What's new

Pakistan F-16 Discussions 2

Hi,

It is simply not about the stealth---but what is behind that stealth package that is the back breaker---.

There is a reason that americans are strutting around---they want to test their newer weapons on a more capable enemy than Iraq---many times more capable---.

Why have the russians kept their mouths shut----because they know that they are no match for the americans---.

The chinese are getting impatient---because they have amassed better and capable weapons---but until and unless the chinese don't have 10 aircraft carriers and 400 J20's +++ aircraft---they just need to keep their heads down and keep on building---.

Americans "strutting their stuff" is more of a PR stunt. However, having said that, the real reason why the Americans were so keen on staying in Syria (in particular), was to test out Russian military hardware against their own. As for the Russians, they aren't in the habit of being big headed. Su-57's deployment in Syria was for particular reason, because Raptors were deployed in Qatar, supporting so-called U.S campaign against ISIS. Let's get one thing straight (for the nay sayers on Su-57s) the Frazors haven't received their RAM coatings as of yet. The reason for that is because the Russian industry experts view the maintenance of composite fatigue detection, as pivotal to the aircraft's serviceability and performance. Therefore composite fatigue detection was created on not only the manufacturing level, but also depot maintenance level as well. Technology was created for this particular reason and hence the reason why we haven't seen any Su-57s (pre-production models) with RAM coatings like the Chinese have on their J-20s. Also, there was the wait for Izdeliye-30 engines, which are specifically developed for the Su-57 Frazors. So the Americans ain't got squat on the Russians. Besides, the Chinese are in the same boat as the Russians, as they too await the WS-15 engines to reach serial production phase. The Russians are slightly ahead of the Chinese in that, their Izdeliye-30 is geared to go into serial production this year (2019), whereas the Chinese might get the WS-15 into serial production by next year. Given that China is a manufacturing powerhouse, it would probably catch up with the Russian and perhaps even surpass their production rate by 2022.

So by 2025, both Russia and China would field at least 2 squadrons or more. That is when we would see how things fare, when J-20s are deployed in South China Sea and Su-57s deployed in the Black Sea. See how the Americans strut their stuff then. Russians are smart, unlike their dumb predecessors (Soviets/Bolsheviks), they prioritized the development of super weapons like Kinzhal and Avanguard. Sure the Americans were ranting away that these weapons aren't anywhere near operational and doubted the Russian claims. Then two days ago, when Russia tested it's HGV (Avanguard), it had the Americans shitting their pants. So not all is what it seems my dear brother, and any country that underestimates Russia, does it at their own detriment.
 
. .
I think if history is any indication, any country that underestimates the US does it at its own detriment. Russia and China know this full well and will never engage the behemoth directly.

It is the other way round, China with its gargantuan BRI "marshal plan" and Russia with its massive Gas Pipeline expansion in Asia and Europe, neither is looking to fight any war with any country. America on the other hand, with its $21 trillion behemoth of a debt, massive unemployment, homelessness, and with DJI crashing over 10 times in 2018. Is actually the one looking to provoke wars. 1000 military bases around the world, America is nothing of what it was during the Cold War. It's biggest, most deadliest enemy is itself. Russia and China don't need to challenge America to war, rather just wait for it to crush under its own weight. When it comes to history, it doesn't seem that America has learnt anything from it ... two words, Soviet Union.
 
.
Americans are a lot more resilient then people give them credit for. And yes, if they have to, they will pick and start a fight/war, whether it is for economic gains, strategic reasons or just to keep the status quo as the sole super power. Even when they don't "win" they leave the other side in utter ruins, and history is a testament to that.
 
.
Americans are a lot more resilient then people give them credit for. And yes, if they have to, they will pick and start a fight/war, whether it is for economic gains, strategic reasons or just to keep the status quo as the sole super power. Even when they don't "win" they leave the other side in utter ruins, and history is a testament to that.

