What's new

PAF's possible answer to MRCA

Indian members are often handed infractions for off topic rants... seems like windjammer has immunity... congrats

So by your logic the topic is ....whether China will jump into an India/Pakistan war.!!! please continue.
 
Since there is no cure to self denial.....indeed back to topic.!!

On topic.. The changes in the ASR regarding the MMRCA would have tackled any procurement. The aircraft are fairly well known to the PAF regardless.
Considering the planned increase in the FC-20 purchase and the improvement plans for the air defense systems. The overall increase in threat posed by the IAF seems to have been lowered.
However, what do you suppose could be done on the southern front to ameliorate the threat a potential Rafale purchase would bring(along with the new french weapons)

---------- Post added at 05:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:33 AM ----------

We(India-Pakistan) don't believe each other. that's why we fought wars frequently. may be we can't. so only im asking credible source.

Im not asking you to believe it, just let me believe what I want to.. instead of repeating the same mantra of us Pakistanis being "delusional".. agree to disagree...instead of going about like parrots.
 
On topic.. The changes in the ASR regarding the MMRCA would have tackled any procurement. The aircraft are fairly well known to the PAF regardless.
Considering the planned increase in the FC-20 purchase and the improvement plans for the air defense systems. The overall increase in threat posed by the IAF seems to have been lowered.
However, what do you suppose could be done on the southern front to ameliorate the threat a potential Rafale purchase would bring(along with the new french weapons)

---------- Post added at 05:34 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:33 AM ----------



Im not asking you to believe it, just let me believe what I want to.. instead of repeating the same mantra of us Pakistanis being "delusional".. agree to disagree...instead of going about like parrots.

i think talking about MKI intrusion without any proof is just trolling.He repeating that statement again and again. so i asked him source. anyways i ll get back to topic.
 
Winjammer and Santro,

Please guys, come on why you are hurting the feelings of our guests here. MKI is their pride and this incident really put that pride in questionable position. Everyone know the incident and also know that Indians would never accept it.
 
I said -If awacs shot down-

i am kidding bro i got what you mean.
LOL!! ok now your falling back on "Ifs" and "buts"
like u say to every one else provide proof...but that doesn't apply on you does it...when asked how you go diverting the topic so thats enough of that ...

Back to the topic of MMRCA...
What im interested in is that FC-20 can also act like a "JFT" for us,I mean I dont think that China would mind us integrating the likes of A-darter,MAR-1,RAAD cruise missile etc on it...
And one more thing can one guide the likes of AMRAAMS and SD-10B's using AWACS through data linking??
 
LOL!! ok now your falling back on "Ifs" and "buts"
like u say to every one else provide proof...but that doesn't apply on you does it...when asked how you go diverting the topic so thats enough of that ...

Back to the topic of MMRCA...
What im interested in is that FC-20 can also act like a "JFT" for us,I mean I dont think that China would mind us integrating the likes of A-darter,MAR-1,RAAD cruise missile etc on it...

so when you gonna start procuring FC-20 and in what numbers ? Is FC-20 operational ?
 
LOL!! ok now your falling back on "Ifs" and "buts"
like u say to every one else provide proof...but that doesn't apply on you does it...when asked how you go diverting the topic so thats enough of that ...

Back to the topic of MMRCA...
What im interested in is that FC-20 can also act like a "JFT" for us,I mean I dont think that China would mind us integrating the likes of A-darter,MAR-1,RAAD cruise missile etc on it...
And one more thing can one guide the likes of AMRAAMS and SD-10B's using AWACS through data linking??


read my post #1286

put it into context.... give the F-16 AWACS support, give it the range of combat against an MKI similar to that of which and Indo-Pak war would allow it. F-16s suddenly become a formidable fighting force, they can defend the airspace against MKI very well.

PAF hasn't got involved in the numbers game for obvious reasons, you may see F-16s flying in groups where one is painting and feeding the armed F-16s, one F-16 dedicated for electronic attack.... etc.

what if Pakistani AWACS shot down. JF-17:undecided::undecided::hang2:



i want to see TYPHOON in IAF. damn beast.
 
so when you gonna start procuring FC-20 and in what numbers ? Is FC-20 operational ?
If the MMRRCA specific rafale and EF-2000 are operational then so is the FC-20...
I mean if you consider the EF-2000 and rafale operational while the MMRCA specific fighters requires upgrades like AESA etc....... if those are operational than so is the FC-20
 
On topic.. The changes in the ASR regarding the MMRCA would have tackled any procurement. The aircraft are fairly well known to the PAF regardless.
Considering the planned increase in the FC-20 purchase and the improvement plans for the air defense systems. The overall increase in threat posed by the IAF seems to have been lowered.
However, what do you suppose could be done on the southern front to ameliorate the threat a potential Rafale purchase would bring(along with the new french weapons)

As i said else where, PAF can field say five JF-17 for the price of a single Rafale, say a package of four Rafael is sent to attack the Southern sector, the are countered by a multi dimensional defence from Navy and PAF, there is a good chance to neutralise the aggressor, for the same effort PAF can field a dozen or more JF-17, even a 50% attrition would still leave enough firepower to cause some serious damage. What do you say.
 
It will be coming in the same timeframe is the MMRCA.. tell me.. is the MMRCA operational?

Kind sir kindly please tell me how was my last post off topic & why was it deleated i had only given a answer asked by windjammer ,thanks kindly do respond thanks agaon SIR
 
It will be coming in the same timeframe is the MMRCA.. tell me.. is the MMRCA operational?

U didn't tell us about the quantity.

Typhoon and Rafale both are operational aircraft in many airforce. FC-20 is not operational only her prototype is flying
 
If the MMRRCA specific rafale and EF-2000 are operational then so is the FC-20...
I mean if you consider the EF-2000 and rafale operational while the MMRCA specific fighters require AESA etc if those are operational and considered operational by you than so is FC-20

even in there present configuration they are better than Superhornet and f-16 block 60 with AESA
 
As i said else where, PAF can field say five JF-17 for the price of a single Rafale, say a package of four Rafael is sent to attack the Southern sector, the are countered by a multi dimensional defence from Navy and PAF, there is a good chance to neutralise the aggressor, for the same effort PAF can field a dozen or more JF-17, even a 50% attrition would still leave enough firepower to cause some serious damage. What do you say.

Considering planned improvements in the JF and the overall PAF "Net".. it may very well be possible that by the time the MMRCA comes into a credible force.. a JF-17 force based in the south , along with the Jacobabad Block 52 sq.. might form a potent force to prevent any IAF force from achieving their objectives. Even with 80% attrition, if the IAF force was unable to get through.. job is done.

---------- Post added at 05:55 AM ---------- Previous post was at 05:54 AM ----------

U didn't tell us about the quantity.

Typhoon and Rafale both are operational aircraft in many airforce. FC-20 is not operational only her prototype is flying

I dont care about them being operational or not.
When are the MMRCA coming? stick to the topic...
IS the MMRCA for the IAF operational or not?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom