This has no logic. Will India give N Weapons to any resistance movement in India to use against Pakistan?
Simply, no.
I don't see even the 0.00000000001 % chance of this happening. This shows the pea-like mind of the author that has no wit and intelligence. A title thats sufficient to show his lack of observing things.
This thread is gonna close soon!!! No illogical, BS articles allowed on this forum.
KIT Over
Your perception is correct, India will never let any non-state authority use its Nukes against Pakistan.
But just take a look at a few major differences between India and Pakistan:
1. India has 'no first use' policy. Pakistan does not.
2. India does not feed/nurture anti-state elements to use them as an 'asset' against Pakistan. Pakistan does, and has declared so a little too many times.
3. India has economic infrastructure, that is very vulnerable to wars, esp nuclear wars. Pakistan does not. (Means, in case of nuclear war, India has a lot to lose, in comparison to Pakistan, so in a way it is a win for Pakistan).
What makes you think that the actual power holders in Pakistan, who consider the insurgents a strong asset against India in times of war, will not try to slip off nukes (or anything whatsoever) to undermine India's economic position on global level (as the first step to weaken a nation)?
There's one more thing I have read in some places (not very credible, but worth reading - may be you can correct me here if I am wrong), that Pakistan's chain of command is very fragmented and is extremely untrustworthy, when one considers the degree of loyalty of every other General toward the Taliban. (Take the case of recently abducted Army personnel, and Hamid Gul's stand on that).
If it is true, then no matter how much the establishment of Pakistan wants to keep the nukes away from the insurgents, someone will always be there to slip one/two off to them, for one purpose or another.
The question is not how well the nukes are protected, rather the question we should be asking is, are there really any Talibani sympathizers in the establishment?
If yes, then Gubbi's concerns are very well justified.