History also testifies to the fact that all empires collapse, from Babylonians, to the Persians, the Mongols, Romans, British ... all collapsed. Almost all of them felt they were invincible, indestructible, resilient, benevolent, exceptional and whatever else. America is no exception to this, and history shall testify yet again. There will always be someone stronger, more powerful to rise and challenge. There will always be someone smarter and of sound judgment to surpass the old. On March 2018, Russia showed the world, that no one including America, should ever test Russia's resolve. China has also shown that it will not be bullied into accepting anything, and it has done so by embarking upon a gargantuan naval shipbuilding the likes of which are none in modern history.

Oh and the part about America leaving its opponents in ruins, even if it lost the war. Vietnam would be smiling about now, reading what is being posted here. The last time America faced an equal opponent, was back in 1945. The world has changed a lot since then, and what America is now, isn't where it would want to be, facing an equal opponent. Russia is NOT the Soviet Union, and China is not Japan.

So yes, America will start a war or wars just like Germany did when it declared war on Soviets. And just like Germany couldn't afford not to start a war with the Soviets (to keep the war machine running). So too America cannot afford not to start a war, because it's run out of enemies and has to invent them to justify 1000 military bases around the world and $700 billion defense budget while it's veterans sleep rough, and countless American households toil 3-4 jobs to stay afloat and hundreds of thousands of young Americans in student finance debt before they even begin their jobs.

You can keep living in la la land, thinking America would bounce back and defeat Russia and China. So I remind the world again, Russia is NOT the Soviet Union, and China is NOT Japan. Two decades time, the world would realize the flaw in the American "Exceptionalism." Because the ones who created America and the ones who built America, are long dead and the ones who run America today, are NOTHING like what their predecessors were in the 18th century and never will be like them.
 
Last edited:
.
I think if history is any indication, any country that underestimates the US does it at its own detriment. Russia and China know this full well and will never engage the behemoth directly.
They dont need to do it militarily. However financially US can be ruined but at a great cost to China and the Panda will wait for the right time.
A
 
Last edited:
.
As for your question, not even you can prove American tech is superior to China or Russia. So please don't waste both our times with such questio

It seems your logic works well when you mentioned a RAM coating tech along with names of some Eastern turbofan engines to claim Eastern aircrafts “catched” US in terms of superiority/generation. How logical is that? Turkey has an active program developing a 27000lbf turbofan engine for stealth TF-X program. Besides, Turkish industry have a matured stealth tech working for mid section of F35 in paralel to designing/developing own stealth fighter jet. When those programs finished, Should we able to claim Turkey “catched” US in aircraft technology ? Not likely. It is not that simple...but I just wanted to know It is same Russia we talk above which lacks technologically behind in AESA and Optic technologies? That’s why they are struggling to develop own first equivalent product in those years ( whether they perform superior (?) is a big question), while US ruling the World in those fields since decades. I need to mention difficulties Russia facing to develop a stealth aircraft since tens of years as well (India agreed to exit Russian multinational fighter program cause of many voiced concern), while US has mastered the active battle proven stealth technology with bomber, air superiority and ground suppression fighters since 30-40 years. I think It is also important to talk about VTOL and STOVL technology that No country could come close to this league technologically. What China introduced as thrust vector nozzle in recent months, has been applied to F16 aircrafts by early 1990’s. US do not even consider dogfights as a serious maneouvring tactics to apply a similar TVC on their new designed aircrafts but They use similar TVC technology on AA missiles to convert them a deadly 360 degree maneouvrable systems, while HMDS enable pilots to locks on enemy fighters at any position whether It locates inside the coverage of airborne radars or not so they don’t need to stress aircraft with making sharp maneouvrings to defeat them. Besides, If China was such an advanced state technologically in subcomponent level, Pakistan would have never seeked/favored any Western components/sensors for Chinese designed fighters. I am in no position to defend US technological superiority in here since they issue sanctions to my country Although Turkey invested almost 1 billion $ to F35 program but It must be a mentally blind not to consider all those realities on the table to talk about superiority/inferiority things. Thanks God that China and Russia like states are not ruled by “la la land” policies but realistic mindset not to drive the World into a disaster with superiority complex, when they revealed a flying fighter.
 
