What's new

Pakistan finalized Z-10ME Helicopters deal with China : Journalist Sumaira Khan

even MANPADS can destroy Attack Helicopters
and still you are talking about Fighter Jets
then Fighter Jets also easly can hunt Attack Helicopters in a Pak-Ind scenario

AKINCI UCAV is another level to destroy enemy Tanks,Howitzers,IFVs,MLRS from 30-50 km away
thanks to MAM-T laser guided smart munition ( almost 100 kg )
View attachment 808121

also 40 km KUZGUN-KY is coming to carry by UCAVs
View attachment 808122

also 50 km ASELSAN small Bomb with IIR seeker to hit even moving Tanks ( 100 kg )
View attachment 808124

if needed even from 150-200 km away ....

Attack Helicopters can not do it ... armed with only 8 km Missiles
RIP all Helicopter Pilots in a Pak-Ind scenario

even AKINCI UCAV 25-65 km BOZDOGAN-GOKDOGAN air to air Missiles to hit other UCAVs and Attack Helicopters
How much does the Turkish defense industry pay you to advertise Turkish drones everywhere? Basically dodged all my questions and points and regurgitated your last message for the third time. Damn. I can say without a doubt if gunships were easier to make and Turkish helicopter industry was stronger you’d be shilling for that right now instead.

>skips point about modern SHORADS and CIWS defending gunships from munitions and jets.
>skips point about drones being easily vulnerable to a jet even if said jet is armed with nothing but a machine gun.
>skips point about drones not being able to do anti-infantry work.
>skips point about drones needing airfields and not being able to land in forward combat areas
>literally doesn’t know about modern helicopter munitions.

I’m not saying Turkish drones are bad, Turkey has a successful drone industry with many export customers, including Pakistan if the rumors are to be believed, we buy them for a reason, because they’re useful. but drones won’t replace gunships, at least not yet, they have their separate roles, which is why Turkey and Pakistan buy and operate both things. (Could Drones replace gunships in the future? Absolutely, we will even see gunship drones as well as fighter jet drones, but the helicopter will always have some advantages over a fixed winged aircraft)
 
Last edited:
.
How much does the Turkish defense industry pay you to advertise Turkish drones everywhere? Basically dodged all my questions and points and regurgitated your last message for the third time. Damn. I can say without a doubt if gunships were easier to make and Turkish helicopter industry was stronger you’d be shilling for that right now instead.


Turkey has Industry to produce Attack Helicopter too
( 5 tons T-129 , soon 6 tons T-629 and 11 tons monster T-929 by 2023 ... only USA-Russia-Turkey-China .... )
and in 3-5 years indigenous TEI Turboshaft Engines for Attack Helicopters too


only one question

why Turkey used UCAVs instead of T-129 Attack Helicopters against Syrian Regime Army in Idlib/Syria ?

because Attack Helicopters would be failed ....


already RIP all Helicopter Pilots in a Pak-Ind scenario
so easy to hit Attack Helicopters
Russians lost over 300 Helicopters in Afghanistan , against even non-regular Army


Enemy Forces even will not see AKINCI UCAVs armed with 30-50-150-250 km Missiles / IIR - laser guided Bombs

the enemy will only hear the sound of the missile and boooom
1642051733027.png
 
Last edited:
.
Can we PLEASE focus on the Z-10ME. There are dedicated thread for the Turkish gunships and UAV’s.
 
.
Can we PLEASE focus on the Z-10ME. There are dedicated thread for the Turkish gunships and UAV’s.


Then please delete this stuff! He is contsantly derailing several threads as if he is a salesman for Turkish drones, which are irrelevant since off-topic here. We don't need an enless list of what UAVs Turkey build, what they can carry and what they distroyed in every thread.
 
.
only one question

why Turkey used UCAVs instead of T-129 Attack Helicopters against Syrian Regime Army in Idlib/Syria ?

Everyone use UCAVs for such stuff. Its just strikes. That's what we are saying UCAVs are good in this case where you have to take HVTs over hostile territory.

Gunships are for active battle-zone. If turkey's ground troops get into a battle against enemy infantry / armoured vehicles, an active battle zone. Then they will use gunships to support its troops.
 
.
Which ATGM would Pakistan use on its Z10ME? Also could we see a simultaneous purchase of new ATGM launchers and missiles for the army?
 
. .
Slow acqusition of attack helicopters clearly depicts that Pakistan Army is rather more interested in building UCAV fleet. From Chinese to Turkish, along with made in Pakistan UAVs are being procured in where as, we seemed to be not that in hurry to buy attack helicopters.
 
. . . . .
Why doesn't Pakistan consider Mi-28 or KA-50 series helis from Russia ? Why go for Mi-35s ?

During operations against terrorist in Af-Pak border areas PA faced situation where they had to send in Cobras to hit terrorist while Mi-17s waited for clearance from Cobras that area is safe for landing and pick up injured troops, Mi-35 negated this situation allowing freeing of PA gunship helicopters, also Mi-35 can defend itself and have protected cabin for carrying troops.
 
. .
I know Sumaira Khan well. During last several years she has provided breaking news about HQ9, ,J10c, Chinese UAV, Wing Long2 , TB2, JF17 Block3 , new Pak army rife made in Taxilla factory, and all major weapons that Pakistan bought from China. All her news proved 100 true. Because she has close contacts and take crucial arms news directly from army officials..
So, this time ,her news about Z-10 ME helicopters is 100 % true.
Nothing will happen ,if you say Sumaria khan is wrong.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom