The enlightened
BANNED
- Joined
- Nov 12, 2011
- Messages
- 948
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
That's why there are nukes.Any war longer than 15 days and Pakistan cannot hold its major cities.
Its a simple matter of funds, economy and landscape.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's why there are nukes.Any war longer than 15 days and Pakistan cannot hold its major cities.
Its a simple matter of funds, economy and landscape.
Any war longer than 15 days and Pakistan cannot hold its major cities.
Its a simple matter of funds, economy and landscape.
Your assuming Pakistan not winning that war in the fortnight period. Besides, I read Pakistan does have oil reserves to endure a war longer than 15 days perhaps double, though oil isn't the only thing a country needs its a major factor though.
Though how long do you think the enemy can endure war, less than two months I'd say.
OIl reserves are not immune to attack.. and are not the only thing a country needs.
It needs ammunition.. which has a shelf life and needs replacing or refurbishment.
it needs platforms for weapons.. Aircraft, Tanks, Ships.. All expensive. .. costly to maintain even in peace time.
Moreover.. Unless overwhelming.. and I mean overwhelming force with weapons systems and personell in a ratio of 1:1 or greater is maintained at the border.. there is a chance of losing ground to the enemy..
And Pakistan has neither the former or the latter.
A short war.. with quick tactical strikes to SLOW the advance.. and then force a diplomatic solution is the way to go.
I disagree with your analysis your not encouraging fighting to win but fighting for a diplomatic solution which means the war would achieve nothing no objective. You also are forgetting Pakistan's missile capability that can wreak havoc on enemy targets both structural and personnel. So Pakistan can decisively deeply project power into enemy territory.
Your idea has been tried by PA it's nothing new and to be honest its quite unhelpful. You have to fight to win understand? Enough of this bs ceasefire and diplomatic solution. Pakistani awam better prepare itself and better get the economy in order.
The last decade in the AF has been like the phoenix rising from the flame. Go PAF
OIl reserves are not immune to attack.. and are not the only thing a country needs.
It needs ammunition.. which has a shelf life and needs replacing or refurbishment.
it needs platforms for weapons.. Aircraft, Tanks, Ships.. All expensive. .. costly to maintain even in peace time.
Moreover.. Unless overwhelming.. and I mean overwhelming force with weapons systems and personell in a ratio of 1:1 or greater is maintained at the border.. there is a chance of losing ground to the enemy..
And Pakistan has neither the former or the latter.
A short war.. with quick tactical strikes to SLOW the advance.. and then force a diplomatic solution is the way to go.
I disagree with your analysis your not encouraging fighting to win but fighting for a diplomatic solution which means the war would achieve nothing no objective. You also are forgetting Pakistan's missile capability that can wreak havoc on enemy targets both structural and personnel. So Pakistan can decisively deeply project power into enemy territory.
Your idea has been tried by PA it's nothing new and to be honest its quite unhelpful. You have to fight to win understand? Enough of this bs ceasefire and diplomatic solution. Pakistani awam better prepare itself and better get the economy in order.
Your long rage missiles will damage civil property....will not damage army....war means country on hold no earning only spending that too..huge spending everyday....enemy can engage you longer to destroy your economy and can bring you to stone age....war is really bad everyone even for the victorious country.....
Do you when US fired thousands of cruise missile ..each cost $.15 million to US
What you did in AF is not war....war is like what you did with India in past.
Ya I know..I missed few words in between..Do not comprehend English please.
New Recruit
Ya I know..I missed few words in between..
here you go..
Your long range missiles will damage civil property....will not damage army....war brings country on hold ....no earnings and huge spending everyday....enemy can engage you longer to destroy your economy and can bring you to stone age....war is really bad for everyone ....even for the victorious country.....
Do you know when US fired thousands of cruise missile on Iraq ..each cost $.15 million to US