Last edited:
.
Americans are a lot more resilient then people give them credit for.

Wrong!! Americans today, are nothing like the Americans of the 1800s. Back when freedom and justice actually meant something. Back when there still a code of honor, integrity and
It seems your logic works well when you mentioned a RAM coating tech along with names of some Eastern turbofan engines to claim Eastern aircrafts “catched” US in terms of superiority/generation. How logical is that? Turkey has an active program developing a 27000lbf turbofan engine for stealth TF-X program and having a matured stealth tech working for mid section of F35 in paralel to designing of own stealth fighter jet. When those programs finished, Should we able to claim Turkey “catched” US in aircraft technology ? Not likely. It is not that simple...but I just wanted to know It is same Russia you talk above which lacks technologically behind in AESA and Optic technologies? That’s why they are struggling to develop own first equivalents today ( performing superior (?) is a big question), while US ruling the World in those fields since decades. It is needed to mention difficulties Russia facing to develop a stealth aircraft since tens of years ? (India agreed to exit Russian multinational fighter program cause of many voiced concern), while US has mastered the stealth fighter technology with bomber, air superiority and ground suppression fighters since 30-40 years. I think It is important to talk about VTOL and STOVL technology that No country could come close to their technologies. What China introduced as thrust vector nozzle today has been applied to US F16 aircrafts by early 1990’s. US do not even consider dogfights as a serious maneouvring tactics to apply a similar TVC on their new designed aircrafts but They use similar TVC technology on AA missiles to convert them a deadly 360 degree maneouvrable while HMDS enable pilots to locks on enemy fighters at any position whether It stays inside of airborne radar coverage or not so they don’t need to stress aircraft with making sharp maneouvrings to defeat them. Besides, If China was such an advanced state technologically in subcomponent level, Pakistan would have never seeked/favored any Western components/sensors for Chinese designed fighters. I am in no position to defend US technological superiority in here since they issue sanctions to my country Although Turkey invested almost 1 billion $ to F35 program but It must be a mentally blind not to consider all those reality on the table to talk about superiority/inferiority things. Thanks God that China and Russia like states are not ruled by “la la land” policies but realistic mindset not to drive the World into a disaster with superiority complexes, when they revealed a flying fighter.

Alright, maybe there is a miscommunication here, language barrier or perhaps I am not making myself clear enough when I say this. But I never said that anything to the tune of Russian or Chinese being superior to Americans on aircraft engine technology.

What I did say was that in "some areas," both Russia and China have "caught up" with America in terms of both technology and in "some respects" have surpassed America in terms of offensive capability. For example, America has been trying to develop hypersonic capability for years, yet it has zero operational hypersonic weapons nor platforms to show for it. Whereas Russia has not only successfully developed hypersonic weapons, but is also beginning to field operational "Avanguard" HGVs (Hypersonic Glide Vehicle) & "Kinzhal" ALHMs (Air Lauched Hypersonic Missile). That is factual, not some made up story in a hollywood fantasy movie.

When you speak of Russia, and claim that they lag behind the U.S in terms of technology. It seems a tad disingenuous to your own intelligence. Simply because Russia has in the past led America in many innovative aircraft technologies. Like the fielding of operational HMCS (Helmet Mounted Cuing System) with HOBS (High Off Bore Sight) WVR missiles, on their MiG-29s and Su-27s. America had NOTHING like that on their aircraft back then, and it wasn't until the last decade, that it finally introduced JHMCS & AIM-9X on F-16s, F/A-18s & F-15s. The fact that F-22s have just recently received the same JHMCS/AIM-9X tech, says a lot for the "oh so great and benevolent America". Whereas Russia had introduced this technology decades ago. Same as TVC tech on engines, Russia introduced this tech decades before America did it for the first time on F-22s.

