What's new

Pak may provide N-weapons to Taliban for use against India

.
Well thread title is "Pak may provide N-weapons to Taliban for use against India "

I would say that, this can only happen when India relations completely disturbed with its ally Taliban
 
.
Well thread title is "Pak may provide N-weapons to Taliban for use against India "

I would say that, this can only happen when India relations completely disturbed with its ally Taliban

even though i do not think its right to start these kind of threads esp reports by times of india the above post is funny... taliban an ally of india?? come on man..
 
.
God almighty this is one duplicitous and lying 'sack o shite' establishment (US).

The popular image of the average American is 'straight forward', the American establishment (government, military intelligence etc.) could not be any more different from that image.

They put Machiavelli and Chanakya to shame with their deceit, games and manipulation.
 
.
"We don't want to use these weapons, but we're going to let our surrogate Taliban have access to these weapons and they'll do our dirty work," Bob Graham, head of US Commission on the Prevention of WMD proliferation and terrorism told US lawmakers at a Congressional hearing.

"We". Since when did his "We" came to imply Pakistan?
 
.
In all the confusion and chest thumping we seem to have lost one very important point the article or that one Mr. Bob Graham makes.

Unlike, the U.S. and the Soviet Union during the Cold War, where although we were strong adversaries and had the capability of destroying each other.

“We understood that we didn’t want to allow a misstep or an accidental event to become the ignition for such a war. So we set up the red phone in the Oval Office and a whole protocol,” Mr. Graham said referring to the report of the commission released early this year.

“None of that exists between India and Pakistan. I have felt that this may be an area in which the U.S. and Russia together, since we developed these protocols for our own benefit and the world’s benefit, might work together with India and Pakistan to try to get them to develop,” he said.

“I was encouraged that within the last month India and China have started to develop some of those fail-safe procedures. But there’s almost nothing that has been done in a similar vein between the real adversaries, which are India and Pakistan,” Mr. Graham said.

I actually wanted to highlight this particular aspect of the article. Unfortunately, the members got carried away by the title and started posting ridiculous comments - a crime I too am guilty of.

However, it becomes imperative that India and Pakistan develop this special hotline to dissipate any untoward incidents or rumors which might lead to a catastrophe considering the role of "non-state actors" and "rouge elements".

That was the reason why I posted the article, and not to inflame.
 
.
Why would we nuke India through such unreliable means and not directly bomb them through our arsenal of missiles?

Pakistan needs to nuke India by the dozens to make an effective first strike, one or two bombs won't cut it. Either no nuke, or all out nuking is how it will be done. Indians are yapping major BS with this piece of news.
 
.
Man cut out this bs rubish news this is the most dumbest threard ever haha lolz.. ... ic hating is at its best once again something just don't change and crying & hating is the new past time hobby for many.
 
Last edited:
.
well our official stance is that we will use the nuclear weapon if it ever comes to that. y then do we need LeT for pressing the button? will it kill less people? or will it confuse india due to the involvement of non state actors and hence no retaliatory attack? furthermore world will be more determined to take out our nukes if instead of us, LeT presses the button.
had we changed our official policy to no first strike, this would have made some sense.

can every dick head become a head of some committee in US? if yes then y r we wasting our time studying.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom