PAKISTAN AIMS TO DEVELOP A LIGHT ARMOURED VEHICLE

[Path-Finder]

this is disgraceful and shoddy. no thought or planning went into this.

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

Khan 4 x 4 will do proper size and practical design

 

[Muhammad Omar]

These 2 Pakistan Army should consider Must

 

[AZADPAKISTAN2009]

The current setup is not proper

This brings us back to the problem of not having a Manufacturing base in Pakistan for Auto

All these variations should be donated to charity / and turned into ambulance etc

And proper ground vehicles are needed for Rangers / Military Units

Replaced with proper vehicle

This will work in both the border areas and in inner cities and checkpoints


Ideal for Military Base and Key facilities / Airports Major bases

The technological Advancement and advantage needs to show for Pakistani Troops (Rangers/ Military) against any Terrorist (Rouge/ Sponsored)

 

[Zarvan]

These 2 Pakistan Army should consider Must

Agreed with TOT they are great for both Police and Armed Forces

 

[Fawad alam]

better to invest in our own products like Uqaab Multipurpose armored vehicle.

 

[khanasifm]

It may be just upgraded version of existing HIT vehicles, upgraded for army, like upgraded mohafiz ?? Or protector

 

[Path-Finder]

Agreed with TOT they are great for both Police and Armed Forces

Are they offering ToT? So far they haven't offered anyone ToT on these Vehicles.

 

[Zarvan]

Are they offering ToT? So far they haven't offered anyone ToT on these Vehicles.

Yes they are offering problem is our leadership and their thinking

 

[Path-Finder]

Yes they are offering problem is our leadership and their thinking

can you back it up? So far countries have purchased from Turkey but no license has been given by them for vehicles!

 

[Ahmet Pasha]

Tumosan also had a good system.

Yes they are offering problem is our leadership and their thinking

can you back it up? So far countries have purchased from Turkey but no license has been given by them for vehicles!

 

[CriticalThought]

There is a very obvious trade-off between unarmoured Toyota pickup and fully armored combat vehicle: flexibility for close range threats. In the Toyota pickup, the men can engage a threat even if he is 1 m away. How would an armored vehicle help in a densely populated bazaar in an urban area? Soldiers would have to get off and walk beside the vehicle for cover!

 

[Path-Finder]

There is a very obvious trade-off between unarmoured Toyota pickup and fully armored combat vehicle: flexibility for close range threats. In the Toyota pickup, the men can engage a threat even if he is 1 m away. How would an armored vehicle help in a densely populated bazaar in an urban area? Soldiers would have to get off and walk beside the vehicle for cover!

There is no trade off! Either you send troops to their deaths or give them a fighting chance to fight another day!

 

[CriticalThought]

There is no trade off! Either you send troops to their deaths or give them a fighting chance to fight another day!

Sir, where is the fighting chance in the fully armored designs presented on this thread, if the enemy manages to get within 1 m of the vehicle?

 

[Path-Finder]

Sir, where is the fighting chance in the fully armored designs presented on this thread, if the enemy manages to get within 1 m of the vehicle?

unarmoured they will kill them from a distance because a 7.62 round will easily go through the vehicle!

you do know these armoured vehicles are designed for such operations! They have the ability to fight off people who get close. The yanks have spent a decade in them Iraq and afghanistan. how many casualties do they have and how many casualties does Pakistan have?