So please don't try to argue the case that America is unsurpassable, too invincible to be overtaken by Russia or China. The only reason why Russia has been behind in fielding operational stealth jets, destroyers or other tech, is not because it doesn't have the technology. Rather because it "PRIORITIZED" on what was far more important in strategic terms, when faced with a very active effort by America to choke Russia's rise to being a powerhouse. Consistent sanctions, active effort to drive down the oil prices, threatening Europe to not buy Natural Gas from Russia, meddling in Ukraine, funding ISIS terrorist in Syria (an aim to cheat Russia out of its military base in Tartus, Syria), western media whining like a toddler accusing Russia of meddling in US elections in order to slap on more sanctions. All of these things are precisely why Russia CHOSE prioritize on strategic game changing weapons, as oppose to pour all of its money (while oil prices declined and sanctions imposed) on stealth aircraft development.

So let me break this down for you in as simple words as I can, in order for you to fully understand the ground reality .... An F-22 Raptor is worthless, when NORAD detects multiple Nuclear Hypersonic Glide Vehicles descending on continental United States, maneuvering through the atmosphere, at Mach 20 speed.

This is the part where Russia says, "Check!" Using the term from the chess game. And America scrambles for a response, which as it stands, is actually happening now.

Also, that reference where you say that America doesn't even consider dog fights anymore, is a misnomer. As USAF has in its curriculum, BFM (Basic Fighter Maneuvers) which teaches pilots exactly that. And America mastering stealth accounts for squat, when it only manufactures 187 Raptors. The last time in history America had foregone WVR combat, it paid a heavy price for it in Vietnam. So much so, that the F-4 Phantoms, had to be fitted with external cannon in order to compensate for the lack of any, when the aircraft was designed. That flaw, was due to the same thinking you have mentioned above.

Su-57 Frazors have 6 AESA radars incorporated into it. The Su-35 Flanker-Es have Irbis-E which is a hybrid radar designed specifically to detect low to very low observable stealth aircraft. Electro Optics and IRST have been pioneered by Russia, who lead in the technology from the front for decades.

It was not the Americans, rather the Israelis who pioneered TVC on their Python missiles. The first American TVC AAM was the AIM-9X, which came out in the past decade or so, whereas other countries have been fielding such missiles for decades.

Lastly, my posts have been directed at the very mindset that my country (Pakistan) has about Western technology. Pakistan has suffered a great deal due to its handicap of Western technology. Precisely because America uses this as leverage against Pakistan and countless other countries who have bought American military hardware. My aim is to shed light on the fact that American technology is NOT the final answer to everything. China has proven this time and time again and so has Russia. This habitual trait needs to be eradicated, because when it has been, Pakistan has benefited from it. The likes of JF-17 Thunders would have never become a reality, if Pakistan was still fixated on Western technology. Which is why, JF-17 Thunders are powered by Russian engines and Chinese avionics, instead of Western ones. Thank God that sensibility prevailed over the dogma that none can match western technology. Because that ship has sailed, and the myth is blown away.

Mark my words, American technology is not the answer for those nations who exercize their right to independent foreign policy. Because either you are an independent country, or you are a vassal state of the Zionist States of America, period!!!
 
Last edited:
.
Americans "strutting their stuff" is more of a PR stunt. However, having said that, the real reason why the Americans were so keen on staying in Syria (in particular), was to test out Russian military hardware against their own. As for the Russians, they aren't in the habit of being big headed. Su-57's deployment in Syria was for particular reason, because Raptors were deployed in Qatar, supporting so-called U.S campaign against ISIS. Let's get one thing straight (for the nay sayers on Su-57s) the Frazors haven't received their RAM coatings as of yet. The reason for that is because the Russian industry experts view the maintenance of composite fatigue detection, as pivotal to the aircraft's serviceability and performance. Therefore composite fatigue detection was created on not only the manufacturing level, but also depot maintenance level as well. Technology was created for this particular reason and hence the reason why we haven't seen any Su-57s (pre-production models) with RAM coatings like the Chinese have on their J-20s. Also, there was the wait for Izdeliye-30 engines, which are specifically developed for the Su-57 Frazors. So the Americans ain't got squat on the Russians. Besides, the Chinese are in the same boat as the Russians, as they too await the WS-15 engines to reach serial production phase. The Russians are slightly ahead of the Chinese in that, their Izdeliye-30 is geared to go into serial production this year (2019), whereas the Chinese might get the WS-15 into serial production by next year. Given that China is a manufacturing powerhouse, it would probably catch up with the Russian and perhaps even surpass their production rate by 2022.

