What's new

PAK Navy successfully intercepts Indian Submarine, foils intrusion

Here is proof of Major adnan intel.
53682539_2090642617638403_1402647662158675968_n.jpg
 
. . . .
It was detected snorkeling 26 NM south and in International waters, so sinking it is not an option, unless it fires on any of our vessels.

Detected by a P3C.

View attachment 544383

A question Sir, was the P3 accompanied by PAF jets for protection ?
I’m asking because I can’t forget our Jawans in the Atlantic jet.
Thanks.
 
. .
He is just making us spend our money, our situation is still very much in red, and the longer this goes on the less money we will have
 
.
scorpene submarine ..... :D:D:D
It seems(inexperienced as it is) to me that the intent is multifold. One is to provoke a response so that there is a good reason to escalate. Other could be to gauge the readiness and response threshold. If they had real intent to intrude and do something they would have sent something different.
 
. .
It seems(inexperienced as it is) to me that the intent is multifold. One is to provoke a response so that there is a good reason to escalate. Other could be to gauge the readiness and response threshold. If they had real intent to intrude and do something they would have sent something different.
like what ....???

Its the most advance conventional sub in Indian Navy
 
.
Sub location based on the video
 

Attachments

  • B610FFFF-1458-45E4-8CB4-CB53B933F728.jpeg
    B610FFFF-1458-45E4-8CB4-CB53B933F728.jpeg
    162.9 KB · Views: 79
  • 4D506B4E-57A7-4C1A-A3FC-0B4BCB2E3431.jpeg
    4D506B4E-57A7-4C1A-A3FC-0B4BCB2E3431.jpeg
    205.4 KB · Views: 80
. .
You know what would be great? If PN could post a pic of IN aircraft carrier or Mumbai coast/port from the periscope of a PN sub :wub: ohhhhhhhh
 
.
I have feelings (I’m not expert, I’m just normal civilian guy) that if Israelis advisers presence in India is confirmed, they are trying to :

- gauging our readiness
- to manipulate the mindset of our armed forces because they are preparing a bigger attack and for that need to make us confused.

I repeat I’m not expert so I could be well wrong
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom