Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does it matter whether they use police or army? Insurgency is insurgency. it's just that Indians choose to be foolish and accept half measures that's why their police is suffering heavy casulties and much of central Indian states are under Maoists control.Indian police forces fight with maoists and not army.India is against using force and bombing against its own people unlike Pakistani army.
Check out the casualities on both sides due to terrorists and this will give you a perspective about proffessionalism.
Wow, this is a conspiracy. You should call every news organization and tell them that American generals are intentionally losing, and siding with the enemy, don't forget to provide them with proof. They are traitors to the American people, enemy of the state and should be court-martialed and executed....The Americans can, they CHOOSE not to.
It is the taliban and ISIS that beats women, children and defenseless civilians, not USA. An outraged USA will bomb their enemy as they see fit, who has the courage to stop them?
Ok you keep saying destroyed Taliban and destroyed Saddam Hussein like an old record player. Open your eyes. Taliban is still there. Isis is still there. Americans meanwhile are not.They destroyed taliban that's why after US invasion taliban shifted base to Pakistan.
US is not begging them for peace anymore than Pakistan which is begging for a ceasefire. They destroyed saddam hussein and they destroyed ISIS forces in Kobane, Syria. ISIS will run out of volunteers before USA runs out of bombs to drop on their heads.
You very much run away. Look at 1971 war and the recent set backs suffered against TTP.
And how certain are you of victory my friend?the only issue was victory after that
American did not mobilise their full power? Tell me what will make the americans mobilize their full power? At their peak they had 180,000 soldiers in Afghanistan, 1/4th of their entire army. They had their best assets there, drones, B-52s, F-15s, Apaches. And yet you say they didn't? Tell me what will make American mobilize full power? They are already on their knees saying they are ready for talks with taliban and don't think taliban are terrorists.
As for WW2, they can never mobilize on that scale again. The global politics has changed and they haven't enforced conscription, neither do they have the money to mobilize on that scale. If anything they are becoming smaller.
Agreed. But you will see more war drum beating from Pakistan because it is logical for us. If India does not care or prepare much for war, it doesn't make as much difference to them if they get caught off guard. But Pakistan cannot afford that luxury. We need to keep reminding the Indians that our swords are sharp as a precaution against misadventure. Mind you, Pakistanis don't want war anymore than Indians. It's just a survival instinct.
And how certain are you of victory my friend?
Sigh. Are you also suggesting that US lost intentionally? By the way since you jumped in without reading anything, USA was brought in response to an indian troll saying that not being able to defeat taliban means Pakistan is not a professional military, surely by that standard even USA does not have a professional military.read your post, so even 1/4 power = full power? How does that make sense?
by the way, we have about 1.2 mil in our Army branch today, 600000 regular, 200000 reserve and another 400000 National Guard. And that does not include individual reserve (Those who fulfilled their ETS and still retained for operational readiness)
In reality, Afghanistan represent less than 1/10 of our Army strength. We can do 1/4 in term of logistic under full mob, not in a war like in Afghanistan.
Did i say it is a victory for Pakistan?How does MAD represent victory for Pakistan?
Suicide bomber mentality does not work in case of nuclear war
Sigh. Are you also suggesting that US lost intentionally? By the way since you jumped in without reading anything, USA was brought in response to an indian troll saying that not being able to defeat taliban means Pakistan is not a professional military, surely by that standard even USA does not have a professional military.
By the way since you mentioned, US presence in Afghanistan did have a significant portion of US military stuck in Afghanistan. US follows a two simultaneous wars policy, so if there was to be a 3rd war, they would have had to move troops from either of the two frontlines.
We don't run away or scare away from a fight. Pakistan wouldn't exist if that were the case.
Actually all the terrorist operations in SW & NW have been a blessing in disguise for our Army.
They are now the most battle ready then they ever were.
Peace time exercises cannot provide the level of training as compared to what they have gone through in the last 10 years...
All men and material has been tested, zeroed and ready...
I never said that there is no insurgency,just that unlike PA we dont use brute fore against our own people.Check out how IA has defeated terrorists in Kashmir without bombing them with Sukhoi's or using heavy firepower of artilleries and then check out the casuality figures and ultimate failures of Pakistani army in last ten years,this may help you in getting out of your delusions.Does it matter whether they use police or army? Insurgency is insurgency. it's just that Indians choose to be foolish and accept half measures that's why their police is suffering heavy casulties and much of central Indian states are under Maoists control..