So by 2025, both Russia and China would field at least 2 squadrons or more. That is when we would see how things fare, when J-20s are deployed in South China Sea and Su-57s deployed in the Black Sea. See how the Americans strut their stuff then. Russians are smart, unlike their dumb predecessors (Soviets/Bolsheviks), they prioritized the development of super weapons like Kinzhal and Avanguard. Sure the Americans were ranting away that these weapons aren't anywhere near operational and doubted the Russian claims. Then two days ago, when Russia tested it's HGV (Avanguard), it had the Americans shitting their pants. So not all is what it seems my dear brother, and any country that underestimates Russia, does it at their own detriment.

Hi,

There is no PR stunt in the american weapons industry---. It is simply and purely designed to decimate the enemy---.

The biggest fear I have of the united states is when it claims that the enemy has a potent fighting system that the US is concerned about---.

I know that is a lie---because the americans are intentionally spreading it for the opponent to dare---so that they can try their new goodies---.
 
.
Hi,

There is no PR stunt in the american weapons industry---. It is simply and purely designed to decimate the enemy---.

The biggest fear I have of the united states is when it claims that the enemy has a potent fighting system that the US is concerned about---.

I know that is a lie---because the americans are intentionally spreading it for the opponent to dare---so that they can try their new goodies---.

Yes I can appreciate and share your apprehension on this matter. And I do know that when Americans are "talking up" the capability of the adversary country. That they do so in order to scare the living day lights outta the U.S Congress and the American people. Having said that however, this time around, I believe (strongly) that as March 2018, America has reached the point of where "the boy who cried wolf one too many times." I say this because the control levers are no longer in their hands.

Although this looks a lot like the Cold War, more dynamic in other respects. And even though I have a sneaking suspicion that there is something up their sleeve. This time around, the playing field is being leveled. Russia is NOT the Soviet Union, and China is not Japan. This time around, it is not all hot air from the Soviets. Reason being, Russia doesn't bluff and has the balls to launch a full scale retaliation nuclear strike on America and its allies. If they try anything, or be a smartass, they will have hell to pay for. China isn't bluffing either, despite its massive BRI projects, spanning continents. China has warned America with a bold straight face, that if America interferes in the Taiwan matter. That China wouldn't hesitate sinking one or more American aircraft carriers in the South China Sea with a saturated missile strike.

Remember, it is not Russia or China that are looking for war, rather it is America. And the reason why America is yearning for an open conflict, is because war would remedy its economic crises, which by the way, is in a critical state. I will quote you just one statistic here, to show you how desperate America really is. In the year 2018, the Dow Jones Industrial on the New York Merchantile Exchange, plummeted 500 in a single day of trading, at least 10 times last year. Historically, this has been the worst year for Wall Street. Also, one of America's biggest corporations, Apple Inc. saw $450 billion wiped off its capital value last year. This is not an America which has to ability to wage war, let alone win it.
 
