 3:00.
They walked into ground zero the next day. In fact you can start clearing debris and rebuilding damaged buildings from the very next week.
The opposite. In 65 we were weaker. In 71 we were stretched between 2 fronts. Today, we have a far superior AF, far superior army and far superior navy. There is no real comparison. In 1987 itself we had achieved teh capability necessary to push very deep into Pakistan.
It is Pakistan's conventional weakness the reason why Pak leaders keep threatening us with nuclear weapons every few weeks. That's why tactical nukes were introduced.
Dams are one more target that are illegal to be targeted. But check what will happen if Mangla and Tarbela are destroyed.
You need 3:1 ratio to invade, and we have much more than that.
India can make it so that all 6 rivers belong to India. And dude, there are 6 rivers, not 5. Go look at the river map.
When we say "Land of Five Rivers", there is no Indus mentioned.
1000 times more powerful is not equal to 1000 times more devastating.
Nuclear bombs were small when they started. Then they became big because the missiles were not accurate. Now they are small again because missiles are accurate.
You don't have even 10% of Russia's arsenal and you are threatening us with a nuclear war?
All you have are a few dozen atom bombs. And you have totally discounted India's ballistic missile defence.
If you go nuclear, do you know how much worse our troops will be towards Pakistani targets? We will be killing civilians also in your own cities. Most of Pakjab will be empty. How will you launch guerrilla warfare when there are no civilians to hide amongst? Our troops will be practically killing everything that moves.
You forget that even we have nukes. And you don't have money, or the military strength to fight anymore.