You do realize that the courts cannot enforce anything. And our argument will be "terrorism". It's fair. We will tell the world that it is up to Pakistan whether the treaty has to continue or not.
We can call for negotiations on a new 'fair' treaty, which can take 10+ years. The current treaty gives Pakistan way too much water. Let's make it 50-50 as it should be.
Russia is not an existential threat to the US even though they have 5000 nukes. You are threatening us with a hundred? India won't die even if both Pak and China nuke us.
If Pak nukes India, India will takeover Pak. What makes another country an existential threat is the military force, not nukes.
You see, we have the money necessary to rebuild our cities, you don't. We are already building multiple cities everywhere, forget rebuilding existing cities after a nuclear strike.
https://www.theguardian.com/public-.../singapore-building-india-city-andhra-pradesh
http://zeenews.india.com/business/b...n-delhi-mumbai-industrial-corridor_71197.html
I don't get why you guys think of the nuclear option as some suicide decision. Even if the US or Russia nukes India, it won't kill India. We will simply rebuild.
In fact, India has more cities than Pak has nukes.
Would suggest looking at the river map.