.
Last 13 were slep but avionics were still air def versionand costed 75 million with lots of support eqpt and simulator

These 15 not sure but has slep plus avionics upgrade m3 so not sure what is asking price and worth the price

Lastly US approval needed which might be possible due to Afghan talks
 
.
Last 13 were slep but avionics were still air def versionand costed 75 million with lots of support eqpt and simulator

These 15 not sure but has slep plus avionics upgrade m3 so not sure what is asking price and worth the price

Lastly US approval needed which might be possible due to Afghan talks
I hope we will get these planes quick retirement of one more F7 SQDs
 
.
Like the fielding of operational HMCS (Helmet Mounted Cuing System) with HOBS (High Off Bore Sight) WVR missiles, on their MiG-29s and Su-27s. America had NOTHING like that on their aircraft back then, and it wasn't until the last decade, that it finally introduced JHMCS & AIM-9X on F-16s, F/A-18s & F-15s. The fact that F-22s have just recently received the same JHMCS/AIM-9X tech, says a lot for the "oh so great and benevolent America". Whereas Russia had introduced this technology decades ago.


It ia difficult to proceed a conversation on mobile phone but Lets correct your misinformation about some subjects...


First seeds of Helmet mounted sight system have been spreaded by Hughes System in 1962. They have revealed first electrocular head mounted monocular display which was able to reflect TV signal into a transparent eyepiece.

First US Helmet mounted sight system was developed by Honeywell and flew in 1974-1978 with F-14/15 aircrafts.

First Helmet mounted sight system in history has been developed by Carl Zeiss Optronic/Hensoldh Optronics in 1970’s and used them on France made Mirage fighters oprated by S. Africa. After S.African aircrafts with HMDS was proven on combat with downing Soviet fighters, Soviets picked this up and applied for own fighters in 1985.

It is certain that Someone introduced this technology decade ago but It is not Russians indeed. With continuous advancing on sight and sensor technology, Today, Russia lacks behind in current generation helmet sight systems against West since the market is totally dominated by US/Israeli and European systems.


please don't try to argue the case that America is unsurpassable, too invincible to be overtaken by Russia or China. The only reason why Russia has been behind in fielding operational stealth jets, destroyers or other tech, is not because it doesn't have the technology. Rather because it "PRIORITIZED" on what was far more important in strategic terms

I do not claim US is unsurpassable. What I am doing is just making my point based on facts of current age. It is not my concern If Russians doesn’t have a priority on advancing on aircraft technology cause of several politic and monetary reasons. I just put the facts on straight and let them decide which field they want to advance. Consideration like “they have everything superior but their priority is different” shouldn’t be our concern to talk about.

In additions, It is certain that Russia lacks behind in 3th generation quantum well infrared detector technology so they are dependant on foreign sources If they want a superior sight system competing with Western equivalents. To overcome such a difficult technology, they purchased Belarusian thermal sight institute which is able to produce 1st and 2nd generation thermals for tanks and they have already been struggling to develop those detectors as far as I know(If nothing new occured). As an example to emphasize the importance of those detectors to realize How they effect the structure of aircraft, It must be noted that Russia can’t use IIR sensors for spherical coverage like in F-22, the F-35’s DAS. That is why Su-57 still uses UV-based MAWS. Those detectors are the brain of thermals on tanks, attack helicopters, IRST, aircrafts... As you see they don’t have all to be superior and It is not about solely priorities. Russia signed even a deal with Turkey’s Aselsan when they faced crisis with France since they were using SAGEM thermal detectors on anywhere using sight technology. To overestimate Russia, At least do not underestimate Western efforts.



Su-57 Frazors have 6 AESA radars incorporated into it. The Su-35 Flanker-Es have Irbis-E which is a hybrid radar designed specifically to detect low to very low observable stealth aircraft. Electro Optics and IRST have been pioneered by Russia, who lead in the technology from the front for decades.

The Su-57’s primary radar is not only having smaller TRM count (~1,500 vs. ~1,676 and ~2,000 in 3rd gen. APG-81& APG77V1) but also decades behind the West. The US started fielding it’s 1st gen. AESA radar on F-15 since 2000– 18-19 years later, Russia is yet to field their first operational AESA radar on a Fighter. Turkish industry tests own AESA radars in 2018. Irbis-E is not an AESA but PESA+ which is an old generation radar compared to Western radar system.

