Yup world consists of many nations, but we know who favors whom. And you do know you are spending money for submarines, aircrafts, ships, etc. even when you have enough nuke delivery system. If you can threaten us with your nukes, why make these other weapons and purchase them.
India now don't want war with you, even when we have to mobilize our force on people's pressure. Why would we do anything that can hamper our economic growth. Try to understand reason behind deployment of troops but not attacking.
India don't care about your nuclear bombs as economic bomb is doing what we could have done to you. Just see the effect of India in Afghanistan and how your govt. is opposing it.
Buddy try to look at the bigger picture. The entire world w.r.t. to you are now making ties with India, for example KSA, UAE etc.
The answer to your question lies in the fact that all the other nuclear powers of the world still spend a lot to modernize their military and enhance their conventional capability even though they know nobody will dare attack them fearing the nuclear threat , Why? so they do not have to go to the last resort ... Look at the example of Israel ... What does it have to fear yet it still spends a lot on its military ... The same remains the case with Pakistan ... And it is not like we have rushed to purchase new weapons for our military forced by your latest modernization ... We are only buying what we planned years before ... What new purchases have you recently seen ?
... Islamabad isn't bothered by your modernization , it plays its cards well and only buys what is cost effective and necessary ... No rush !
Oh , it always wanted to teach Pakistan a lesson hence the mobilization and pressurizing the State of Pakistan to agree to its terms ... Didn't happen ... New Dehli realized that no longer it can cross the border without suffering unacceptable damage ... You have mobilized your troops 3 times in history and backed off each time ... Nobody mobilizes troops on people's pressure without an intention to start war
and then backs off unless of course they are faced with significant threat ... You can make excuses all day long though ...
Well , the current situation of the economy of Pakistan is temporary , it will recover soon as law and order in the country improves ... Do you need a reminder how was your's performing in 90's ?
Actually , now you are exaggerating the effect and magnitude of Indian presence in Afghanistan ... Yes , it has made Islamabad think but it is not a significant problem for us yet ... Not really ... We have decades of experience dealing in that country and influence which you realize not ... Your involvement there for less than a decade can do nothing to reduce our influence ... Afghanistan is unstable and sadly Indians dealing with the Govt of the presidential palace in not a threat to us ... Wait till 2014 and see how things turn out ... You will find it really hard to support your friends in Kabul once NATO abandons that country ... Ask yourself , if we are not important , then why does US of A always has to come to Pakistan to plan something in Afghanistan ?
Pakistan doesn't shows up in Chicago and Bonn and the summit fails ... Figure out Why ?
Provide that source.
Also only reason IA would have to cross the IB or LOC if gains could not be made in Kargil.
In the end Kargil came to India. So, no reason to cross IB or LOC.
I am not really interested in discussing Kargil further and involving myself in derailing the thread ... But do answer this logical question " Which army doesn't want to minimize its losses and take the war to the enemy ?
"
...Do you even read posts made here about your weapon purchases, India's role in BLA and TTP, your own people blame us, we are not taking any responsibility. Your leaders say this, your intellectuals say this, you must be only one who don't see anything.
"Surgical Strikes" and "Limited Conflict under a Nuclear Umbrella" 
