Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The deal leaves the Royal Jordanian Air Force with 43-46 front-line F-16AM/BM MLU Block 20 fighters, and 15-18 F-16A/B Block 15 ADFs, of 79 purchased. Not only do they make some money with this sale, they also cut down on the number of RJAF F-16 ADFs that will need expensive mid-life upgrades.
develop 150 jf17 in one night.... is PAF also acquiring Skynet from Cyberdyne Systems? if yes, we should be looking john connor right away!
Excellent post sir. Specially the bold parts. Hope it might help to shut those mouths who are repeating the same lines again and again for the last couple of years here on PDF.It might have fan boy stuff but there has alot of information on different systems which are being used in JF-17.
Having a technology is one thing and developing expertise and tactics to use that tech is other things. We can produce JF-17 in good numbers but can we develop our tactics and experience on JF-17 as much we have on F-16 (3 decades) in 1 year or 2 years. We are currently in the process of developing tactics and exp and this process is very long one .
JF-17 doesnt fit their requirements so Chinese AF is not going to induct them. It was PAF brain child and it will remain so.
Regarding Development of J10-B again . I was not in favor of inducting J-10 B . It doesn't offer something exceptional that our JF-17 cannot offer (might have some issues with ASEA currently as space is bit less but lets see what chinese can come up with).
For fan boys its will be moment of joy thinking about induction of a newer platform in to PAF but when it comes to reality it will be a night mare. We are in process of getting use to (developing expertise and tactics) JF-17 which is currently a new brand plane for PAF.
Should PAF divide its focus .No it shouldn't .
What is the solution then . Get some more F-16s use them as stop gap measure till you get excellent with JF-17 . After which you have induct another platform (advanced 4.5 GEN or may be 5Gen ) replacing older F-16s.
but we should have idea what is thing and whats scrapTypo ...... Plus we can not develop 150 JF-17 in 1 night so we have to buy something that fits our bill and equally fits our requirements.
but we should have idea what is thing and whats scrap
It might have fan boy stuff but there has alot of information on different systems which are being used in JF-17.
Having a technology is one thing and developing expertise and tactics to use that tech is other things. We can produce JF-17 in good numbers but can we develop our tactics and experience on JF-17 as much we have on F-16 (3 decades) in 1 year or 2 years. We are currently in the process of developing tactics and exp and this process is very long one .
JF-17 doesnt fit their requirements so Chinese AF is not going to induct them. It was PAF brain child and it will remain so.
Regarding Development of J10-B again . I was not in favor of inducting J-10 B . It doesn't offer something exceptional that our JF-17 cannot offer (might have some issues with ASEA currently as space is bit less but lets see what chinese can come up with).
For fan boys its will be moment of joy thinking about induction of a newer platform in to PAF but when it comes to reality it will be a night mare. We are in process of getting use to (developing expertise and tactics) JF-17 which is currently a new brand plane for PAF.
Should PAF divide its focus .No it shouldn't .
What is the solution then . Get some more F-16s use them as stop gap measure till you get excellent with JF-17 . After which you have induct another platform (advanced 4.5 GEN or may be 5Gen ) replacing older F-16s.
from few years i think they are not they are enough stupids . can park 4 saab-2000 in open line under a shedYep sure and I think people in PAF are capable enough to judge that . Dont you think ?
Excellent post sir. Specially the bold parts. Hope it might help to shut those mouths who are repeating the same lines again and again for the last couple of years here on PDF.
from few years i think they are not they are enough stupids . can park 4 saab-2000 in open line under a shed
but i don't able to understand why are you purchasing outdated second hand stuffs... i can understand if you are looking for brand new machines to fill in the gaps... but the same money can be invested into further development of jf-17...
Excellent post sir. Specially the bold parts. Hope it might help to shut those mouths who are repeating the same lines again and again for the last couple of years here on PDF.
develop 150 jf17 in one night.... is PAF also acquiring Skynet from Cyberdyne Systems? if yes, we should be looking john connor right away!
You are wrong, it is actually a means to slow down time itself.. one night = 1000 days
Not sure what calculation got you to that number(if it is wrong you will retract that statement).The current rate of production of JF17 is at least 5 times slower than even this number
Not sure what calculation got you to that number(if it is wrong you will retract that statement).
Compared to its contemporaries however, its doing just fine.