Side looking arrays is a good idea for 360 degree coverage at WVR ranges If Russia want to close gap created by previous generation UV based MAWS but You know It will end up aiding enemy ESM systems in passively tracking your stealth aircraft which is the worst thing a pilot may want. That is the reason F35 uses electro-optic DAS passive tracking system for not only 360 degree situation awareness but also tracking for HMDS and fire control missions for missiles on same role. That is a good example to realize How technological superiority change the aircraft concept sharply. Once you lack behind on any field, you should sacrifice some critical features to catch the rivals on some specific areas.

BTW, Sukhoi-admitted RCS is 1.0 - 0.1 m2 — 1,000 times larger than the F-22’s overall 0.0001 m2 RCS. It is certain that Sukhoi lags so far behind in that critical tech as to be considered not much better than several conventional 4th gen fighters. That must be the real reason India stepprd back from program. While a giant state like Russia can not reveal a system which can be a match to US in aircraft technology, I don’t even mention China whether they could come close to US. If you ask me, US behaves modest while having way superior indrastructure/technology/manufacturing process compared to anybody in this field.

Lastly, my posts have been directed at the very mindset that my country (Pakistan) has about Western technology. Pakistan has suffered a great deal due to its handicap of Western technology. Precisely because America uses this as leverage against Pakistan and countless other countries who have bought American military hardware. My aim is to shed light on the fact that American technology is NOT the final answer to everything. China has proven this time and time again and so has Russia. This habitual trait needs to be eradicated, because when it has been, Pakistan has benefited from it. The likes of JF-17 Thunders would have never become a reality, if Pakistan was still fixated on Western technology. Which is why, JF-17 Thunders are powered by Russian engines and Chinese avionics, instead of Western ones. Thank God that sensibility prevailed over the dogma that none can match western technology. Because that ship has sailed, and the myth is blown away

I support this approach but It should be corrected as neither West, nor East. There should be just one real way for you. Your own way ! Noone can guarantee that you will not meet similar approach US does when Pakistani and Eastern states’ benefits collapse on any regional and politic subject.
 
Last edited:
.
Hi,

I am not a disrespectful person---but allow me to say---your belief about the US is worth less than the spec of dog sh-it on the sole of my shoe that I wore when I went to work today---.

So---stop this stupidity---.

Well you realize you've just contradicted yourself there. There is no point in me responding to insults, so I will leave at just that, since I don't usually react to incoherent ramble. Good day to you.
 
.
Wrong!! Americans today, are nothing like the Americans of the 1800s. Back when freedom and justice actually meant something. Back when there still a code of honor, integrity and


Alright, maybe there is a miscommunication here, language barrier or perhaps I am not making myself clear enough when I say this. But I never said that anything to the tune of Russian or Chinese being superior to Americans on aircraft engine technology.

What I did say was that in "some areas," both Russia and China have "caught up" with America in terms of both technology and in "some respects" have surpassed America in terms of offensive capability. For example, America has been trying to develop hypersonic capability for years, yet it has zero operational hypersonic weapons nor platforms to show for it. Whereas Russia has not only successfully developed hypersonic weapons, but is also beginning to field operational "Avanguard" HGVs (Hypersonic Glide Vehicle) & "Kinzhal" ALHMs (Air Lauched Hypersonic Missile). That is factual, not some made up story in a hollywood fantasy movie.

When you speak of Russia, and claim that they lag behind the U.S in terms of technology. It seems a tad disingenuous to your own intelligence. Simply because Russia has in the past led America in many innovative aircraft technologies. Like the fielding of operational HMCS (Helmet Mounted Cuing System) with HOBS (High Off Bore Sight) WVR missiles, on their MiG-29s and Su-27s. America had NOTHING like that on their aircraft back then, and it wasn't until the last decade, that it finally introduced JHMCS & AIM-9X on F-16s, F/A-18s & F-15s. The fact that F-22s have just recently received the same JHMCS/AIM-9X tech, says a lot for the "oh so great and benevolent America". Whereas Russia had introduced this technology decades ago. Same as TVC tech on engines, Russia introduced this tech decades before America did it for the first time on F-22s.

