What's new

Pakistan army wants peace, says Musharraf

I agree with most of your post except this part.

Not even the most deluded Pakistani actually believes he or his forefathers had anything to do with ruling anything, let alone India.

The fact is simple.

How to keep up the pretense, nay the very raison d'etre, of an experiment gone horribly wrong.

No. How many times have you seen Pakistanis talking of ruling India. How Hindus were slaves. It matters not that none of them were ruling anything. To them it matters that Muslims were ruling. That is all.
They have been brought up since the beginning being talked about the glory and superiority of Islam. How they were the ruling class. And thus they cannot see that those whom 'they' 'ruled' are now stronger than them and beat them militarily. They cannot accept that the **** n bull story of their martial prowess was a lie.

Thus you see that Pakistanis never accept that they were defeAted by a superior army and country. It's always some politician who sold out their ordained victory. That's because it's easier to blame someone than accept that Indian military is superior. You know how they like to protect the image of themselves in their mind ..they give statements like 'Pakistan is a nation of LIONS led by LAMBS'

It's something quite elaborate they have built in their head.
 
No. How many times have you seen Pakistanis talking of ruling India. How Hindus were slaves. It matters not that none of them were ruling anything. To them it matters that Muslims were ruling. That is all.
They have been brought up since the beginning being talked about the glory and superiority of Islam. How they were the ruling class. And thus they cannot see that those whom 'they' 'ruled' are now stronger than them and beat them militarily. They cannot accept that the **** n bull story of their martial prowess was a lie.

Thus you see that Pakistanis never accept that they were defeAted by a superior army and country. It's always some politician who sold out their ordained victory. That's because it's easier to blame someone than accept that Indian military is superior. You know how they like to protect the image of themselves in their mind ..they give statements like 'Pakistan is a nation of LIONS led by LAMBS'

It's something quite elaborate they have built in their head.

The fact is that You Indians live in denial that you were ruled over by many outsiders NOW its up to you call them Muslims or martians we dont have any issue.
 
No. How many times have you seen Pakistanis talking of ruling India. How Hindus were slaves. It matters not that none of them were ruling anything. To them it matters that Muslims were ruling. That is all.
They have been brought up since the beginning being talked about the glory and superiority of Islam. How they were the ruling class. And thus they cannot see that those whom 'they' 'ruled' are now stronger than them and beat them militarily. They cannot accept that the **** n bull story of their martial prowess was a lie.

Thus you see that Pakistanis never accept that they were defeAted by a superior army and country. It's always some politician who sold out their ordained victory. That's because it's easier to blame someone than accept that Indian military is superior. You know how they like to protect the image of themselves in their mind ..they give statements like 'Pakistan is a nation of LIONS led by LAMBS'

It's something quite elaborate they have built in their head.

Bro we will have to agree to disagree here.

Pakistanis are basically Indians. They are not aliens.

Islam has a way of demanding unflinching revisionalism from its followers.

Be it from the peaceful acceptance of Islam by the Iranians and the settlement of Parsi traders in the Indian subcontinent to the peaceful acceptance of Sufi Islam in undivided India and the parallel adoption of the mantle of the alien invader by the peacefully converted populace.

You see and hear similar fantasies in Egypt as well.

Its as if war and subjugation and persecution and forced conversions never happened. A horrible blot on the pure name of the faith by its enemies.

But revisionalism is for the consumption of outsiders, and a balm to one's own doubts bubbling up from within. It helps to maintain the steadfast belief.

But it does not penetrate beyond a point. The core DNA retains the parent faith.

This is true for any convert in the world. Across generations.

Who you are is hardwired by the parent faith of the parent soil of your dominant bloodline.

And that part always knows the truth. :cheers:
 
The Indian motive was quite simple; slice Pakistan in half, destabilize it, weaken it to the point that it accepts India as the hegemonic and final arbitrator of South Asia. Please don't give me the same old B.S that India only moved in after the refugees poured into India. The declassified files are proof enough that RAW was supporting Mukti Bahini long before the refugees moved in, and Manekshaw was planning for a year to attack Former East Pakistan.

There is no cure for Indian Boogeyman syndrome, Pakistani Army has fed of it for years and will do so for till the end.

as far as the title is concerned, Musharraf is absolutely right, pakistan army does want peace, any conflict with India comes with a chance of reducing its power over the nation.... 71's loss saw bhutto taking over... Pakistani army will not risk relinquishing power to another civilian leader.
 
Uske baad?? She said trying is the first step?? So far first step itself is a failure.. Whats next??

Punjab.

With Sindh warring for separate statehood.

Balochistan as an independent gateway - overland - to Iran and Afghanistan (once Sindh breaks away).

NWFP joining forces with Afghanistan.

Final chapter -

Punjabis from both sides work out trade free zone and schengen visa formalities.

And West Punjab (of the erstwhile Islamic Republic) now joins Nepal, Bangladesh, and Bhutan as protectorates (with an internal territorial army).
 
The Indian motive was quite simple; slice Pakistan in half, destabilize it, weaken it to the point that it accepts India as the hegemonic and final arbitrator of South Asia. Please don't give me the same old B.S that India only moved in after the refugees poured into India. The declassified files are proof enough that RAW was supporting Mukti Bahini long before the refugees moved in, and Manekshaw was planning for a year to attack Former East Pakistan.

These declassified files are proof enough Pakistan was supporting Naga and Mizo Insurgents as early as 1960s

farland7apr1970b.jpg


farland7apr1970c.jpg


farland7apr1970d.jpg


India merely returned the favor
 
Doc we disagree on the reasons but we both agree on the way forward.
And the powers that be in the South Block agree as well. Keep Pakistan on the boil while we pull ahead. Till the time comes when even Pakistanis cannot think of comparing India and Pakistan.
 
Doc we disagree on the reasons but we both agree on the way forward.
And the powers that be in the South Block agree as well. Keep Pakistan on the boil while we pull ahead. Till the time comes when even Pakistanis cannot think of comparing India and Pakistan.
Actually south block doesn't need to do anything... just observe... Pakistani policies are doing our bidding.
 
It was the same niyat when you went to East Pakistan and Siachen,” he replied when asked what was the niyat behind the 1999 Kargil conflict.

Source: http://www.defence.pk/forums/pakist...wants-peace-says-musharraf.html#ixzz2E0xGLK5a

This is how a lion roars. he is not scared of hurting the Indians. LOL. In India he tells them on their faces the sentence about the Niyat of attacking us first and getting Kargil in reply.

:lol:An other indian in the Pakistani colours:rofl:
 
Musharraf always forgets the Indian motive behind 1971 and justifies his cowardly act of 1999.

LOL there is no justification in interfairing into others internal matters be it Kargil, Siachin or East Pakistan.
 
Back
Top Bottom