Friday, November 02, 2012
PIA plans to acquire 7 aircraft on lease
ground your own aircraft and lease somebody's aircraft - reeks of corruption!
There's nothing corrupt about it. The tendering process and documents have been very clear and available for all to examine. They were opened at the end of October in the presence of TIP.
Further, if you've got an issue with the tendering process, perhaps you should lay the blame on your uniform heroes at the MoD who initiated the tender under the retd Air Marshall's direction.
There was a lease for 2 Wide body and 6 narrow body A/C. What happened to that? Scrapped?
As above, the tenders were opened at the end of October in Karachi. They will be evaluated and a decision made.
Lease or buy?
If it is for lease, then it depends on whether it is a dry lease or wet lease. If it is a wet lease, then it makes a little bit of sense, to replace the old A310's on some European routes, and some other places. If it is dry lease, a stupid move. You need to get a completely new maintenance infrastructure in place and other associated equipment.
As for a buy, this does not make much sense to me unless they want to get it as a replacement for A310. We already have 777 and 747 in long haul, and a new jumbos are also rumored to be coming (second hand ofcourse). And PIA is also looking at 737NG series as a replacement on short routes.
One thing is for sure, PIA sure is in a mess regarding procurement, and not giving any confidence to the sellers.
The tender is for lease. However, there could be flexibility built into the contract giving PIA the option to purchase the aircraft. One of PIA's B777s is leased from ILFC ( I believe it is AP-BHX) with an option for purchase. Recently, PIA cancelled it's lease of A310 aircraft and bought the aircraft from Airbus.
The B747s in PIAs fleet are in dire repair and are not used on long haul flights. They're used on domestic and middle-eastern sectors.
The ex-Saudi 747s that have been rumoured are just as old and tired. They wouldn't be much help.
You are correct in saying the fleet acquisition has been a mess of late. This is due to a number of factors such as poor financial state, a very powerful pilot and engineering union, multiple management changes, poor economy outlook and perhaps most importantly a poor track record in maintaining it's aircraft. You only need to look at the feeble response PIA received from it's initial aircraft tender: ex-jet airways 737s manufactured circa 2000-2001 and egyptair 777-200s with PW engines from 1998-2000. I don't blame PIA from scrapping that tender and organizing a new bid.
Furthermore the aircraft if leased will be dry-leased. PIA unions would not allow the aircraft to be wet leased as it would outsource their work to contractors.
well the only possible reason for having two different types of engines is that, If the ADs (Airworthiness Directives) are released to the owners/operators of that engine from the manufacture, then the operators would have to ground the fleet in order to fix that problem asap. however if you have an airline that has a single type of aircraft that uses same type of engines then your simply screwed.
by having two different types of engines, you eliminate the possibility of grounding the entire fleet.
Bollocks. You're wrong on all accounts. I can't recall a single aircraft/engine AD in recent years which has prompted an aircraft grounding.
There is no advantage in a small airline like PIA maintaining multiple engine fleets. That strategy pursued on the A310 and B747 has been a pain in the arse for PIA engineering and is extremely expensive. For example, it costs PIA over $2million to have a Rolls-ROyce RB211 transported out and overhauled. It would be even more expensive to try and do it in house. Some of the A310s are currently grounded due to a shortage of PW and GE engine parts (due to birdstrikes mainly!)
Realistically, PIA needs to think about closing down the engineering department and contract out engine and airframe maintenance. It would be much cheaper but would the all powerful engineering union and the PPP allow it? after all it would result in job losses.
Not sure because it's only a rumor, PIA needs to get rid of a310s and 737s, 'technical' difficulties are becoming normal for PIA.
That would be the worst decision ever. When the entire fleets are moving away from A330 and A340s, PIA want's gas guzzlers? Nice.
What a silly statement. The A330 has outsold the Boeing 777 and Boeing 787 this year. In fact, the A330 would have been a much better fit for PIA over the 777. The only route which require the payload range of the 777 is Pakistan-canada and the pak-usa routes are extremely seasonal. Are two routes enough justification for an aircraft?
No one is moving away from a330's, every airline is replacing old ones by buying the new ones, check out the order list for a330's.
Very much so.
Un confirmed reports that Shaheen going for ATR-72.
It's unfortunate that shaheen is having to increase it's domestic service to regional airports. It's one of the reasons why PIA has so many staff and is making very little money due to the regional routes.
The PIA ATR-42 that was involved in the Lahore airport runway skid accident has been apparently written off. Plane markings have been removed and plane is just sitting there since the incident.
Courtesy Historyofpia.com
Repair might not have been found to be economically feasible.
And yet we're constantly told that Pakistan and PIA have the best pilots in the world. Let us hope the ATR fleet doesn't go the way of the Fokker F-50 fleet, many of which had fatal crashes or were written off.
I think airlines in Pakistan should go for Embraer aircrafts. They are cheaper and are equally efficient as compared to Airbus and Boeing. Air Canada and JetBlue are examples of such that use them.
Embraers may be cheaper however they can not be compared on a like for like basis with the Boeing or Airbus offerings as the latter offer much higher seat counts.
Yes, that is why Embraer would be a no go. Shaheen is going for the ATR for short haul national routes.
And ATR and Airbus do share alot between them in terms of tech and manufacturing. ATR has a connection with EADS. ATR begans with a joint venture of Aerospatiale and Aeritalia, and after a while Aerospatiale merged into EADS.
There is no pilot, training, parts or fleet commonality between airbus and ATR aircraft.