So please don't try to argue the case that America is unsurpassable, too invincible to be overtaken by Russia or China. The only reason why Russia has been behind in fielding operational stealth jets, destroyers or other tech, is not because it doesn't have the technology. Rather because it "PRIORITIZED" on what was far more important in strategic terms, when faced with a very active effort by America to choke Russia's rise to being a powerhouse. Consistent sanctions, active effort to drive down the oil prices, threatening Europe to not buy Natural Gas from Russia, meddling in Ukraine, funding ISIS terrorist in Syria (an aim to cheat Russia out of its military base in Tartus, Syria), western media whining like a toddler accusing Russia of meddling in US elections in order to slap on more sanctions. All of these things are precisely why Russia CHOSE prioritize on strategic game changing weapons, as oppose to pour all of its money (while oil prices declined and sanctions imposed) on stealth aircraft development.

So let me break this down for you in as simple words as I can, in order for you to fully understand the ground reality .... An F-22 Raptor is worthless, when NORAD detects multiple Nuclear Hypersonic Glide Vehicles descending on continental United States, maneuvering through the atmosphere, at Mach 20 speed.

This is the part where Russia says, "Check!" Using the term from the chess game. And America scrambles for a response, which as it stands, is actually happening now.

Also, that reference where you say that America doesn't even consider dog fights anymore, is a misnomer. As USAF has in its curriculum, BFM (Basic Fighter Maneuvers) which teaches pilots exactly that. And America mastering stealth accounts for squat, when it only manufactures 187 Raptors. The last time in history America had foregone WVR combat, it paid a heavy price for it in Vietnam. So much so, that the F-4 Phantoms, had to be fitted with external cannon in order to compensate for the lack of any, when the aircraft was designed. That flaw, was due to the same thinking you have mentioned above.

Su-57 Frazors have 6 AESA radars incorporated into it. The Su-35 Flanker-Es have Irbis-E which is a hybrid radar designed specifically to detect low to very low observable stealth aircraft. Electro Optics and IRST have been pioneered by Russia, who lead in the technology from the front for decades.

It was not the Americans, rather the Israelis who pioneered TVC on their Python missiles. The first American TVC AAM was the AIM-9X, which came out in the past decade or so, whereas other countries have been fielding such missiles for decades.

Lastly, my posts have been directed at the very mindset that my country (Pakistan) has about Western technology. Pakistan has suffered a great deal due to its handicap of Western technology. Precisely because America uses this as leverage against Pakistan and countless other countries who have bought American military hardware. My aim is to shed light on the fact that American technology is NOT the final answer to everything. China has proven this time and time again and so has Russia. This habitual trait needs to be eradicated, because when it has been, Pakistan has benefited from it. The likes of JF-17 Thunders would have never become a reality, if Pakistan was still fixated on Western technology. Which is why, JF-17 Thunders are powered by Russian engines and Chinese avionics, instead of Western ones. Thank God that sensibility prevailed over the dogma that none can match western technology. Because that ship has sailed, and the myth is blown away.

Mark my words, American technology is not the answer for those nations who exercize their right to independent foreign policy. Because either you are an independent country, or you are a vassal state of the Zionist States of America, period!!!
Correction to your historical narrative. It was here at Armscor where the first Helmet mounted sights were put together and were in both M3 and F1s to engage Mig-21/23 threats in Angola; Soviets learned from those early encounters and moved to replicate this. The Western forces were later to appreciate this technology 15+ years later on; just as when Iraq experiences showed how poorly US forces were prepared for IEDs that they had then to come begging to us for complete Mine Resistant technology on armoured fighting vehicles - Casspirs are the grand fathers for the larger Oshkosh series with Mamba/RG32s for the later.
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom