What's new

PAF urgent need of SAM

Tor, pantsyr protects radars or installations from harms cruise missiles. Also build or purchase radar decoys practicing with open close move shoot and scoot. Hq 2 if has a harder to jam radar with some mobility combined with above can barely offer some defence but urgently needs to be replaced with an s300 derivative.Hq 16 can be employed similar to Pantsyr. I like pantsyr because it has a very light 80kg missile that can reach relatively high altitudes about 10km. It is command to line of sight missile does not have complex heat or radar seeker. Rocket can be copied and produced for locally made sam systems.

Another thing is radars capability. Being a nuclear power you should have at least a several radars capable of early warning against ballistic missiles for a quick deterrant launch capability. 360 degree coverage to not to risk anything. Need to buy greenpine like radars for ballistic coverage.Today only for early warning. Maybe later combined with bm defence.
 
.
We already have ACMI pod technology since long first time the ACMI was displayed in 2000 or 2002 IDEAS defence exhibition .... currently we are offering the 'next generation' ACMI pod to the international market

View attachment 250555

I known & you said as well that Pakistan is using 'heavily modified' Turkish electronic warfare and training simulation system therefore I think the Turkish sys. must be modified to make it compatible with the existing technologies available to us.


Electronic warfare simulation and training systems should be modified in accordance with costumer's inventory, active missiles and likely threat perceptions. For examples, It is Greek Air Force posing serious threat to TurAF with various type of Russian/European/USA SAM systems along with Mirage/F-16 fighters. The simulation system should generate the similar threats imitating the available threats from AA missiles to SAM's. It is the reason Turkey ordered S-300, Tor, BUK systems to add the characteristics of related missiles into simulation inventory to lock TuRAF aircrafts in training sessions. What TurAF aircrafts should do is to make correct maneouvring, While generating strong electronic warfare tactics for avoiding/destroying maneouvrings...
 
.
What sort of radars Pak has got newly except 150KM range radars with LY80 SAMS. Pak already lacks true modern radars having stealth detection capabilities.

Pak should go for HQ9 batteries though in limited numbers along with short to medium range SAMs to compensate them with capable next gen Radars and Sensors to detect Stealth Jets or CMs at sufficient distances.

Pakistan displayed HQ-9 radar some time ago which created rumors of HQ-9 purchase and deployment
 
. . . . . .
Imran Khan----if I was to tell you something---then I will have to kill you----. So---why don't you consider yourself dead.
 
.
Imran Khan----if I was to tell you something---then I will have to kill you----. So---why don't you consider yourself dead.

Sir Jee

Calm down. This is not the first time, it was revealed quite a while back on this very forum that PAF possessed HQ-9 and FT2000 batteries. Actually now if i think about it, the procurement goes a long way back so it was only a matter of time before this information was leaked. @Imran Khan has a right to know.
 
.
no hard evidence of HQ9 provided as per norms of this forum so people have right to assume that Pak don't have them.
 
.
Sir Jee

Calm down. This is not the first time, it was revealed quite a while back on this very forum that PAF possessed HQ-9 and FT2000 batteries. Actually now if i think about it, the procurement goes a long way back so it was only a matter of time before this information was leaked. @Imran Khan has a right to know.
sir jee

ab hum aysi goli main nhi aany wally after usama raid we have no faith is this secret games .:D ya to maal show karo ya phir sorry :lol:

what is longest range of pakistan sams
60km buss:(
 
.
Imran Khan----if I was to tell you something---then I will have to kill you----. So---why don't you consider yourself dead.

LOL :tup: MK. Pakistan has HQ-9's too (or the FD equivalent of that) with around of over 100 KM range. A few batteries were acquired after Salala check post attacks. One was stationed in KPK, about 50 KM inside the border (to cover for 40-50 KM inside Afghanistan) and the other ones at some strategic point right off the border to Punjab and Sindh to provide coverage to multiple HVL's (high value locations). A couple of tests were conducts around Multan area in 2013 I think,
 
.
India has zero interest in fighting Pakistan, and Pakistani Military Command knows that quite well.
India is more interested in covert operations like attacking Army Public School and sabotaging activities.
 
.
I dont see india sending aircraft across the border. India will lose more money in stock exchange than damages from any pakistan retaliation. Afghanistan can do that job for India(you are thinking about strategic ditch...err i mean depth).

Too bad we decommissioned our foxbats. Well why not borrow the S-300's from Iran or buy it from our ruski frnds.:what:

Afghanistan can't send its paper warriors outside of Kabul to clean up Talibans in the remainder of the country, let alone attack Pakistan :rofl:. Those fools wanted the US military to remain there for the next decade and fight their war, the mess they brewed and supported and it is still there and they aren't doing anything to clean it up either, just talk, corruption and incompetency for the job.

On Foxbats.....they would've taken out by HQ-9..... or wouldn't come back for the second time if they actually exit'd the first time around beating 1 o 2 HQ-9's. Unless India just wanted to waste money and EVERYONE knows, India can NEVER waste money, not even a dime, even for a good reason :omghaha: :cheers:
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom