Pakistanisage
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2011
- Messages
- 9,450
- Reaction score
- 18
- Country
- Location
only when they are flying low
Don't Cruise Missiles ALWAYS fly LOW ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
only when they are flying low
What the heck do you know about Indian Involvement in Brahmos,and you know cr@p about MTCR
We dont even need a MAch 0.8 cruise missile coz you doesnt even have an ABM,and when did topic of discussion become Anti Ship missile?
It is the world's fastest cruise missile in operation.[4][5] The missile travels at speeds of Mach 2.8 to 3.0.[6] The land-launched and ship-launched versions are already in service, with the air and submarine-launched versions currently in the testing phase
BrahMos - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
New Recruit
I think if it ever happens we can use the cruise missiles to destroy their sheild and then use Ballastic missiles to rain hell.You misunderstand. I was talking about the CURRENT Indian BMD (S-300 based). If India successfully, physically deploys an anti-SRBM to anti-MRBM level layered BMD, then Pakistan's CURRENT Ballistic Missiles will have to face a lot of problems in case of a war.
Thats where Pakistan's future nuclear delivery systems will come in.
LOL jew kid.
Get along with yr wiki's claims.
This really shows yr authenticity.
It is difficult to detect, track and kill a small, and often very low flying cruise missile that fly below radar cover.Why and how?
Shooting down cruise missiles is much much easier than a ballistic missile.
guys,chill,
as the title says:
its a CHALLENGE
not aTHREAT
And who told you that your chinese missile is a cruise missile?
From what I understand , he's pointing to the fact that the CM400-AKG indeed inherits some of the features of a cruise missile despite it being a quasi-ballistic one .
He clearly said this is a cruise missile. And leave him aside. lots of pakistanis have been jumping around saying that this missile is pakistan's answer to brahmos. while it is clearly a 70s tech missile. Do you contest that?
Source for babur 2 being operational?
And who told you that your chinese missile is a cruise missile? Any source or just day dreaming?
I do not think so . From the first day , it is known to be a quasi-ballistic - not purely ballistic but neither a cruise . Interesting thing they be !
A 70's technology missile ? Was that even a joke ?
Visit the respective threads to get answers.
This is mentioned there.
He clearly compared it with Brahmos and used the phrase "cruise missile"
About the second part of your post, i am not interested in discussing anything which i already know to be true. u can find your answers by comparing it with russian missiles of that time.
Why you even need WIKI as source for Brahmos ???
For brahmos debate should be about its range(which is classified) not for speed...
Not my fault , dont raise your blood pressure over that .
Not unexpected . Of course , you aren't . Since you made a flame statement which you do not even understand yourself , every missile has something in common with V2 . Does that make them WWII technology ? @Hyperion
Compare ? I know for one that the Oniks was developed in the 80's , if you understand what I mean .
Its range is 290 km.
Every system's actual specs r classified as they r military stuff.
Our missiles and their ranges r also told false in media.
Thats not a new thing.
But yr missile range is 290km which is disclosed in media n our Barbur-1's range in media is 500-700km babur-2 is b/w 700-1200km but again they r given so in media. Their actual ranges will be known in war times. But still we can safely assume on given media range that Babur still has more range then indian missile. The rumored range for brahmous is said to be b/w 350-390 km.
Still less then babur-1's 500km.