Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This I can totally understand and fully agree with. I know about PAF C4I systems well but due to the confidential nature of the data I cannot realse much of it. The pictures and data that we share here are those that have already been published somewhere. The picture of PAF for example was published in a PAF calender so I posted it.
There are however some names of PAF C4ISR centers which have been published. They are GMCC (Generic Mission Control Center). SMCC (Sector Mission Control Center) and ADOC (Air Defence Operational Center).
I have not included PAF AWACS because we consider them as sensors or at best C3I systems.
If no pictures than any names of IAF C4I systems?
does not show map of India. Please post a picture of IAF C4I system clearly showing digital map. At present I feel that that your GIS section has not come up with its first release.
Please post picture with digitized map of India till then PAF C4I one pic, IAF C4I zero pic.
C4i is important to an air force but it has to have assets to exploit it....in this case iaf
*fighter radars su-30,mig-21,mig-29,mirage(all of which have better radars than pak fighters).
*phalcon aesa which we know clearly packs a better punch.
*swordfish,greenpine aesa which hav no matches from the other side.
*sam s-300,osa-k,pechora,sa-6(remeber f-117),shilka. but paf has the not so capable croatle(short range),sa-2 copy.
*aerostat which has no equals from the other side.
*ur own sattelites to ensure secure info tranfer(where india has an edge)
*IT industries to support ur program.
*uavs which india has in larger number.
so even if pak has superior c4I it has to have capable assets to perform the required task,if the assets are crap then c4i is a total waste with f-16a/b,f-7,rose,sa-2
BEL will arrange technology demonstration of its C4ISR capability at Defexpo 2010. It will show its Multi Sensor Data Fusion for Army application.
After you put picture. Want something give something.
does not show map of India. Please post a picture of IAF C4I system clearly showing digital map. At present I feel that that your GIS section has not come up with its first release.
Please post picture with digitized map of India till then PAF C4I one pic, IAF C4I zero pic.
These statements are debateable to say the least. The APG and Grifo Radars are quite capable and I think it would take a seprate vs thread to actually determine which is better. Similary Phalon or eireye which is better is quite debateable.
True but these are strategic not tactical systems. If I am wrong than please tell me how will you conduct GCI from a range of 1500Kms.
Once again a cleary controversial statement. The radars mentioned in this thread clearly show that PAF has an equal if not a better ADGE. It is the VERA for which the Indians have no equivalent.
India in my opinion does have an edge here.
UAVs which PAF can and has shot down. Not very useful.
With such a biased attitude such as your the mere possibility that PAF may have a superior c4I indicates victory for PAF.
As far as crap equipment is concerned IAF has a history of keeping such equipment. In 1965 it was the Vampire. Rafiqui shot them even before the war started and they were never seen again. Now it is you Mig 27 fleet which is crap they shall have almost no role in a future conflict. Same is the case with your UAVs crap because they cannot survive in enemy territory.
The only IAF thing which surely is not crap is the C4I system. That to because it does not exist.
The world fastest tank is the British Scorpion it has a maximum speed of 82.23 Km/h
The world fastest aircraft is NASAs X-43 Hyper X with a maximum speed of 10,855 km/h
The difference between a C4ISR system for Army and Airforce is that the Airforce system needs to be more than hundred times more responsive.
Do let us know when BEL or some other company is ready to demonstrate C4I systems for IAF. Pakistan as mentioned in this thread has not only developed but also sold such a system to Bangladesh.
I dnt know what you want to prove with one picture
You show nothing except one pic (Just compare them with ISRO systems)
On the other hand we have lot of detail about our systems
It is not about one pic DRDO the whole thread proves it.
The posts clearly show that Pakistan is secretive about its system very little data is being released.
India on the other hand is very open about its systems as you youself have admitted.
The mere absence of IAF C4I related data on the web is proof enough that such a system at present does not exist. What exists has been posted it has no digital map so at present the GIS is under development.
I am sure as soon as IAF gets a c4I system you shall be the first to post it. Till then