What's new

Pakistan bans 'anti-Pakistani Army' film 'Children of War'

Status
Not open for further replies.
.
LOL one saying 33000 and second 45000 and everybody knows the real figure this are just imagining figures from some guys like you.. @Jaanbaz you should go to your Madressa or whatever and learn something better like blast yourself in crowd and SH*T.
Are you that much of a retard that you need spoon feeding, less then half the often mentioned figure of 93000 were combat soldiers, rest were like policemen, custom officials other civil servants and their families.
But then you are a victim of your own propaganda machinery hence it's beyond your comprehension.
 
.
Anyone who thinks Bollywood, or any assortments of woods will even attempt to portray a balanced view of this tragic war, then you might as well take your history lesson from the redneck history channel. Good move for banning this crap.:coffee:
In 1971 my neighbors were Pakistani diplomats. One day they knocked on the door seeking sympathy and counsel. They knew the attitude fostered in the West Pakistan press about their Eastern brethren. They told us their Army's orders. The U.S. government itself was split between the pro-Army President Nixon and the anti-regime State Dept., so there was no help there.

I had never seen a grown man cry before.

Eventually, they decided "whatever Pakistan was supposed to be, this wasn't it" and made the wrenching decision to betray their oath of loyalty to Pakistan and work to achieve the independence of Bangladesh.

So Bollywood might never portray "a balanced view". "Balance" isn't always the right thing to seek.
 
.
Fikar na kar muslay kai harami idhar tere bare baap bethay hain aur delhi bhara para hai border kai paar aa kai tere jaisa aur jamaain gai. :lol:
lol again talking big .... if and when you manage to rape a hindu woman than come and talk about it. Till then keep role playing it.
Taimur :lol:
 
. . .
In 1971 my neighbors were Pakistani diplomats. One day they knocked on the door seeking sympathy and counsel. They knew the attitude fostered in the West Pakistan press about their Eastern brethren. They told us their Army's orders. The U.S. government itself was split between the pro-Army President Nixon and the anti-regime State Dept., so there was no help there.

I had never seen a grown man cry before.

Eventually, they decided "whatever Pakistan was supposed to be, this wasn't it" and made the wrenching decision to betray their oath of loyalty to Pakistan and work to achieve the independence of Bangladesh.

So Bollywood might never portray "a balanced view". "Balance" isn't always the right thing to seek.
if there was a balance among international narration there wouldn't have been any wars.
 
.
In 1971 my neighbors were Pakistani diplomats. One day they knocked on the door seeking sympathy and counsel. They knew the attitude fostered in the West Pakistan press about their Eastern brethren. They told us their Army's orders. The U.S. government itself was split between the pro-Army President Nixon and the anti-regime State Dept., so there was no help there.

I had never seen a grown man cry before.

Eventually, they decided "whatever Pakistan was supposed to be, this wasn't it" and made the wrenching decision to betray their oath of loyalty to Pakistan and work to achieve the independence of Bangladesh.

So Bollywood might never portray "a balanced view". "Balance" isn't always the right thing to seek.

You just happen to have :pleasantry: neighbors :pleasantry: who were involved in most historical events you like to comment on. :rofl::rofl:
 
.
Are you that much of a retard that you need spoon feeding, less then half the often mentioned figure of 93000 were combat soldiers, rest were like policemen, custom officials other civil servants and their families.
But then you are a victim of your own propaganda machinery hence it's beyond your comprehension.
OK So you are saying that 33000 were soldiers, right?? and @Jaanbaz is saying that 45000 were soldier. So, now i think you both should decide which one is retard from you....And share some sources
 
.
There were only 33,000 soldiers in East Pakistan of the PA rest pow were non combatants mostly family member of troops, workers for the government etc.

So how did 33,000 soldiers kill 3 million while fighting an enemy army and a local rebellion at nearly 15 to 1 odds?
Army: 54,154
Navy: 1,381
Air Force: 833
Paramilitary (including police): 22,000
Civilian personnel: 12,000
------------------------------------------
Total: 90,368
indo-pakistani_war_1971_stamp.jpg
 
.
96000 were not soldiers. 45,000 were soldiers rest were civil servants and other Government staff. Is that what they teach you in Hindutva school?

No 33,000 were PA, 12,000 were police officials and the rest were civies either family members of civies who worked in East Pakistan government.

Army: 54,154
Navy: 1,381
Air Force: 833
Paramilitary (including police): 22,000
Civilian personnel: 12,000
------------------------------------------
Total: 90,368

These numbers are off, the total was 93,000 as well.
 
.
Army: 54,154
Navy: 1,381
Air Force: 833
Paramilitary (including police): 22,000
Civilian personnel: 12,000
------------------------------------------
Total: 90,368
what's up with not acknowledging the true numbers in the conflicts.
 
. . .
OK So you are saying that 33000 were soldiers, right?? and @Jaanbaz is saying that 45000 were soldier. So, now i think you both should decide which one is retard from you....And share some sources
Obviously you are, as i said less than half of 93000, if you were good in math, that figure is closer to 45000 than your imagination of 33000.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom